nach oben

07.09.2023 | original article

Application value of an artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and recognition system in gastroscopy training for graduate students in gastroenterology: a preliminary study

verfasst von: Dr. Peng An, PhD, Prof. Zhongqiu Wang

Erschienen in: Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Summary

Objective

This study aimed to discuss the application value of an artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and recognition system (AIDRS) in the teaching activities for Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) in China. The learning performance of graduate students in gastroenterology during gastroscopy training with and without AIDRS was assessed.

Methods

The study recruited 32 graduate students of the gastroenterology program at Jiangsu province hospital of Chinese medicine and Xiangyang No. 1 People’s Hospital from March 2018 to March 2022 and randomly divided them into AIDRS (n = 16) and non-AIDRS (n = 16) groups. The AIDRS software was used for real-time monitoring of blind spots of gastroscopy to aid in lesion diagnosis and recognition in the AIDRS group. Only a conventional gastroscopic procedure was implemented in the non-AIDRS group. The final performance score, success rate of gastroscopy, lesion detection rate, and pain score of patients were compared between the two groups during gastroscopy. A self-prepared teaching and learning satisfaction questionnaire was administered to the two groups of students.

Results

The AIDRS group had a higher final performance score (92.60 ± 2.83 vs. 89.21 ± 3.57, t = 2.98, P < 0.05), a higher success rate of gastroscopy (448/480 vs. 417/480, χ² = 11.23, P < 0.05), and a higher detection rate of lesions (51/52 vs. 41/53, χ² = 8.56, P < 0.05) compared with the non-AIDRS group. The pain scores of patients were lower in the AIDRS group than in the non-AIDRS group (3.40 [2.23, 3.98] vs. 4.45 [3.72, 4.75], Z = 3.04, P < 0.05). Besides, the average time for gastroscopy was lower in the AIDRS group than in the non-AIDRS group (7.15 ± 1.24 vs. 8.21 ± 1.26, t = 2.38, P = 0.02). The overall satisfaction level with the teaching program was higher in the AIDRS group (43.51 ± 2.29 vs. 40.93 ± 2.07, t = 3.33, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In the context of medicine–education cooperation, AIDRS offered valuable assistance in gastroscopy training and increased the success rate of gastroscopy and teaching and learning satisfaction. AIDRS is worthy of wider-scale promotion.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Huddle TS, Heudebert GR. Internal medicine training in the 21st century. Acad Med. 2008;83(10):910–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181850a92.CrossRefPubMed

Thomas KG, West CP, Popkave C, Weinberger SE, Kolars JC. Internal medicine resident perceptions of optimal training duration. Acad Med. 2007;82(10):996–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814a5192.CrossRefPubMed

Ratelle JT, Halvorsen AJ, Mandrekar J, Sawatsky AP, Reed DA, Beckman TJ. Internal medicine resident professionalism assessments: exploring the association with patients’ overall satisfaction with their hospital stay. Acad Med. 2020;95(6):902–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003114.CrossRefPubMed

Lio J, Ye Y, Dong H, Reddy S, McConville J, Sherer R. Standardized residency training in China: the new internal medicine curriculum. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(1):50–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-017-0378-5.CrossRefPubMed

Sacks CA, Alba GA, Miloslavsky EM. The evolution of procedural competency in internal medicine training. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(12):1713–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.5014. published correction appears in JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):157.CrossRefPubMed

Yang YY, Shulruf B. Expert-led and artificial intelligence (AI) system-assisted tutoring course increase confidence of Chinese medical interns on suturing and ligature skills: prospective pilot study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:7. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Xue P, Qiao YL, Jiang Y. Application of artificial intelligence in diagnosis of medical endoscope. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2018;40(12):890–3. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2018.12.003.CrossRefPubMed

Kröner PT, Engels MM, Glicksberg BS, et al. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology: A state-of-the-art review. World J Gastroenterol. 2021;27(40):6794–824. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i40.6794.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ang TL, Carneiro G. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36(1):5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15344.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Min JK, Kwak MS, Cha JM. Overview of deep learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut Liver. 2019;13(4):388–93. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl18384.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Bang CS, Lee JJ, Baik GH. Artificial intelligence for the prediction of Helicobacter pylori infection in endoscopic images: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e21983. https://doi.org/10.2196/21983.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Wu L, He X, Liu M, et al. Evaluation of the effects of an artificial intelligence system on endoscopy quality and preliminary testing of its performance in detecting early gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2021;53(12):1199–207. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1350-5583.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Soffer S, Lahat A, Klang E. Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(12):984. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00349-6.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Repici A, Hassan C. Artificial intelligence for colonoscopy: the new Silk Road. Endoscopy. 2021;53(3):285–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1367-1979. published correction appears in Endoscopy. 2021 Mar;53(3):C6.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Moore M, Sharma P. Updates in artificial intelligence in gastroenterology endoscopy in 2020. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2021;37(5):428–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000000774.CrossRefPubMed

16.

An P, Zhang J, Li Y, et al. Clinical and imaging data-based model for predicting reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) in pregnant women with severe Preeclampsia or eclampsia and analysis of Perinatal outcomes. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:6990974. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6990974.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

An P, Zhang J, Yang F, Wang Z, Hu Y, Li X. USMRI features and clinical data-based model for predicting the degree of placenta accreta spectrum disorders and developing prediction models. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:9527412. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9527412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Kahn A, Leggett CL. Artificial intelligence in the age of cognitive endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(6):1251–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.009.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sharma P, Pante A, Gross SA. Artificial intelligence in endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(4):925–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.12.018.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Chahal D, Byrne MF. A primer on artificial intelligence and its application to endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(4):813–820.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.074.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Wu J, Chen J, Cai J. Application of artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2021;55(2):110–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001423.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Namikawa K, Hirasawa T, Yoshio T, et al. Utilizing artificial intelligence in endoscopy: a clinician’s guide. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;14(8):689–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2020.1779058.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Sumiyama K, Futakuchi T, Kamba S, Matsui H, Tamai N. Artificial intelligence in endoscopy: present and future perspectives. Dig Endosc. 2021;33(2):218–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13837.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Kim GH, Bang SJ, Hwang JH. Learning models for endoscopic ultrasonography in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(17):5176–82. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5176.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Han R, Yu W, Chen H, Chen Y. Using artificial intelligence reading label system in diabetic retinopathy grading training of junior ophthalmology residents and medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03272-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Application value of an artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and recognition system in gastroscopy training for graduate students in gastroenterology: a preliminary study
verfasst von: Dr. Peng An, PhD
Prof. Zhongqiu Wang
Publikationsdatum: 07.09.2023
Verlag: Springer Vienna
Erschienen in: Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
Print ISSN: 0043-5341
Elektronische ISSN: 1563-258X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354-023-01020-w