Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Spektrum der Augenheilkunde 2/2021

Open Access 06.01.2021 | original article

Traumatic open globe injury—epidemiology, risk factors and visual outcome at the University Hospital Aachen

verfasst von: Yassamin Djalali-Talab, Babac Mazinani, MD, Yassin Djalali-Talab, MD, FEBO

Erschienen in: Spektrum der Augenheilkunde | Ausgabe 2/2021

Summary

Background

Ocular trauma is still a major cause leading to enucleation. This study aims to analyze the visual outcome, epidemiology and risk factors of open globe injury (OGI) at the University Hospital Aachen, Germany.

Material and methods

A retrospective analysis of patient records involving traumatic OGI treated surgically between 2005 and 2015 was conducted. Age, gender, cause of accident, ocular trauma score, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at presentation and after treatment as well as location of injury were evaluated.

Results

Of 2272 eyes with trauma, 102 patients with OGI were identified, of which 65% were male and 35% were female. Women were significantly older than men (p < 0.001). The most common cause of injury was domestic syncopal episodes (47%). Work-related injuries occurred exclusively in men in 8.8%. A total of 16% had no light perception (NLP) at presentation, 69% of which improved post intervention to hand movement or better. Endophthalmitis was observed in 4% of all cases. Enucleation was needed mostly due to rupture. Location of OGI, pseudophakia and initial BCVA are risk factors for poor final BCVA. Patients’ BCVA did not improve further after three surgeries.

Conclusion

Traumatic OGI still poses a challenge in terms of treatment planning and prognostic outcome. A rise in elderly patients with multimorbidity represents a secondary obstacle to treatment. Patients with initial NLP can be treated with moderate success. Nevertheless, risk factors and ocular trauma score are unable to provide definitive therapy decisions. OGI should be assessed case by case, taking risk factors for OGI into account. Treating physicians should consider the ethical and economic reasons with regard to whether a high number of surgeries with possible comorbidities is justified.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Ocular trauma is still a major cause leading to 37–60% of all enucleations, next to glaucoma, endophthalmitis and keratitis [1, 2]. It significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, career and self-perception. Ocular trauma has a broad variety of sequelae ranging from full visual acuity and minor aesthetic impacts up to primary or secondary enucleation [3]. Cataract surgery, myopia, higher age and female gender have previously been identified as ocular risk factors [4]. Eye injuries are commonly classified with the Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology System (BETTS) [5] and the Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) [6] to evaluate the prognostic outcome [7].
Causes and epidemiology for open globe injuries (OGI) differ according to geographic region and population. Whereas in Asia work-related injuries account for 43–74% of all OGI [810], the numbers in Europe and the US are 23–34% [10, 11] and 13% [3], respectively. Risk factors for poor outcome include age, endophthalmitis, vitreoretinal trauma, low OTS, no light perception (NLP), latency between injury and surgery and severity of trauma [1216].
The authors aimed to evaluate the demographics, causes and visual outcome of OGI in their patient cohort.

Materials and methods

The medical records of 2272 patients with eye trauma between 2005 and 2015 were reviewed. Subjects with contusion as well as patients receiving only conservative therapy were excluded. The medical charts of 102 traumatic OGI patients that underwent surgical treatment at the University Hospital Aachen, Germany, were retrospectively assessed. Age, gender, accident cause, initial visual acuity and complications were evaluated. Final visual acuity and missing long-term data were collected by surveying referring ophthalmologists in 2016. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) values were converted from decimal to logMAR and special importance ascribed to low vision values [17, 18]. OTS was derived from initial BCVA, rupture, endophthalmitis, perforating injury, retinal detachment (RD) and afferent pupillary deficit. Of those 102 patients, the OTS could be calculated in 88 patients. In 14, OTS was not derivable due to missing clinical data. The location of OGI was categorized as corneal injury (grade I), limbus parallel scleral injury (grade II) or radial scleral injury without or with eye muscle involvement (grade III and IV). Enucleation was not a standard procedure at presentation and was only considered after unsuccessful therapy, chronic pain or for cosmetic reasons.
In agreement with local ethics rules for this type of study, formal consent was not required but patient approval was obtained before surveying referring ophthalmologists.
Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) unless stated otherwise. This research is presented according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines [19].
The incidence rate was calculated using PowerAnalyzer (trinovis GmbH, Hannover, Germany) with data provided by the German Federal Statistical Office (www.​destatis.​de). Population and patient numbers were used to calculate the annual incidence rate. Statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 24.0.0.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical test was chosen depending on the type of variables and data distribution. Graphs were plotted with GraphPad Prism for Windows, version 6.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) or Microsoft Excel for Windows, version 2020 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA).

Results

Patient demographics

In 2016, the authors’ tertiary care center was within reach of 1,303,617 people. A total of 102 patients were identified with traumatic OGI over a 10-year period, leading to an incidence rate of 0.8 cases/100,000 people per year. Follow-up was 26.1 ± 29.0 months.
Gender distribution is presented in Fig. 1, with 65% being male and 35% female (Table 1). Men were significantly younger than women (46.7 ± 20.9 vs. 79.6 ± 16.3 years; t-test, p = 0.001).
Table 1
Patient characteristics (n = 102)
Variables
Frequency (n)
Sex
Male
66
Female
36
Age
≤50
36
≥51
66
Type of injury
Rupture (all)
81
Rupture (blunt force)
40
Perforating/penetrating injury w/o IOFB
8
Penetrating injury with IOFB
13
Location of injury
Grade I
30
Grade II
28
Grade III
18
Grade IV
18
Lens status at presentation
Pseudophakic
26
Other
76
Type of IOFB
Metal
7
Wood
1
Glass
3
Other
2
IOFB intraocular foreign body
Table 2
Statistical analysis of visual outcome
 
At presentation
Last follow-up
p-Value
All patients
BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
2.16 ± 0.86
101
1.53 ± 1.1
102
0.000*
Treated with silicone oil
BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
2.59 ± 0.48
42
2.09 ± 0.85
42
0.000*
 
Pseudophakic at presentation
All other
p-Value
At presentation
BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
2.37 ± 0.75
26
2.09 ± 0.89
68
0.16 ns
Last follow-up
BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
1.96 ± 0.89
26
1.41 ± 1.13
72
0.03*
 
Penetrating injury by wood, plastic, glass
Rupture by blunt force
p-Value
Last follow-up
Mean BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
1.31 ± 1.15
52
1.80 ± 0.97
40
0.07 ns
 
Penetrating injury by metal
All other
p-Value
Last follow-up
Ø BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
0.55 ± 0.98
16
1.74 ± 1.01
76
0.000*
 
Tissue prolapse at presentation
No prolapse
p-Value
Last follow-up
BCVA ± SD (logMAR)
n
1.54 ± 0.81
76
1.26 ± 1.10
12
0.29 ns
n = 102, missing data results in smaller numbers
BCVA Best corrected visual acuity, ns Non-significant
*t-test, significant when p < 0.05
Table 3
Correlation of Ocular Trauma Score (OTS) to final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OTS to total number of surgeries
 
Final BCVA
No. of surgeries
OTS score
Correlation coefficient
−0.686*
−0.370*
p-Value
0.000**
0.000**
n
88
86
Spearman correlation, n = 102
*Negative correlation, **significant at p < 0.05
Most patients were injured due to accidental falling or syncopal episodes (47%). Common injuries were on a construction site or at work (22%; Fig. 2). Other individual causes were hooks, tension belts, fireworks, bursting firewood or iatrogenic injection. The most common perforating or penetrating items were metallic (16%) like nail and tool splinters, wooden (6%) like wood shavings and glass (14%) like broken bottles and shattered eyeglasses. Rupture injury was mostly due to blunt force (41%). Wood, plastic or glass caused similar poor visual outcome compared to injuries by blunt force or rupture (t-test, p = 0.07) (see Table 2).

Location of open globe injury

The present data show a correlation between higher grade (grade III and IV) injuries to worse final visual acuity, a higher number of surgeries and retinal detachment (RD) (Spearman correlation: final BCVA: p < 0.0001; number of surgeries: p < 0.0001; RD: p < 0.0001) (see Table 2). In all, 26.5% of patients had pseudophakia at presentation with a mean age of 78.54 ± 10.2 years. Phaco incision site was a predilection site for rupture in only 10%.

Tissue prolapse

Prolapse of vitreous occurred in 25%, of iris in 32% and lens expulsion in 4.5%. Undefined prolapse was found in 25%. Of all patients, 11.8% had no prolapse. Vitreous prolapse led to RD in 46% of those patients and increased the number of surgeries by a factor of 18% compared to all patients. This resulted in a final mean BCVA of 1.54 ± 0.81 logMAR which did not differ significantly (see Table 2).

Outcome

Fig. 3 illustrates the correlation of initial to final BCVA. As can be seen, most patients improved with treatment, but 15 patients worsened (above the interrupted line). Initial mean BCVA improved from 2.16 ± 0.86 to 1.5 ± 1.1 (t-test, p < 0.000). Patients with pseudophakia at presentation had a significantly worse final visual outcome (t-test, p = 0.03), although their initial BCVA did not differ (t-test, p = 0.16) (see Table 2).

Initial NLP

Five out of sixteen (31%) patients had initial NLP and did not improve despite treatment, whereas 11 improved (69%) to counting fingers (CF) or hand movement (HM) (logMAR 2–2.1). One case did exceedingly well with an improvement of −2.48 logMAR. The mean number of surgeries was 3.0 ± 2.1. RD occurred in 69%, phthisis in 25% and enucleation in 19%. Three of four enucleations had initial NLP.

Final NLP

All 10 patients with final NLP had initial BCVA of HM or worse. Rupture was the cause in nine of 10 cases, and one case had an intraocular foreign body which resulted in endophthalmitis.
There was a correlation between OTS and final BCVA (Spearman, −0.86, p < 0.000). Of 43 patients with an OTS score of 1, only nine patients (22%) had a final BCVA of NLP.

Therapy

All patients received primary surgical repair and foreign body removal where needed. The mean number of surgeries was 2.85 per patient. In all, 70% of patients needed further surgical therapy other than primary surgical repair. Visual acuity reached a plateau after four surgeries (Fig. 4).
Vitrectomy was performed in 55% of cases and silicone oil endotamponade due to RD was applied in 46%. Those patients receiving silicone oil endotamponade showed significant improvement in BCVA (t-test, p < 0.000). Four patients needed enucleation.
Patients remained aphakic in 36%, pseudophakic in 43% and phakic in 21% after treatment. There was a significant correlation between OTS score 1 and increased numbers of surgeries (Spearman, −0,370, p = 0.000) (see Table 3).

Endophthalmitis

A total of four cases (4%) with endophthalmitis were reported. All patients were treated with vitrectomy and intraocular antibiotics. Two patients resulted in NLP and one patient needed enucleation due to severe inflammation not amenable to treatment.
Sympathetic ophthalmia did not occur in the present study.

Discussion

This study aims to provide an overview of surgically treated OGI at the RWTH Aachen University Hospital and assess the current medical care there compared to the literature.

Epidemiology

The current study identified two age peaks for men: one between 20–40 years, which is usually working age and accounts predominantly for work and spare time injuries, and a second peak between 60–80 years. Women were affected almost exclusively above the age of 60 and mostly by syncopal episodes. Toride et al. described a similar age and gender distribution for Japan, a country with a comparable demographic and economic setting to Germany [20].
In contrast to the present results, previous papers as well as the literature from developing countries detected only a single peak for patients (10–50 years) and a higher male-to-female ratio [810, 13, 21, 22]. For example, Kuhn et al. analyzed the United States Eye Injury database (USEIR) and discovered that 81% of all patients were male and that both genders were single-peaked (m: 20–60 years, f: 70–80 years). This might be because the USEIR includes data of military personnel, which are obviously younger in age. In an older study in Germany, Schrader also found 84% male patients (male:female = 5.9:1) and only 9% of OGI in elderly patients, which might reflect worse work safety standards 20 years ago on the one hand [11]. On the other, demographic change has also affected the incidence of OGI in elderly patients in Germany [23, 24]. To the best of the authors’ knowledge this is the first study to clarify that male predominance has decreased in recent decades (male:female = 1.8:1). Based on the data presented here, a shifting of the first peak towards a higher second peak for both genders can be expected. Thus, one can expect to see increasing numbers of older patients with less male predominance.
The authors’ annual incidence rate for hospitalized OGI (per 100,000/year) of 0.8 was significantly lower compared to 3.7 in the US [25], 3.1 in Israel [26], 6.0 in Sweden [10] and 12.6 in Singapore [13]. Patients’ economic status and educational level were not evaluated. Both factors might impact the low incidence rate found in the current study.
Follow-up times showed great variance as most patients were referred to the authors’ tertiary center only for surgical treatment, and data supplied by ophthalmologists were incomplete in several patients. Reasons for loss of follow-up were death, relocation or change of treating ophthalmologist.

Mechanism of injury

In the present study, penetration by metal items had the best final visual outcome (t-test, p < 0.000), which occurred mostly in men (87.5%). In previous studies, metal objects were the main cause of injury in 32.4–72.7% [27, 28]. Although metal items have been identified as the causative factor for posterior OGI in young men [16], former studies have also reported that penetrating injuries resulted in better visual results [27]. These findings suggest that visual outcome depends on the mechanism of injury as well as the material of IOFB. One possible reason might be that metal splinters tend to be sharp and perforate the cornea or sclera with less trauma. Depending on the velocity of the IOFB, the penetration depth results in varying damage. Although size of IOFB was not assessed in this study, previous studies have shown a strong correlation to final vision [27, 29].
Women were frequently injured after syncopal episodes, which occurred exclusively at home or during leisure time activities. An increase in domestic OGI was also noted by Schrader in 2004. Domestic injury rates were found to be as high as 71% [22, 30].
Work-related OGI occurred in 8.8% of cases, which is lower compared to other studies (34–49%) [8, 10]. The incidence of work-related injuries might depend on working safety standards and socioeconomic factors not evaluated here. Gender imbalance in work-related injuries was striking in the current study. The authors did not find a single female patient with a work-related injury. This imbalance was also previously found by others [8, 20].
The main mechanism of injury resulting in enucleation was rupture (75%). This was also shown by Savar and several other authors [11, 15, 27, 31].

Risk factors

The actual existence of risk factors for poor visual outcome in OGI patients has been questioned by Page et al. [12]. While many have acknowledged the existence of risk factors for poor visual outcome, others have rejected this.
In their study, the authors evaluated the following risk factors: location of injury, vitreous prolapse, pseudophakia at presentation and initial BCVA including NLP patients.
They found that radial scleral injury with or without eye muscle involvement had a significant impact on final visual outcome, which is in line with the previous literature [14, 15, 27].
Furthermore, patients with or without vitreous prolapse (25% vs 75%) did not differ in visual outcome, although the former needed more surgical procedures, including vitrectomy.
The role of pseudophakia at presentation has been discussed with contradictory results [27, 32]. While cataract surgery has evolved in recent decades, its leading role in eye ruptures has decreased due to the small self-sealing incisions used in modern cataract surgery from 40% of all OGI in 1985 [11] to 10% in the present study.
In line with the previous literature, the data presented here outline pseudophakia as a risk factor for poor visual outcome. However, as the percentage of pseudophakia and the number of syncopal episodes and multimorbidity increase with age, this result might be biased.
Many previous studies have shown a correlation between initial BCVA to final BCVA [7, 14, 25, 26, 28, 33]. However, the authors found a group of interest that had visual impairment after treatment (n = 14). In general, the impairment was statistically non-significant (t-test, p = 0.09). Nevertheless, they want to point out the highly individual course which may result in a worse visual outcome. Of those 14 patients, four had endophthalmitis, three had only minimal visual impairment, which may be due to error in measurement, two had phthisis and two had retinal detachment. Three patients received only primary reconstruction due to age (>88 years) and multimorbidity.

Ocular Trauma Score and no light perception

The OTS was introduced as an alternative to predict the visual outcome of OGI patients. The authors showed a significant correlation between OTS and visual outcome. However, effective prediction of the outcome remains uncertain. Kuhn et al. stated that OTS 1 has a 75% probability to have NLP as final BCVA [6]. In the authors’ dataset, only 22% of OTS 1 had NLP as final outcome. In addition, their data showed an improvement for 69% of all NLP patients up to a BCVA of 0.73 logMAR.
Therefore, they conclude that conventional risk factors and OTS are insufficient to guide whether or not to proceed with further therapy. They propose deciding on a case-by-case basis and performing therapy if socioeconomic circumstances permit.
In line with the authors’ results, Soni et al. found that NLP is a risk factor for poor visual outcome [34]. NLP is often associated with severe ocular tissue destruction, including the retina or optic nerve. The current patient cohort did surprisingly well with 69% improving up to CF or HM. Han et al. reported that 11.1% reached a final BCVA of light perception or better [35].

