nach oben

Tipp

Robotic liver surgery—advantages and limitations

verfasst von: Camille Stewart, MD, Yuman Fong

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

Robotic surgery is now within the standard of care for many operations, including hepatectomy. Robotic liver surgery has advantages over laparoscopic and open surgical techniques, but these must be weighed against certain limitations when selecting an approach.

Methods

Advantages and limitations of robotic liver surgery are discussed here based on a literature survey.

Results

Advantages include improved surgeon ergonomics, better access to posterior and superior liver segments, excellent visualization, and ease of using indocyanine green. There may also be a shorter learning curve for use, and there are possibilities for technological assistance with surgery in the future. Limitations are related to those known for minimally invasive surgery in general, but also include time for docking and cost. Considerations are reviewed in detail to facilitate decision making when considering a robotic approach for liver surgery.

Conclusion

The robotic platform is not appropriate for all liver operations at this time. Benefits of robotic surgery are most clearly realized when approaching lesions in the posterior and superior segments, and when a large incision would be required to remove a small amount of liver parenchyma were the operation to be performed in an open fashion.

Vorheriger Artikel Robotic surgery for thoracic surgery

Nächster Artikel Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—will robotic surgery be the future?

Lafaro KJ, Stewart C, Fong A, Fong Y. Robotic liver resection. Surg Clin North Am. 2020;100:265–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2019.11.003. CrossRefPubMed

Szeto GP, Poon JT, Law WL. A comparison of surgeon’s postural muscle activity during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery. J Robot Surg. 2013;7:305–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0374-z. CrossRefPubMed

van der Schatte Olivier RH, Van’t Hullenaar CD, Ruurda JP, Broeders IA. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1365–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0184-6. CrossRefPubMed

Kuo LJ, Ngu JC, Lin YK, Chen CC, Tang YH. A pilot study comparing ergonomics in laparoscopy and robotics: beyond anecdotes, and subjective claims. J Surg Case Rep. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjaa005. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Lee JY. The da Vinci surgical system overcomes innate hand dominance. J Endourol. 2011;25:1385–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0093. CrossRefPubMed

Soueid A, Oudit D, Thiagarajah S, Laitung G. The pain of surgery: pain experienced by surgeons while operating. Int J Surg. 2010;8:118–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.008. CrossRefPubMed

Yang L, Money SR, Marrow MM, et al. Impact of procedure type, case duration, and adjunctive equipment on surgeon intraoperative musculoskeletal discomfort. J Am Coll Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.035. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Meltzer AJ, Hallbeck MS, Morrow MM, et al. Measuring ergonomic risk in operating surgeons by using wearable technology. JAMA Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6384. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hallbeck MS, Lowndes BR, Bingener J, et al. The impact of intraoperative microbreaks with exercises on surgeons: a multi-center cohort study. Appl Ergon. 2017;60:334–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.12.006. CrossRefPubMed

10.

Wells AC, Kjellman M, Harper SJF, Forsman M, Hallbeck MS. Operating hurts: a study of EAES surgeons. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:933–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6574-5. CrossRefPubMed

11.

Davis WT, Fletcher SA, Guillamondegui OD. Musculoskeletal occupational injury among surgeons: effects for patients, providers, and institutions. J Surg Res. 2014;189:207–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.013. CrossRefPubMed

12.

Jain S, Sharma B, Kaushik M, Jain L. Debakey forceps crushing technique for hepatic parenchymal transection in liver surgery: a review of 100 cases and ergonomic advantages. HPB Surg. 2014;2014:861829. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/861829. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Plerhoples TA, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wren SM. The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2012;6:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0330-3. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Fong Y, Woo Y, Hyung WJ, Lau C, Strong VE, editors. SAGES atlas in robotic surgery. 2019.

15.

Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Hagendoorn J. Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: a Western-European experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2017;6:239–45. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2016.12.05. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O’Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8. CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lee W, Han HS, Yoon YS, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in the posterosuperior segments or anterolateral segments: a case-matched analysis. Surgery. 2016;160:1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.05.009. CrossRefPubMed

18.

