Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Surgery 4/2021

19.07.2021 | main topic

Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences

verfasst von: Bianka Hummel, Anna Nagel, Benjamin Süsoy, Linda Tarantik, Linda Michlmayr, Friedrich Längle, Clemens Bittermann, MD

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Background

A minimally invasive access for rectal surgery provides many advantages. Still, laparoscopic surgery has its limits when it comes to preparation in the small, narrow pelvis. Technical features of robot-assisted surgery have the high potential to overcome these limitations.

Methods

The operative technique of robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery is described according to the experience of our department and based on a literature survey using Medline (PubMed). Data of our patients were obtained by retrospective analysis.

Results

From May 2015 to June 2020, 192 surgical interventions of the rectum were carried out with the DaVinci® Xi system (Intuitive Surgical, CA, USA) in our department. 3D visualization, ability to scale motions, and steady presentation enable an improved view of the operative field and a better anatomical discrimination of nerves and other structures. Articulated instruments with seven degrees of freedom increase the range of motion. Therefore, pelvic dissection can gain precision and accuracy.

Conclusion

Taking all aspects into consideration, robotic surgery might be a good prognostic factor for oncologic and functional outcome. Further technical developments like robotic single-port platforms might even expand the possibilities of dissection. Superior or equal oncological results and long-term outcomes compared to conventional open or laparoscopic techniques have yet to be examined and should be the subject of future randomized clinical trials.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1324–32.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Je-Ho Jang C‑NK. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: current evidences and future perspectives. Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):293–303.CrossRef Je-Ho Jang C‑NK. Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: current evidences and future perspectives. Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):293–303.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Perez D, Melling N, et al. Robotic low anterior resection versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a comparison of 115 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(2):237–42.CrossRef Perez D, Melling N, et al. Robotic low anterior resection versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a comparison of 115 cases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(2):237–42.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee L, de Lacy B, et al. A multicenter matched comparison of Transanal and robotic total mesorectal excision for mid and low-rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1110–6.CrossRef Lee L, de Lacy B, et al. A multicenter matched comparison of Transanal and robotic total mesorectal excision for mid and low-rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):1110–6.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Achilli P, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer as a platform to build on: review of current evidence. Surg Today. 2021;51:44–51.CrossRef Achilli P, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer as a platform to build on: review of current evidence. Surg Today. 2021;51:44–51.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsuno H, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: operative technique and review of the literatur. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020;4(1):14–24.CrossRef Katsuno H, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: operative technique and review of the literatur. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2020;4(1):14–24.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pötscher A, et al. Robot-assisted esophageal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system: operative technique and initial experiences. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(3):469–74.CrossRef Pötscher A, et al. Robot-assisted esophageal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system: operative technique and initial experiences. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(3):469–74.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.CrossRef Veldkamp R, et al. Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:477–84.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Sun Y, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;1(61):14. Sun Y, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;1(61):14.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne D, Pigazzi A, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRef Jayne D, Pigazzi A, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Corrigan N, et al. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection. Trials. 2018;19(1):339.CrossRef Corrigan N, et al. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection. Trials. 2018;19(1):339.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Morelli L, et al. Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:589–600.CrossRef Morelli L, et al. Robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: case-matched comparison of short-term surgical and functional outcomes between the da Vinci Xi and Si. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:589–600.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Atasoy D, Aytac E. Robotic versus laparoscopic stapler use for rectal transection in robotic surgery for cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(5):501–5.CrossRef Atasoy D, Aytac E. Robotic versus laparoscopic stapler use for rectal transection in robotic surgery for cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(5):501–5.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Eltair M, et al. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:1423–38.CrossRef Eltair M, et al. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision in management of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:1423–38.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, et al. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.CrossRef Heald RJ, et al. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—The clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Heald RJ, Karanjia ND. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 1992;16(5):848–57.CrossRef Heald RJ, Karanjia ND. Results of radical surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg. 1992;16(5):848–57.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Enker WE. Total mesorectal excision—The new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med. 1997;29(2):127–33.CrossRef Enker WE. Total mesorectal excision—The new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med. 1997;29(2):127–33.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim J, et al. Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(3):266–73.CrossRef Kim J, et al. Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017;60(3):266–73.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Aselmann H, et al. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach—Report of a single-center experience. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(11):1575–81.CrossRef Aselmann H, et al. Robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer results in a significantly higher quality of TME specimen compared to the laparoscopic approach—Report of a single-center experience. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33(11):1575–81.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Nocera F, et al. Optimising functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(2):233–50.CrossRef Nocera F, et al. Optimising functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(2):233–50.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences
verfasst von
Bianka Hummel
Anna Nagel
Benjamin Süsoy
Linda Tarantik
Linda Michlmayr
Friedrich Längle
Clemens Bittermann, MD
Publikationsdatum
19.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-021-00733-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

European Surgery 4/2021 Zur Ausgabe