Skip to main content
main-content

Tipp

Weitere Artikel dieser Ausgabe durch Wischen aufrufen

03.03.2022 | original article

eSurgery—digital transformation in surgery, surgical education and training: survey analysis of the status quo in Germany

verfasst von: Juliane Kröplin, Tobias Huber, Christian Geis, Benedikt Braun, Tobias Fritz

Erschienen in: European Surgery

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
share
TEILEN

Summary

Background

In surgery, electronic healthcare systems offer numerous options to improve patient care. The aim of this study was to analyse the current status of digitalisation and its influence in surgery, with a special focus on surgical education and training.

Methods

An individually created questionnaire was used to analyse the subjective assessment of the digitalisation processes in clinical surgery. The online questionnaire consisted of 16 questions regarding the importance and the corresponding implementation of the teaching content: big data, health apps, messenger apps, telemedicine, data protection/IT security, ethics, simulator training, economics and e‑Learning were included. The participation link was sent to members of the German Society of Surgery via the e‑Mail distribution list.

Results

In total, 119 surgeons (response rate = 19.8%) took part in the survey: 18.5% of them were trainees (TR), and 81.5% had already completed specialist training (SP). Overall, 66.4% confirmed a positive influence of digitalisation on the quality of patient care. The presence of a surgical robot was confirmed by 47.9% of the participants. A further 22.0% (n = 26) of the participants confirmed the possibility of using virtual simulators. According to 79.0% of the participants, the integration of digital technologies in surgical education for basic and advanced stage surgeons should be aimed for. Data protection (1.7) and e‑Learning (1.7) were rated as the most important teaching content. The greatest discrepancy between importance and implementation was seen in the teaching content of big data (mean: 2.2–3.8).

Conclusion

The results of the survey reveal the particular importance of digitalisation content for surgery, surgical education and training. At the same time, the results underline the desire for increased integration of digital competence teaching. The data also show an overall more progressive and optimistic perception of TR. In order to meet the challenges of the digital transformation, the implementation of suitable curricula, including virtual simulation-based training and blended-learning teaching concepts, should be emphasised.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO. Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. 2019. WHO. Recommendations on digital interventions for health system strengthening. 2019.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn S, Kadioglu D, Deutsch K, Michl S. Data literacy in medicine. What competence does a physician need? Onkologe. 2018;24:368–77. CrossRef Kuhn S, Kadioglu D, Deutsch K, Michl S. Data literacy in medicine. What competence does a physician need? Onkologe. 2018;24:368–77. CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn S. Medizin im digitalen Zeitalter: Transformation durch Bildung. Dtsch Arztebl. 2018;115(14):A 633–8. Kuhn S. Medizin im digitalen Zeitalter: Transformation durch Bildung. Dtsch Arztebl. 2018;115(14):A 633–8.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau F, Yang J, Pereira J, Daeninck P, Aherne M. A survey of PDA use by palliative medicine practitioners. J Palliat Care. 2006;22(4):267–74. CrossRefPubMed Lau F, Yang J, Pereira J, Daeninck P, Aherne M. A survey of PDA use by palliative medicine practitioners. J Palliat Care. 2006;22(4):267–74. CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn S. Medizin im digitalen Zeitalter: Transformation durch Bildung. Dtsch Arztebl. 2018;115(14):A-633–C-552. Kuhn S. Medizin im digitalen Zeitalter: Transformation durch Bildung. Dtsch Arztebl. 2018;115(14):A-633–C-552.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Foadi N, et al. Welche digitalen Kompetenzen braucht ein Arzt. Dtsch Arztebl. 2020;117(12):A 596–600. Foadi N, et al. Welche digitalen Kompetenzen braucht ein Arzt. Dtsch Arztebl. 2020;117(12):A 596–600.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson R, et al. Health informatics: an interprofessional approach. Health informatics: an interprofessional approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. Nelson R, et al. Health informatics: an interprofessional approach. Health informatics: an interprofessional approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Potschka J. Frauenanteil Chirurgie: Frauen planen in Etappen. Dtsch Arztebl. 2014;111(27–28):A-1246–C-1017. Potschka J. Frauenanteil Chirurgie: Frauen planen in Etappen. Dtsch Arztebl. 2014;111(27–28):A-1246–C-1017.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission. Commission staff working document on an action plan for the EU health workforce. Strasbourg: EU; 2012. European Commission. Commission staff working document on an action plan for the EU health workforce. Strasbourg: EU; 2012.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Forschung BfBu. Bildungsoffensive für die digitale Wissensgesellschaft. 2016. Forschung BfBu. Bildungsoffensive für die digitale Wissensgesellschaft. 2016.
Metadaten
Titel
eSurgery—digital transformation in surgery, surgical education and training: survey analysis of the status quo in Germany
verfasst von
Juliane Kröplin
Tobias Huber
Christian Geis
Benedikt Braun
Tobias Fritz
Publikationsdatum
03.03.2022
Verlag
Springer Vienna
Erschienen in
European Surgery
Print ISSN: 1682-8631
Elektronische ISSN: 1682-4016
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10353-022-00747-x