Teo JY, Kam JH, Chan CY, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection for posterosuperior and anterolateral lesions—a comparison experience in an Asian centre. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2015;4:379–90. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2015.06.06. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261:619–29. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001184. CrossRefPubMed

20.

Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GMW, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002353. CrossRefPubMed

21.

Aghayan DL, Fretland ÅA, Kazaryan AM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the posterosuperior segments: a sub-group analysis from the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. HPB. 2019;21:1485–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.358. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Melstrom LG, Warner SG, Woo Y, et al. Selecting incision-dominant cases for robotic liver resection: towards outpatient hepatectomy with rapid recovery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2018;7:77–84. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2017.05.05. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Nota CL, Woo Y, Raoof M, et al. Robotic versus open minor liver resections of the posterosuperior segments: a multinational, propensity score-matched study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:583–90. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6928-1. CrossRefPubMed

24.

Croner RS, Perrakis A, Hohenberger W, Brunner M. Robotic liver surgery for minor hepatic resections: a comparison with laparoscopic and open standard procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016;401:707–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1440-1. CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 2014;259:549–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250. CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kingham TP, Leung U, Kuk D, et al. Robotic liver resection: a case-matched comparison. World J Surg. 2016;40:1422–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3446-9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, et al. Robotic versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a matched comparison. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1021–8. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5638-9. CrossRefPubMed

28.

Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Waaler B, et al. Quality of life from a randomized trial of laparoscopic or open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11227. CrossRefPubMed

29.

Hu L, Yao L, Li X, Jin P, Yang K, Guo T. Effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver neoplasms: a meta-analysis of retrospective studies. Asian J Surg. 2018;41:401–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2017.07.001. CrossRefPubMed

30.

Moore LJ, Wilson MR, Waine E, Masters RS, McGrath JS, Vine SJ. Robotic technology results in faster and more robust surgical skill acquisition than traditional laparoscopy. J Robot Surg. 2015;9:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-014-0493-9. CrossRefPubMed

31.

Montalti R, Scuderi V, Patriti A, Vivarelli M, Troisi RI. Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1004–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4284-9. CrossRefPubMed

32.

Zhu P, Liao W, Ding ZY, et al. Learning curve in robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23:1778–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3689-x. CrossRefPubMed

33.

Chen PD, Wu CY, Hu RH, et al. Robotic major hepatectomy: Is there a learning curve? Surgery. 2017;161:642–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.025. CrossRefPubMed

34.

van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, et al. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:923–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1655. CrossRefPubMed

35.

Efanov M, Alikhanov R, Tsvirkun V, et al. Comparative analysis of learning curve in complex robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19:818–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.05.003. CrossRef

36.

Chong CCN, Lok HT, Fung AKY, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system. Surg Endosc. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06976-8. CrossRefPubMed

37.

Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:131–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0571-1. CrossRefPubMed

38.

deBeche-Adams T, Eubanks WS, de la Fuente SG. Early experience with the Senhance® laparoscopic/robotic platform in the US. J Robot Surg. 2019;13:357–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0893-3. CrossRefPubMed

39.

Heron DM, Dong M. Upcoming robotic systems. In: Tsuda S, Kudsi O, editors. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery. New York: Springer; 2018p. pp. 319–21.

40.

van Bergen P, Kunert W, Bessell J, Buess GF. Comparative study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional vision systems for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:948–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900754. CrossRefPubMed

41.

Cassilly R, Diodato MD, Bottros M, Damiano RJ Jr.. Optimizing motion scaling and magnification in robotic surgery. Surgery. 2004;136:291–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2004.05.002. CrossRefPubMed

42.

Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:790–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2. CrossRefPubMed

43.

Moore LJ, Wilson MR, McGrath JS, Waine E, Masters RS, Vine SJ. Surgeons’ display reduced mental effort and workload while performing robotically assisted surgical tasks, when compared to conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2553–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3967-y. CrossRefPubMed

44.