Therapy

Fig. 4 shows that after three surgeries, patients have no further improvement and reach a plateau vision of about 2 logMAR, which equals hand motion. Gursoy et al. found that number of surgeries did not have a significant effect on final BCVA [36]. Therefore, surgical procedures should be considered especially with regard to patient age, condition and risk of general anesthesia.
A prospective randomized study would be preferable, but might fail due to low numbers or inhomogeneous patient characteristics.

Conclusion

OGI is common in young working males and female seniors. The authors expect an increase in OGI for seniors in the future.
It is still difficult to predict the outcome, even if risk factors and OTS can be used to gain a general idea. The treatment of OGI remains a challenge that needs to be assessed individually.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Conflict of interest

Y. Djalali-Talab, B. Mazinani, and Y. Djalali-Talab declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

For this article no studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors. All studies mentioned were in accordance with the ethical standards indicated in each case. For this retrospective study formal consent for participation/publication is not required. This was approved by the local ethics committee (CTC-A-20-541).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Abo für kostenpflichtige Inhalte

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Balta O, Acar U, Akbas Kocaoglu F, Ornek F. Review of 306 evisceration surgeries performed between 2005 and 2013. Turk J Med Sci. 2016;46(2):463–7.PubMedCrossRef Balta O, Acar U, Akbas Kocaoglu F, Ornek F. Review of 306 evisceration surgeries performed between 2005 and 2013. Turk J Med Sci. 2016;46(2):463–7.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Walter P, Rossler G, Mazinani B. Trauma with involvement of the posterior segment of the eye—part 1. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2013;230(5):539–48. quiz 49–50.PubMedCrossRef Walter P, Rossler G, Mazinani B. Trauma with involvement of the posterior segment of the eye—part 1. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2013;230(5):539–48. quiz 49–50.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Viestenz A, Schrader W, Kuchle M, Walter S, Behrens-Baumann W. Management of a ruptured globe. Ophthalmologe. 2008;105(12):1163–74. quiz 75.PubMedCrossRef Viestenz A, Schrader W, Kuchle M, Walter S, Behrens-Baumann W. Management of a ruptured globe. Ophthalmologe. 2008;105(12):1163–74. quiz 75.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):240–3.PubMedCrossRef Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Heimann K, Jeffers JB, Treister G. A standardized classification of ocular trauma. Ophthalmology. 1996;103(2):240–3.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. The ocular trauma score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002;15(2):163–5.PubMedCrossRef Kuhn F, Maisiak R, Mann L, Mester V, Morris R, Witherspoon CD. The ocular trauma score (OTS). Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2002;15(2):163–5.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu Wai Man C, Steel D. Visual outcome after open globe injury: a comparison of two prognostic models—the ocular trauma score and the classification and regression tree. Eye (Lond). 2010;24(1):84–9.CrossRef Yu Wai Man C, Steel D. Visual outcome after open globe injury: a comparison of two prognostic models—the ocular trauma score and the classification and regression tree. Eye (Lond). 2010;24(1):84–9.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang CH, Chen CL, Ho CK, Lai YH, Hu RC, Yen YL. Hospitalized eye injury in a large industrial city of South-Eastern Asia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(2):223–8.PubMedCrossRef Chang CH, Chen CL, Ho CK, Lai YH, Hu RC, Yen YL. Hospitalized eye injury in a large industrial city of South-Eastern Asia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;246(2):223–8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu M, Ye J. Hospitalized eye injury in a Chinese urban population: a 7-year retrospective analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(2):179–81.PubMedPubMedCentral Wu M, Ye J. Hospitalized eye injury in a Chinese urban population: a 7-year retrospective analysis. Int J Ophthalmol. 2010;3(2):179–81.PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Sahraravand A, Haavisto AK, Holopainen JM, Leivo T. Ocular traumas in working age adults in Finland—Helsinki ocular trauma study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):288–94.PubMedCrossRef Sahraravand A, Haavisto AK, Holopainen JM, Leivo T. Ocular traumas in working age adults in Finland—Helsinki ocular trauma study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95(3):288–94.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Viestenz A, Kuchle M. Retrospective analysis of 417 cases of contusion and rupture of the globe with frequent avoidable causes of trauma: the Erlangen ocular contusion-registry (EOCR) 1985–1995. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218(10):662–9.PubMedCrossRef Viestenz A, Kuchle M. Retrospective analysis of 417 cases of contusion and rupture of the globe with frequent avoidable causes of trauma: the Erlangen ocular contusion-registry (EOCR) 1985–1995. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2001;218(10):662–9.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Page RD, Gupta SK, Jenkins TL, Karcioglu ZA. Risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with open-globe injuries. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1461–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Page RD, Gupta SK, Jenkins TL, Karcioglu ZA. Risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with open-globe injuries. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1461–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Epidemiology of blinding trauma in the United States eye injury registry. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(3):209–16.PubMedCrossRef Kuhn F, Morris R, Witherspoon CD, Mann L. Epidemiology of blinding trauma in the United States eye injury registry. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13(3):209–16.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng K, Hu Y, Wang C, Shen L, Pang X, Jiang Y, et al. Risk factors, anatomical, and visual outcomes of injured eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: eye injury vitrectomy study. Retina. 2013;33(8):1512–8.PubMedCrossRef Feng K, Hu Y, Wang C, Shen L, Pang X, Jiang Y, et al. Risk factors, anatomical, and visual outcomes of injured eyes with proliferative vitreoretinopathy: eye injury vitrectomy study. Retina. 2013;33(8):1512–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Feng K, Hu YT, Ma Z. Prognostic indicators for no light perception after open-globe injury: eye injury vitrectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(4):654–662.e2.PubMedCrossRef Feng K, Hu YT, Ma Z. Prognostic indicators for no light perception after open-globe injury: eye injury vitrectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(4):654–662.e2.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Knyazer B, Levy J, Rosen S, Belfair N, Klemperer I, Lifshitz T. Prognostic factors in posterior open globe injuries (zone-III injuries). Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(9):836–41.PubMedCrossRef Knyazer B, Levy J, Rosen S, Belfair N, Klemperer I, Lifshitz T. Prognostic factors in posterior open globe injuries (zone-III injuries). Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008;36(9):836–41.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lange C, Feltgen N, Junker B, Schulze-Bonsel K, Bach M. Resolving the clinical acuity categories “hand motion” and “counting fingers” using the Freiburg visual acuity test (FrACT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(1):137–42.PubMedCrossRef Lange C, Feltgen N, Junker B, Schulze-Bonsel K, Bach M. Resolving the clinical acuity categories “hand motion” and “counting fingers” using the Freiburg visual acuity test (FrACT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247(1):137–42.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Toride A, Toshida H, Matsui A, Matsuzaki Y, Honda R, Ohta T, et al. Visual outcome after emergency surgery for open globe eye injury in Japan. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1731–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Toride A, Toshida H, Matsui A, Matsuzaki Y, Honda R, Ohta T, et al. Visual outcome after emergency surgery for open globe eye injury in Japan. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1731–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller F. Relationship of age to eye injuries. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1968;19(73):157–74.PubMed Muller F. Relationship of age to eye injuries. Bibl Ophthalmol. 1968;19(73):157–74.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schrader WF. Epidemiology of open globe eye injuries: analysis of 1026 cases in 18 years. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221(8):629–35.PubMedCrossRef Schrader WF. Epidemiology of open globe eye injuries: analysis of 1026 cases in 18 years. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004;221(8):629–35.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Leivo T, Haavisto AK, Sahraravand A. Sports-related eye injuries: the current picture. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(3):224–31.PubMedCrossRef Leivo T, Haavisto AK, Sahraravand A. Sports-related eye injuries: the current picture. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(3):224–31.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehto KS, Sulander PO, Tervo TM. Do motor vehicle airbags increase risk of ocular injuries in adults? Ophthalmology. 2003;110(6):1082–8.PubMedCrossRef Lehto KS, Sulander PO, Tervo TM. Do motor vehicle airbags increase risk of ocular injuries in adults? Ophthalmology. 2003;110(6):1082–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith AR, O’Hagan SB, Gole GA. Epidemiology of open- and closed-globe trauma presenting to Cairns Base Hospital, Queensland. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(3):252–9.PubMedCrossRef Smith AR, O’Hagan SB, Gole GA. Epidemiology of open- and closed-globe trauma presenting to Cairns Base Hospital, Queensland. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;34(3):252–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Knyazer B, Bilenko N, Levy J, Lifshitz T, Belfair N, Klemperer I, et al. Open globe eye injury characteristics and prognostic factors in southern Israel: a retrospective epidemiologic review of 10 years experience. