Skip to main content
Log in

Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to quantify the extent of dexterity enhancement in robotic surgery as compared to laparoscopic surgery.

Methods

Ten surgeons with varying laparoscopic suturing experience were asked to place three sutures on a suture pad. The sutures were placed laparoscopically, robotically with 2-D vision and robotically with 3-D vision. The da Vinci system’s Application Programming Interface (API) was used for positional data. A validated motion analysis system was used for data retrieval for the laparoscopic task. Custom software was developed for data analysis.

Results

Compared to laparoscopic suturing, when the task was undertaken robotically with 2-D vision there was a 20% reduction in the time taken but this was not significant (p = 0.07). There was a 55% reduction in the path traveled by the right hand (p = 0.01) and a 45% reduction in the path traveled by the left hand (p = 0.008). When the task was undertaken robotically with 3-D vision, there was a 40% reduction in the time taken (p = 0.01). There was a 70% reduction in the path traveled by right hand (p = 0.008) and a 55% reduction by the left hand (p = 0.08).

Conclusions

The presence of “wristed” instrumentation, tremor abolition, and motion scaling enhance dexterity by nearly 50% as compared to laparoscopic surgery. 3-D vision enhances dexterity by a further 10–15%. In addition, the presence of 3-D vision results in a 93% reduction in skills-based errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R Berguer (1999) ArticleTitleSurgery and ergonomics. Arch Surg 134 1011–1016 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.134.9.1011 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvhsFGnsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10487599

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. R Beurger M Rember D Beckley (1997) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic instruments cause increased forearm fatigue: a subjective and objective comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Min Invasive Ther Allied 6 36–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. GF Buess MO Schurr SC Fischer (2000) ArticleTitleRobotics and allied technologies in endoscopic surgery. Arch Surg 132 229–235 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.135.2.229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A Chan S Chung A Yim J Lau E Ng A Li (1997) ArticleTitleComparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 11 438–440 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649900385 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB1MfhvVw%3D Occurrence Handle9153170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. WK Cheah JE Lenzi J So F Dong CK Kum P Goh (2001) ArticleTitleEvaluation of a head-mounted display (HMD) in the performance of a simulated laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc 15 990–991 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrlvVCrtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11443461

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. B Davies (2000) ArticleTitleA review of robotics in surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng 214 129–140 Occurrence Handle10.1243/0954411001535309 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ot1Ghsg%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A Dosis F Bello T Rockall Y Munz K Moorthy S Martin A Darzi (200x) ArticleTitleROVIMAS: a software package for assessing surgical skills using the da Vinci telemanipulator system. . . .

    Google Scholar 

  8. JE Felger LW Nifong WR Chitwood SuffixJr (2002) ArticleTitleThe evolution of and early experience with robot-assisted mitral valve surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 12 58–63

    Google Scholar 

  9. AG Gallagher RM Satava (2002) ArticleTitleVirtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surg Endosc 16 1746–1752 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-001-8215-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jis1CisA%3D%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. GB Hanna A Cuschieri (2000) ArticleTitleInfluence of two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging on endoscopic bowel suturing. World J Surg 24 444–449 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ntlOqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10706917

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JD Hernandez SD Bann Y Munz K Moorthy V Datta S Martin A Dosis F Bello A Darzi T Rockall (2002) ArticleTitleThe learning curve of a simulated surgical task using the da Vinci telemanipulator system. Br J Surg 89 IssueIDsuppl 17–18 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.89.s.1.9_9.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DB Johns JD Brewer NJ Soper (1996) ArticleTitleThe influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6 191–197 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00019509-199606000-00005 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3s3pvFM%3D Occurrence Handle8743361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. VB Kim WHH Chapman RJ Albrecht et al. (2002) ArticleTitleEarly experience with Telemanipulative Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using da Vinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Technol 12 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  14. MD Mueller C Camartin E Dreher W Hanggi (1999) ArticleTitleThree-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13 469–472 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901014 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3ksVOnuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10227944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Y Munz H Hernandez S Bann F Bello A Dosis S Martin K Moorthy T Rockall A Darzi (2002) ArticleTitleThe advantages of 3D visualization in surgical performance with the Da-Vinci telemaniputation system. J Soc Laparosc Surg 6 264

    Google Scholar 

  16. JA Shea MJ Healey JA Berlin JR Clarke PF Malet RN Staroscik JS Schwartz SV Williams (1996) ArticleTitleMortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 224 609–620 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199611000-00005 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD2svksV0%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. N Taffinder S Smith J Mair et al. (1999) ArticleTitleCan a computer measure surgical precision? Reliability, validity and feasibility of the ICSAD. Surg Endosc 13 IssueIDsuppl 1 81 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004649901107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. LF Williams WC Chapman RA Bonau EC McGee RW Boyd JK Jacobs (1993) ArticleTitleComparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 165 459–465 Occurrence Handle8480882

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. P Yohannes P Rotariu P Pinto AD Smith BR Lee (2002) ArticleTitleComparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology 60 39–45 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(02)01717-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Moorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moorthy, K., Munz, Y., Dosis, A. et al. Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18, 790–795 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8922-2

Keywords

Navigation