Cherrick GR, Stein SW, Leevy CM, Davidson CS. Indocyanine green: observations on its physical properties, plasma decay, and hepatic extraction. J Clin Invest. 1960;39:592–600. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI104072. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Faybik P, Hetz H. Plasma disappearance rate of indocyanine green in liver dysfunction. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:801–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.01.049. CrossRefPubMed

46.

Daskalaki D, Fernandes E, Wang X, et al. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography during robotic cholecystectomy: results of 184 consecutive cases in a single institution. Surg Innov. 2014;21:615–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350614524839. CrossRefPubMed

47.

Zhang YM, Shi R, Hou JC, et al. Liver tumor boundaries identified intraoperatively using real-time indocyanine green fluorescence imaging. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:51–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-016-2267-4. CrossRefPubMed

48.

van der Vorst JR, Schaafsma BE, Hutteman M, et al. Near-infrared fluorescence-guided resection of colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2013;119:3411–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28203. CrossRefPubMed

49.

Ishizawa T, Fukushima N, Shibahara J, et al. Real-time identification of liver cancers by using indocyanine green fluorescent imaging. Cancer. 2009;115:2491–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24291. CrossRefPubMed

50.

Alfano MS, Molfino S, Benedicenti S, et al. Intraoperative ICG-based imaging of liver neoplasms: a simple yet powerful tool. Preliminary results. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:126–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6282-1. CrossRefPubMed

51.

Handgraaf HJM, Boogerd LSF, Höppener DJ, et al. Long-term follow-up after near-infrared fluorescence-guided resection of colorectal liver metastases: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43:1463–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.04.016. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Boogerd LS, Handgraaf HJ, Lam HD, et al. Laparoscopic detection and resection of occult liver tumors of multiple cancer types using real-time near-infrared fluorescence guidance. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:952–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5007-6. CrossRefPubMed

53.

Marino MV, Di Saverio S, Podda M, Gomez Ruiz M, Gomez Fleitas M. The application of Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging during robotic liver resection: a case-matched study. World J Surg. 2019;43:2595–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05055-2. CrossRefPubMed

54.

Liu B, Liu T, Su M, et al. Improving the surgical effect for primary liver cancer with Intraoperative fluorescence navigation compared with Intraoperative ultrasound. Med Sci Monit. 2019;25:3406–16. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.916423. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Clements LW, Collins JA, Weis JA, et al. Deformation correction for image guided liver surgery: an intraoperative fidelity assessment. Surgery. 2017;162:537–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.020. CrossRefPubMed

56.

Heiselman JS, Clements LW, Collins JA, et al. Characterization and correction of intraoperative soft tissue deformation in image-guided laparoscopic liver surgery. J Med Imaging. 2018;5:21203. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.5.2.021203. CrossRef

57.

Soler L, Nicolau S, Pessaux P, Mutter D, Marescaux J. Real-time 3D image reconstruction guidance in liver resection surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2014;3:73–81. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.02.03. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

58.

Teatini A, Pelanis E, Aghayan DL, et al. The effect of intraoperative imaging on surgical navigation for laparoscopic liver resection surgery. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18687. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54915-3. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Qian L, Deguet A, Kazanzides P. ARssist: augmented reality on a head-mounted display for the first assistant in robotic surgery. Healthc Technol Lett. 2018;5:194–200. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2018.5065. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Khan S, Beard RE, Kingham PT, Fong Y, Boerner T, Martinie JB, et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes following robotic liver resections for primary hepatobiliary malignancies: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:2652–60. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6629-9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Ahmad A, Ahmad ZF, Carleton JD, Agarwala A. Robotic surgery: current perceptions and the clinical evidence. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:255–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4966-y. CrossRefPubMed

62.

Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2011;146:844–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.145. CrossRefPubMed

63.