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013;15(3):158–62.PubMed Knyazer B, Bilenko N, Levy J, Lifshitz T, Belfair N, Klemperer I, et al. Open globe eye injury characteristics and prognostic factors in southern Israel: a retrospective epidemiologic review of 10 years experience. Isr Med Assoc J. 2013;15(3):158–62.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujikawa A, Mohamed YH, Kinoshita H, Matsumoto M, Uematsu M, Tsuiki E, et al. Visual outcomes and prognostic factors in open-globe injuries. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):138.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fujikawa A, Mohamed YH, Kinoshita H, Matsumoto M, Uematsu M, Tsuiki E, et al. Visual outcomes and prognostic factors in open-globe injuries. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18(1):138.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Soylu M, Sizmaz S, Cayli S. Eye injury (ocular trauma) in southern Turkey: epidemiology, ocular survival, and visual outcome. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(2):143–8.PubMedCrossRef Soylu M, Sizmaz S, Cayli S. Eye injury (ocular trauma) in southern Turkey: epidemiology, ocular survival, and visual outcome. Int Ophthalmol. 2010;30(2):143–8.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu Y, Wang S, Li Y, Gong Q, Su G, Zhao J. Intraocular foreign bodies: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing visual outcome and globe survival in 373 eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:5208092.PubMedPubMedCentral Liu Y, Wang S, Li Y, Gong Q, Su G, Zhao J. Intraocular foreign bodies: clinical characteristics and prognostic factors influencing visual outcome and globe survival in 373 eyes. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:5208092.PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Falcao M, Camisa E, Falcao-Reis F. Characteristics of open-globe injuries in northwestern Portugal. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(6):389–94.PubMedCrossRef Falcao M, Camisa E, Falcao-Reis F. Characteristics of open-globe injuries in northwestern Portugal. Ophthalmologica. 2010;224(6):389–94.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Savar A, Andreoli MT, Kloek CE, Andreoli CM. Enucleation for open globe injury. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(4):595–600.e1.PubMedCrossRef Savar A, Andreoli MT, Kloek CE, Andreoli CM. Enucleation for open globe injury. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147(4):595–600.e1.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kavoussi SC, Slade MD, Meskin SW, Adelman RA. Characteristics and outcomes of fall-related open-globe injuries in pseudophakic patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:403–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kavoussi SC, Slade MD, Meskin SW, Adelman RA. Characteristics and outcomes of fall-related open-globe injuries in pseudophakic patients. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:403–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rouberol F, Denis P, Romanet JP, Chiquet C. Comparative study of 50 early- or late-onset retinal detachments after open or closed globe injury. Retina. 2011;31(6):1143–9.PubMedCrossRef Rouberol F, Denis P, Romanet JP, Chiquet C. Comparative study of 50 early- or late-onset retinal detachments after open or closed globe injury. Retina. 2011;31(6):1143–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Soni NG, Bauza AM, Son JH, Langer PD, Zarbin MA, Bhagat N. Open globe ocular trauma: functional outcome of eyes with no light perception at initial presentation. Retina. 2013;33(2):380–6.PubMedCrossRef Soni NG, Bauza AM, Son JH, Langer PD, Zarbin MA, Bhagat N. Open globe ocular trauma: functional outcome of eyes with no light perception at initial presentation. Retina. 2013;33(2):380–6.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Han SB, Yu HG. Visual outcome after open globe injury and its predictive factors in Korea. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):E66–72.PubMed Han SB, Yu HG. Visual outcome after open globe injury and its predictive factors in Korea. J Trauma. 2010;69(5):E66–72.PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Gursoy H, Bilgec MD, Sahin A, Colak E. A possible regression equation for predicting visual outcomes after surgical repair of open globe injuries. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1320457.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Gursoy H, Bilgec MD, Sahin A, Colak E. A possible regression equation for predicting visual outcomes after surgical repair of open globe injuries. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1320457.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Traumatic open globe injury—epidemiology, risk factors and visual outcome at the University Hospital Aachen
verfasst von
Yassamin Djalali-Talab
Babac Mazinani, MD
Yassin Djalali-Talab, MD, FEBO
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2021
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
Spektrum der Augenheilkunde / Ausgabe 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-4282
Elektronische ISSN: 1613-7523
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00717-020-00480-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2021

Spektrum der Augenheilkunde 2/2021 Zur Ausgabe