Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Surgery 2/2023

01.02.2023 | original article

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of the literature

verfasst von: Mark Portelli, Samuel Attard, Tonio Bezzina

Erschienen in: European Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Introduction

Minimally invasive surgery is gradually becoming the mainstay of surgical treatment. In addition to the current mainstream four-port cholecystectomy, current research has looked upon the possibility of a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC). In this meta-analysis, we aim to compare conventional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of operative time, cosmesis and postoperative pain.

Materials and methods

A literature search was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, using the MESH terms ‘randomised controlled trial’, ‘laparoscopy’, ‘single port’, ‘multi-port’ and ‘cholecystectomy’. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing SILC versus CLC published between January 2010 and January 2021 were included. Data were collected on operative time, cosmesis and postoperative pain visual analogue score (VAS) at 6 and 24 h.

Results

Seven randomised controlled trials were used. When compared to CLC, SILC had comparable operative time (chi2 = 273.78; p < 0.00001; CI −2.19, 24.12; I2 = 98%) and VAS pain score at 6 h (chi2 = 19.77; p < 0.0001; CI −0.49, 0.15; I2 = 90%). CLC had a significantly better cosmetic outcome (chi2 = 16.07; p < 0.0003; CI 0.89, 1.38; I2 = 88%). SILC demonstrated a significantly better VAS pain score at 24 h (chi2 = 45.15; p < 0.00001; CI −0.37, −0.02; I2 = 91%).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that except for improved postoperative pain at 24 h, SILC did not show improved outcomes when compared to CLC. With the presently published RCTs, we are unable to provide statistical analysis on further outcomes such as postoperative complications. Hence, the choice of procedure remains largely the decision of the operating surgeon.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Hauters P, Auvray S, Cardin JL, et al. Comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective trial of the Club Coelio. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1689–94.CrossRefPubMed Hauters P, Auvray S, Cardin JL, et al. Comparison between single-incision and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective trial of the Club Coelio. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1689–94.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:695.PubMed Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997;84:695.PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Deveci U, Barbaros U, Kapakli MS, et al. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;85:275–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deveci U, Barbaros U, Kapakli MS, et al. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;85:275–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma A, Soni V, Baijal M, et al. Single port versus multiple port Laparoscopic cholecystectomy—A comparative study. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(2):115–22.CrossRefPubMed Sharma A, Soni V, Baijal M, et al. Single port versus multiple port Laparoscopic cholecystectomy—A comparative study. Indian J Surg. 2013;75(2):115–22.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Banoria NK, Panwar S, Prakash S, et al. Comparing the operative duration and the pain scores in patients undergoing single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) vs. multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC). J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(75):5568–72.CrossRef Banoria NK, Panwar S, Prakash S, et al. Comparing the operative duration and the pain scores in patients undergoing single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) vs. multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC). J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(75):5568–72.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ganchev G, Saroglu A, Julianov A. Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard 4‑port laparoscopic cholecystectomy—Results from prospective randomised trial and 7 years of follow-up. Trakia J Sci. 2020;18(1):97–102.CrossRef Ganchev G, Saroglu A, Julianov A. Transumbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus standard 4‑port laparoscopic cholecystectomy—Results from prospective randomised trial and 7 years of follow-up. Trakia J Sci. 2020;18(1):97–102.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Klein D, Barutcu AG, Kroll D, et al. Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:551–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein D, Barutcu AG, Kroll D, et al. Randomized controlled trial of single incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy with long-term follow-up. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:551–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Roy A, Datta PN, Guha K. Role of a modified epigastric port in reducing post operative pain and causing early ambulation in a patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to a standard four port procedure, a randomized controlled study. Int Surg J. 2020;7(12):3986–93.CrossRef Roy A, Datta PN, Guha K. Role of a modified epigastric port in reducing post operative pain and causing early ambulation in a patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to a standard four port procedure, a randomized controlled study. Int Surg J. 2020;7(12):3986–93.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Subirana H, Rey FJ, Barri J, et al. Single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory surgery setting: A prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. J Min Access Surg. 2020;17(3):311–7.CrossRef Subirana H, Rey FJ, Barri J, et al. Single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an ambulatory surgery setting: A prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. J Min Access Surg. 2020;17(3):311–7.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, et al. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:4315–29.CrossRefPubMed Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, et al. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:4315–29.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3437–48.CrossRefPubMed Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:3437–48.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S. Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic chole-cystectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(3):339–49.CrossRefPubMed Saad S, Strassel V, Sauerland S. Randomized clinical trial of single-port, minilaparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic chole-cystectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(3):339–49.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Abdelrahman AM, Bingener J, Yu D, et al. Impact of single-incision lap-aroscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and work-load: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1205–11.CrossRefPubMed Abdelrahman AM, Bingener J, Yu D, et al. Impact of single-incision lap-aroscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) procedures on surgeon stress and work-load: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(3):1205–11.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Arezzo A, Passera R, Bullano A, et al. Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2872–80.CrossRefPubMed Arezzo A, Passera R, Bullano A, et al. Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2872–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Pointer R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:367–77.CrossRefPubMed Antoniou SA, Pointer R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:367–77.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kravetz AJ, Iddings D, Basson MD, et al. The learning curve with single-port cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2009;13:332–6.PubMedPubMedCentral Kravetz AJ, Iddings D, Basson MD, et al. The learning curve with single-port cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2009;13:332–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg. 2012;36:2644–53.CrossRefPubMed Sajid MS, Ladwa N, Kalra L, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Meta-analysis and systematic review of randomised controlled trials. World J Surg. 2012;36:2644–53.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, et al. meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1790–801.CrossRefPubMed Pisanu A, Reccia I, Porceddu G, et al. meta-analysis of prospective randomized studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) and conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CMLC). J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16:1790–801.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1296–303.CrossRefPubMed Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, et al. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1296–303.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs. conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of the literature
verfasst von
Mark Portelli
Samuel Attard
Tonio Bezzina
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2023
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2023
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00791-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2023

European Surgery 2/2023 Zur Ausgabe