Einarsson JI, Hibner M, Advincula AP. Side docking: an alternative docking method for gynecologic robotic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011;4(3–4):123–5. PubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Waters JA, Canal DF, Wiebke EA, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: cost effective? Surgery. 2010;148:814–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.027. CrossRefPubMed

65.

Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schär G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:604–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a. CrossRefPubMed

66.

Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W, et al. Robotic inguinal vs transabdominal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the RIVAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0034. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

67.

Ashraf J, Krishnan J, Turner A, Subramaniam R. Robot docking time: cumulative summation analysis of a procedure-independent learning curve in pediatric urology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28:1139–41. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0418. CrossRefPubMed

68.

Sankaranarayanan G, Resapu RR, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg S, De S. Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3056–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2823-9. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Mendelson BJ, Feldman JM, Addante RA. Argon embolus from argon beam coagulator. J Clin Anesth. 2017;42:86–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.08.021. CrossRefPubMed

70.

Ousmane ML, Fleyfel M, Vallet B. Venous gas embolism during liver surgery with argon-enhanced coagulation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002;19:225. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021502220384. CrossRefPubMed

71.

Stojeba N, Mahoudeau G, Segura P, Meyer C, Steib A. Possible venous argon gas embolism complicating argon gas enhanced coagulation during liver surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43:866–7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430815.x. CrossRefPubMed

72.

No Authors listed. Fatal gas embolism caused by overpressurization during laparoscopic use of argon enhanced coagulation. Health Devices. 1994;23(6):257–9.

73.

Palmer M, Miller CW, Van Way CW 3rd, Orton EC. Venous gas embolism associated with argon-enhanced coagulation of the liver. J Invest Surg. 1993;6:391–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939309141626. CrossRefPubMed

74.

Shaikh N, Ummunisa F. Acute management of vascular air embolism. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2009;2:180–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.55330. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:701–4. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1006602. CrossRefPubMed

76.

Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:598–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2. CrossRefPubMed

77.

Higgins RM, Frelich MJ, Bosler ME, Gould JC. Cost analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery procedures. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:185–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4954-2. CrossRefPubMed

78.

Kim HI, Han SU, Yang HK, et al. Multicenter prospective comparative study of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2016;263:103–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001249. CrossRefPubMed

79.

Sham JG, Richards MK, Seo YD, Pillarisetty VG, Yeung RS, Park JO. Efficacy and cost of robotic hepatectomy: is the robot cost-prohibitive? J Robot Surg. 2016;10:307–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-016-0598-4. CrossRefPubMed

80.

Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Heredia R, Brown M, et al. Financial impact of the robotic approach in liver surgery: a comparative study of clinical outcomes and costs between the robotic and open technique in a single institution. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017;27:375–82. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0576. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Wu CY, Chen PD, Chou WH, Liang JT, Huang CS, Wu YM. Is robotic hepatectomy cost-effective? In view of patient-reported outcomes. Asian J Surg. 2019;42:543–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.010. CrossRefPubMed

82.

Hilal A, Di Fabio M, Syed S, et al. Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2542–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2779-1. CrossRefPubMed

83.

Finch RJ, Malik HZ, Hamady ZZ, et al. Effect of type of resection on outcome of hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1242–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5640. CrossRefPubMed

84.

Stewart GD, O’Súilleabháin CB, Madhavan KK, Wigmore SJ, Parks RW, Garden OJ. The extent of resection influences outcome following hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2004;30:370–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2004.01.011. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Robotic liver surgery—advantages and limitations
verfasst von: Camille Stewart, MD
Yuman Fong
Publikationsdatum: 08.07.2020
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: European Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-020-00650-3

Springer Medizin Österreich

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Robotic liver surgery—advantages and limitations

Summary

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Springer Medizin Österreich

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

Summary

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences

Surgery reunites the world for the benefit of our health

Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery—will robotic surgery be the future?

Robotic surgery 2021

Robotic repair of lateral incisional hernias using intraperitoneal onlay, preperitoneal, and retromuscular mesh placement: a comparison of mid-term results and surgical technique

Abdominal wall reconstruction: new technology for new techniques