Download PDF
Thromb Haemost 2006; 95(04): 744-746
DOI: 10.1160/TH05-07-0474
Letters to the Editor
Schattauer GmbH

Different cut-off values for two D-dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis in primary care

Ruud Oudega
1   Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Diane B. Toll
1   Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Ruben J. Bulten
1   Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Arno W. Hoes
1   Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
,
Karel G. M. Moons
1   Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 06 July 2005

Accepted after resubmission 10 February 2006

Publication Date:
30 November 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

 

 

  • References

  • 1 Anderson Jr. FA, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ. et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151: 933-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ginsberg JS. Management of Venous Thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 1816-29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hull R, Delmore T, Carter C. et al. Adjusted subcutaneous heparin versus warfarin sodium in the long-term treatment of venous thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 189-94.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oudega R, Moons KGM, Hoes AW. Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care. Fam Pract 2005; 22: 86-91.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gardiner C, Pennaneach C, Walford C. et al. An evaluation of rapid D-dimer assays for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis. Br J Haematol 2005; 128: 842-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Heim SW, Schechtman JM, Siadaty MS. et al. D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: A meta analysis. Clin Chem 2004; 50: 1136-47.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 van der Graaf F, van den Borne H, van der Kolk M. et al. Exclusion of deep venous thrombosis with D-dimer testing--comparison of 13 D-dimer methods in 99 outpatients suspected of deep venous thrombosis using venography as reference standard. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83: 191-8.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schutgens RE, Haas FJ, Gerritsen WB. et al. The usefulness of five D-dimer assays in the exclusion of deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 01: 976-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 de Monyé W, Sanson BJ, Büller HR. et al. The performance of two rapid quantitative D-dimer assays in 287 patients with clinically susoected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res 2002; 107: 283-6.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KGM. Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care: a simple dignostic algorithm including D-dimer testing. Thromb Haemost 2005; 94: 200-5.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron MJ. et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients. Lancet 1999; 353: 190-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schutgens RE, Ackermark P, Haas FJ. et al. Combination ofa normal D-dimer concentration and a nonhigh pretest clinical probability score is a safe strategy to exclude deep venous thrombosis. Circulation 2003; 107: 593-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC. et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140: 589-602.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Sackett DL. Users’ guides to the medical literature. III. How to use an article about a diagnostic test. B. What are the results and will they help me in caring for my patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1994; 271: 703-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar