CC BY-NC 4.0 · Arch Plast Surg 2012; 39(04): 367-375
DOI: 10.5999/aps.2012.39.4.367
Original Article

Lower Extremity Reconstruction Using Vastus Lateralis Myocutaneous Flap versus Anterolateral Thigh Fasciocutaneous Flap

Min Jae Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
In Sik Yun
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Dong Kyun Rah
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
,
Won Jai Lee
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations

Background The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap has become a popular option for treating soft tissue defects of lower extremity reconstruction and can be combined with a segment of the vastus lateralis muscle. We present a comparison of the use of the ALT fasciocutaneous (ALT-FC) and myocutaneous flaps.

Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients in whom free-tissue transfer was performed between 2005 and 2011 for the reconstruction of lower extremity soft-tissue defects. Twenty-four patients were divided into two groups: reconstruction using an ALT-FC flap (12 cases) and reconstruction using a vastus lateralis myocutaneous (VL-MC) flap (12 cases). Postoperative complications, functional results, cosmetic results, and donor-site morbidities were studied.

Results Complete flap survival was 100% in both groups. A flap complication was noted in one case (marginal dehiscence) of the ALT-FC group, and no complications were noted in the VL-MC group. In both groups, one case of partial skin graft loss occurred at the donor site, and debulking surgeries were needed for two cases. There were no significant differences in the mean scores for either functional or cosmetic outcomes in either group.

Conclusions The VL-MC flap is able to fill occasional dead space and has comparable survival rates to ALT-FC with minimal donor-site morbidity. Additionally, the VL-MC flap is easily elevated without myocutaneous perforator injury.

This article was presented at the 29th Annual Meeting of the Korean Society for Microsurgery on November 3, 2010 in Seoul, Korea.




Publication History

Received: 12 April 2012

Accepted: 19 June 2012

Article published online:
01 May 2022

© 2012. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, permitting unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Coessens BC, Van Geertruyden JP, Vico PG. Free TRAM flap for lower-extremity reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 1994; 10: 305-311
  • 2 Kaplan I, Ada S, Ozerkan F. et al. Reconstruction of soft tissue and bone defects in lower extremity with free flaps. Microsurgery 1998; 18: 176-181
  • 3 Gonzalez MH, Tarandy DI, Troy D. et al. Free tissue coverage of chronic traumatic wounds of the lower leg. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 592-600
  • 4 Pu LL, Medalie DA, Lawrence SJ. et al. Reconstruction of through-and-through gunshot wounds to the feet with free gracilis muscle flaps. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 286-291
  • 5 Song YG, Chen GZ, Song YL. The free thigh flap: a new free flap concept based on the septocutaneous artery. Br J Plast Surg 1984; 37: 149-159
  • 6 Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N. et al. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2219-2226
  • 7 Kimura N, Satoh K, Hasumi T. et al. Clinical application of the free thin anterolateral thigh flap in 31 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1197-1208
  • 8 Rajacic N, Gang RK, Krishnan J. et al. Thin anterolateral thigh free flap. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 48: 252-257
  • 9 Reddy V, Stevenson TR. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1-7
  • 10 Ozkan O, Coskunfirat OK, Ozgentas HE. The use of free anterolateral thigh flap for reconstructing soft tissue defects of the lower extremities. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 455-461
  • 11 Kimata Y, Uchiyama K, Ebihara S. et al. Anatomic variations and technical problems of the anterolateral thigh flap: a report of 74 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1517-1523
  • 12 Choi SW, Park JY, Hur MS. et al. An anatomic assessment on perforators of the lateral circumflex femoral artery for anterolateral thigh flap. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18: 866-871
  • 13 Kuo YR, Jeng SF, Kuo MH. et al. Free anterolateral thigh flap for extremity reconstruction: clinical experience and functional assessment of donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1766-1771
  • 14 Tayfur V, Magden O, Edizer M. et al. Anatomy of vastus lateralis muscle flap. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21: 1951-1953
  • 15 Nelson JA, Serletti JM, Wu LC. The vastus lateralis muscle flap in head and neck reconstruction: an alternative flap for soft tissue defects. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64: 28-30
  • 16 Yildirim S, Gideroglu K, Akoz T. Anterolateral thigh flap: ideal free flap choice for lower extremity soft-tissue reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2003; 19: 225-233