A systematic evaluation of three different cardiac T2-mapping sequences at 1.5 and 3T in healthy volunteers
Section snippets
Background
Myocardial oedema is a characteristic diagnostic finding in acute cardiac pathologies such as myocarditis or myocardial infarction. Cardiac T2-mapping has been suggested as a quantitative approach to oedema imaging, overcoming some of the known limitations of qualitative oedema assessment [1], [2], [3]. Accordingly, it may lead to a more objective image interpretation and allow for a more sensitive detection of either diffuse or even subtle changes in myocardial T2 relaxation times, especially
Phantom experiments
Phantom experiments were performed at 1.5T (Achieva 1.5T, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) and 3T (Ingenia 3T, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) using a commercially available cylindrical gel phantom (Eurospin test object TO5, Diagnostic Sonar, Livingston, UK) comprising 12 samples with T1 ranging from 313 ms to 1556 ms and T2 ranging from 50 ms to 160 ms, respectively. Mean T2 and standard deviations were measured at 1.5T and 3T in a homogeneous area of the sample
Phantom experiments
The detailed results of the phantom experiments are shown in Supplemental material 1. Phantom experiments showed that T2 relaxation times were generally higher at 1.5T compared to 3T for all sequences (p = 0.008 for MESE, p < 0.001 for T2prep and GraSE). At 1.5T, significantly higher T2 values were measured using T2prep and GraSE when compared to the MESE sequence (p < 0.001 for both). Conversely, GraSE and MESE resulted in nearly the same T2 relaxation times at 3T (p = 0.584), whereas T2 times
Discussion
To our best knowledge, this is the first study to systematically compare three different T2-mapping sequences at 1.5 and 3T in a phantom and in 30 healthy volunteers, revealing significant variations for derived T2 values depending on the sequence used. In addition, we observed significant differences of mean T2 times for different field strengths. These observations underline the need for dedicated reference values for each T2-mapping sequence at different field strengths. Hence, means and
Conclusions
Myocardial T2-mapping is technically feasible in healthy volunteers, although significant differences of derived mean T2 values can be found when applying different sequence designs and field strengths. Our observations make respective segmental reference values for different field strengths mandatory for diagnostic decision-making. Therefore, the present study offers first segmental reference values for three different cardiac T2-mapping sequences at 1.5 and 3T. The higher pixel-by-pixel
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Stehning and Dr. Schnackenburg are employees of Philips Research and Philips Healthcare, respectively. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the technicians Denise Vossler and Claudia Müller for assisting in acquiring the CMR data.
References (27)
- et al.
T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema
J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.
(2009) - et al.
Variability and homogeneity of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial T2-mapping in volunteers compared to patients with edema
J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.
(2013) - et al.
Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury
JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging
(2011) - et al.
Improved detection of myocardial involvement in acute inflammatory cardiomyopathies using T2 mapping
Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging
(2012) - et al.
Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping at 3 T: reference values, influencing factors and implications
J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.
(2013) - et al.
T2 measurement of the human myocardium using a T2-prepared transient-state TrueFISP sequence
Magn. Reson. Med.
(2007) - et al.
Myocardial T2-mapping and velocity mapping: changes in regional left ventricular structure and function after heart transplantation
Magn. Reson. Med.
(2013) - et al.
Gradient spin echo (GraSE) imaging for fast myocardial T2 mapping
J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.
(2015) - et al.
GRASE (gradient- and spin-echo) MR imaging: a new fast clinical imaging technique
Radiology
(1991) - et al.
Effect of binge drinking on the heart as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
(2010)
Effect of aerobic capacity on the T(2) increase in exercised skeletal muscle
J. Appl. Physiol.
Sub-clinical systolic dysfunction with persistent myocardial edema and inflammation in elite high-endurance athletes with common colds: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.
Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3. 0 T: initial clinical experience
Radiology
Cited by (78)
Complex multi-dimensional integration for T<inf>2</inf>* and R<inf>2</inf>* mapping
2024, Magnetic Resonance ImagingReference ranges of myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in healthy Chinese adults: a multicenter 3T cardiovascular magnetic resonance study
2023, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceT<inf>2</inf> and T<inf>2</inf><sup>⁎</sup> mapping and weighted imaging in cardiac MRI
2022, Magnetic Resonance ImagingCitation Excerpt :A TR ranging from 2–4 RR intervals is used to allow sufficient T1 recovery, reducing T1 influence, otherwise T2 map distortion can result [41]. Like T2WI, T2 mapping can be achieved using BB sequences such as TSE [43,44], multi-echo spin echo (MESE)[45], gradient spin echo[46] (GraSE), or T2-prepared bSSFP [39] which is the commonest method used in clinical practice since it has showed a greater accuracy compared to other methods [41], is less prone to artifacts and flow related signal loss [34] and is highly reproducible [47] (Table 1). The latter starts with a T2-preparatory phase employed to generate T2 weighted contrast [31].
Multi-site comparison of parametric T1 and T2 mapping: healthy travelling volunteers in the Berlin research network for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (BER-CMR)
2023, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic ResonanceDeveloping a medical device-grade T<inf>2</inf> phantom optimized for myocardial T<inf>2</inf> mapping by cardiovascular magnetic resonance
2023, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance