Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

05.12.2018 | original article | Ausgabe 7-8/2019 Open Access

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 7-8/2019

Comparison of native myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers

Reference values and clinical implications

Zeitschrift:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift > Ausgabe 7-8/2019
Autoren:
Marcel Granitz, Lukas J. Motloch, Christina Granitz, Matthias Meissnitzer, Wolfgang Hitzl, Klaus Hergan, Alexander Schlattau
Wichtige Hinweise
M. Granitz and A. Schlattau contributed equally to this work.

Summary

Background

Myocardial native T1 and T2 mapping are promising techniques for quantitative assessment of diffuse myocardial pathologies; however, due to conflicting data regarding normal values, routine clinical implementation of this method is still challenging.

Methods

To evaluate this situation during daily clinical practice the characteristics of normal values obtained in 60 healthy volunteers who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans on 1.5T and 3T scanners were studied. The T1 modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI; 5(3)3; modified for higher heart rates) and T2 navigator gated black-blood prepared gradient-spin-echo (GraSE) sequences were used.

Results

While age and body mass index did not affect relaxation times, a gender and heart rate dependency was found showing higher T1 and T2 values in females, whereas at higher heart rates a prolongation of T1 and a shortening of T2 relaxation times was found. Particularly prone to artifacts were T2 measurements at 3T and the inferolateral wall. In the individual setting mean relaxation times for T1 were 995.8 ± 30.9 ms at 1.5T and 1183.8 ± 37.5 ms at 3T and 55.8 ± 2.8 ms at 1.5T and 51.6 ± 3 ms at 3T for T2 indicating a high dependency of reference values on MRI protocol when compared to the literature. Furthermore, as presumed mean T1 and T2 values correlated in the same individual.

Conclusions

The T1 and T2 relaxation times depend on physiological factors and especially on MRI protocols. Therefore, reference values should be validated individually in every radiological institution before implementing mapping protocols in daily clinical practice. Correlation of mean T1 and T2 values in the same proband at both field strengths indicates intraindividual reproducibility.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7-8/2019

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 7-8/2019 Zur Ausgabe

MUW researcher of the month

MUW researcher of the month