Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of surgeon’s postural muscle activity during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study compared the muscular activity in the surgeon’s neck and upper limbs during robotic-assisted laparoscopic (R-Lap) surgery and conventional laparoscopic (C-Lap) surgery. Two surgeons performed the same procedure of R-Lap and C-Lap low anterior resection, and real-time surface electromyography was recorded in bilateral cervical erector spinae, upper trapezius (UT) and anterior deltoid muscles for over 60 min in each procedure. In one surgeon, forearm muscle activities were also recorded during robotic surgery. Similar levels of cervical muscle activity were demonstrated in both types of surgery. One surgeon showed much higher activity in the left UT muscle during robotic surgery. In the second surgeon, C-Lap was associated with much higher levels of muscle activity in both UT muscles. This may be related to the bilateral abducted arm posture required in maneuvering the laparoscopic instruments. In the forearm region, the “ulnaris” muscles for wrist flexion and extension bilaterally showed high amplitudes during robotic-assisted surgery. Robotic-assisted surgery seemed to demand a higher level of muscle work in the forearm region while greater efforts of shoulder muscles were involved during laparoscopic surgery. There are also individual variations in postural habits and motor control that can affect the muscle activation patterns. This study demonstrated a method of objectively examining the surgeon’s physical workload during real-time surgery in the operating theatre, and further research should explore the surgeon’s workload in a larger group of surgeons performing different surgical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Herron DM, Marohn M (2008) A consensus document on robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 22:313–325

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stefanidis D, Wang F, Korndorffer JR Jr, Dunne JB, Scott DJ (2010) Robotic assistance improves introcorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload. Surg Endosc 24:377–382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134:87–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pugin F, Bucher P, Morel P (2011) History of robotic surgery: from AESOP® and ZEUS® to da Vinci®. J Vascular Surg 148:e3–e8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Stylopoulos N, Rattner D (2003) Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin N Am 83:1321–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van der Schatte Olivier RH, van’t Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1365–1371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JWM, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc 20:730–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sumi Y, Dhumane PW, Komeda K, Dallemagne B, Kuroda D, Marescauz J (2012) Learning curves in expert and non-expert laparoscopic surgeons for robotic suturing with the da Vinci® Surgical System. J Robotic Surg. doi:10.1007/s11701-012-0336-5

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szeto GPY, Ho P, Ting ACW, Poon JTC, Cheng SWK, Tsang RCC (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehab 19:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Szeto GPY, Ho P, Ting ACW, Poon JTC, Tsang RCC, Cheng SWK (2010) A study of surgeons’ postural muscle activity during open, laparoscopic and endovascular surgery. Surg Endosc 24(7):1712–1721

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the research assistants Y.Y. Wong and Ted Wong, as without their help this project would not have run so smoothly. We would also like to acknowledge Mr. Raymond Chung from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University for providing expert advice on statistical analysis, and Mr. Man Cheung for technical advice on EMG data collection and analysis.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest nor any financial relationship with any organization whatsoever.

Consent section

Written informed consent has been obtained from the two surgeons who participated in this study. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-chief of this journal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grace P. Y. Szeto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szeto, G.P.Y., Poon, J.T.C. & Law, WL. A comparison of surgeon’s postural muscle activity during robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal surgery. J Robotic Surg 7, 305–308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0374-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-012-0374-z

Keywords

Navigation