Case-control study of the treatment of postaxial polysyndactyly of the foot: Comparison of surgical results after removal of the fifth or sixth toe

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Background In postaxial polysyndactyly of the foot, the choice of which toe to excise is controversial. It is often treated by resection of the fifth toe to save the lateral neurovascular bundles of the sixth toe. However, the sixth toe is often short and laterally deviated, which may require wedge osteotomy, potentially shortening the phalanx and compromising circulation. This study outlines an individualized method to spare the length and axis of the fifth toe in polysyndactyly with a short and deviated sixth toe.

Methods We retrospectively analyzed 38 patients who underwent surgery between 2006 and 2019. The fifth toe was spared in 18 cases, and the sixth toe in 20 cases. The ratios of the forefoot width, angle difference, and toe length were compared between the affected and unaffected sides postoperatively. Complications and subjective judgments on cosmetic results were recorded and compared.

Results No significant between-group differences were observed for sex, age at surgery, or the follow-up period. The forefoot width ratio did not significantly differ between the groups. However, the angle difference and toe length ratios showed significantly better results in the fifth toe-spared group than in the sixth toe-spared group (P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively). There were no cases of impaired circulation, and subjective evaluations revealed satisfactory results in the fifth toe-spared group.

Conclusions In cases with short and deviated sixth toes, sparing the fifth toe is an effective method of cosmetic treatment. The surgical results were satisfactory, with an improved appearance and no residual deformities.

Publication History

Received: 19 August 2020

Accepted: 17 November 2020

Article published online:
20 March 2022

© 2021. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• REFERENCES

• 1 Usami S, Kodaira S, Okazaki M. Primary on-top plasty for treatment of short-type postaxial polydactyly of the foot. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77: 223-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Coppolelli BG, Ready JE, Awbrey BJ. et al. Polydactyly of the foot in adults: literature review and unusual case presentation with diagnostic and treatment recommendations. J Foot Surg 1991; 30: 12-8
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Watanabe H, Fujita S, Oka I. Polydactyly of the foot: an analysis of 265 cases and a morphological classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 89: 856-77
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kojima T, Honma M, Sakurai T. et al. Postoperative evaluation of the polysyndactyly and its reparative techniques. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 15: 336
  Google Scholar
• 5 Aoki T, Nakajima T, Onishi K. et al. A new operative procedure using Z-plasty to repair polysyndactyly of the foot. Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 34: 833-7
  Google Scholar
• 6 Seok HH, Park JU, Kwon ST. New classification of polydactyly of the foot on the basis of syndactylism, axis deviation, and metatarsal extent of extra digit. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40: 232-7
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Phelps DA, Grogan DP. Polydactyly of the foot. J Pediatr Orthop 1985; 5: 446-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Son WG, Gwon ST, Lee SW. Simple classification of foot polydactyly based on the status of metatarsal bone and varus deformity. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 31: 501-5
  Google Scholar
• 9 Miura T, Nakamura R, Imamura T. Polydactyly of the hands and feet. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12: 474-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kim JH, Kim BJ, Kwon ST. Foot syndactyly: a clinical and demographic analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2016; 43: 559-63
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 McClintic BS. Five generations of polydactylism. J Hered 1935; 26: 141-4
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 12 Albrecht AN, Kornak U, Boddrich A. et al. A molecular pathogenesis for transcription factor associated poly-alanine tract expansions. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13: 2351-9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Malik S, Grzeschik KH. Synpolydactyly: clinical and molecular advances. Clin Genet 2008; 73: 113-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kozin SH. Upper-extremity congenital anomalies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1564-76
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Nogami H. Polydactyly and polysyndactyly of the fifth toe. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 204: 261-5
  Google Scholar
• 16 Venn-Watson EA. Problems in polydactyly of the foot. Orthop Clin North Am 1976; 7: 909-27
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Iba K, Wada T, Kanaya K. et al. An individualized approach to surgical reconstruction for lateral polydactyly of the foot with an emphasis on collateral ligament reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 673e-680e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Sahin O, Kuru I, Akgun RC. et al. Metatarsal transfer for the treatment of post-axial metatarsal-type foot synpolydactyly: a new technique that allows for comfortable shoe wearing. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 929-34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Uda H, Sugawara Y, Niu A. et al. Treatment of lateral ray polydactyly of the foot: focusing on the selection of the toe to be excised. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 1581-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar