Real-Time Detection of Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Atrophic Gastritis: Comparison between Conventional Methods and a Novel Device for Gastric Juice Analysis During Endoscopy

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Gastric juice may represent a valuable source of clinicopathological information if properly analyzed. We evaluated the reliability and clinical validity of data obtained using an innovative device (the “Mt 21 - 42”) that analyzes gastric juice, thus allowing the identification of Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis of the oxyntic mucosa during endoscopy.
Methods: Validation studies were carried out to evaluate the measuring performance of the device. In addition, the H. pylori status and the presence of atrophic gastritis were assessed in 150 patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In all these patients the Mt 21 - 42 device was used to assist endoscopy. Conventional tests (involving histology, urease testing, urea breath testing, anti-H. pylori IgG, serum gastrin, pepsinogen, intrinsic factor and parietal cells autoantibodies, vitamin B₁₂, and folate) were also performed for comparison with the Mt 21 - 42 results.
Results: The measuring performance of the Mt 21 - 42 was good; for pH, the relative percent error and the coefficient of variation were 1.9 % ± 4.2 and 1.3 %, respectively, and for ammonium they were 0.1 % ± 0.2 % and 2.1 %. For the detection of H. pylori infection, the sensitivity and specificity of the device (96.7 % and 94.3 %) were similar to those of the urea breath test (90.5 % and 93.3 %) and serology (87.1 % and 88.8 %), and higher than those of the urease test (78.6 % and 98.7 %; P < 0.01) and routine histology (94.3 % and 76.3 %; P < 0.05). When compared with the currently available standard methods, use of the Mt 21 - 42 was found to be the most sensitive technique for the detection of atrophy (94.7 % vs. 5.3 % - 47.4 %; P < 0.001); the device failed to detect the disease in only one case (5 %), whereas failure rates of 53 % - 95 % were reported with the conventional methods.
Conclusion: Atrophic gastritis of the oxyntic mucosa is a risky condition that often goes undetected in current clinical practice. The Mt 21 - 42 is an effective, useful, and desirable tool that may help to overcome this diagnostic limitation; it produces time and cost savings and also allows the detection of H. pylori infection.

References

• 1 Belair P A, Metz D C, Faigel D O, Furth E E. Receiver operator characteristic analysis of endoscopy as a test for gastritis.  Dig Dis Sci. 1997;  42 2227-2233
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Tucci A, Poli L, Biasco G. et al . Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric function in patients with fundic atrophic gastritis.  Dig Dis Sci. 2001;  46 1573-1583
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Toth E, Sjolund K, Fork F T, Lindstrom C. Chronic atrophic fundic gastritis diagnosed by a modified Congo red test.  Endoscopy. 1995;  27 654-658
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kokkola A, Rautelin H, Puolakkainen P. et al . Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with atrophic gastritis: comparison of histology, 13C-urea breath test, and serology.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;  35 138-141
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Samloff M, Varis K, Ihamaki T. et al . Relationship among serum pepsinogen I, serum pepsinogen II, and gastric mucosal histology.  Gastroenterology. 1982;  83 204-209
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Annibale B, Marignani M, Azzoni C. et al . Atrophic body gastritis: distinct features associated with Helicobacter pylori infection.  Helicobacter. 1997;  2 57-64
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S. et al . Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer.  N Engl J Med.. 2001;  345 829-832
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Marshall B J, Langton S R. Urea hydrolysis in patients with Campylobacter pylori infection.  Lancet. 1986;  i 965-966
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kim H, Park C, Jang W I. et al . The gastric juice urea and ammonia levels in patients with Campylobacter pylori.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1990;  94 187-191
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Neithercut W D, Milne A, Chittajallu R S. et al . Detection of Helicobacter pylori infection of the gastric mucosa by measurement of gastric aspirate ammonium and urea concentrations.  Gut. 1991;  32 973-976
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 El Nujumi A M, Rowe P A, Dahill S. et al . Role of ammonia in the pathogenesis of the gastritis, hypergastrinemia, and hyperpepsinogenaemia I caused by Helicobacter pylori infection.  Gut. 1992;  33 1612-1616
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Neithercut W D, El Nujumi A M, McColl K EL. Measurement of urea and ammonium concentrations in gastric juice.  J Clin Pathol. 1993;  46 462-464
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Yang D H, Bom H S, Joo Y E. et al . Gastric juice ammonia vs. CLO test for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.  Dig Dis Sci. 1995;  40 1083-1086
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Mokuolu A O, Sigal S H, Lieber C S. Gastric juice urease activity as a diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori infection.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;  92 644-648
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Verdù E F, Armstrong D, Sabovcikova L. et al . High concentrations of ammonia, but not volatile amines, in gastric juice of subjects with Helicobacter pylori infection.  Helicobacter. 1998;  3 97-102
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Kearney D J, Ritchie K, Peacock J S. Gastric-juice ammonia assay for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and relationship of ammonia concentration to gastritis severity.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 3399-3403
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Demirturk L, Yazgan Y, Izci O. et al . The effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastric juice and blood ammonia concentrations and on visual evoked potentials in cirrhotics.  Helicobacter. 2001;  6 325-330
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Chakrabarti P, Zullo A, Hassan C. et al . Helicobacter pylori, gastric juice, and arterial ammonia levels in patients with cirrhosis.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;  34 578-581
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Love M D, Pardue H L, Pagan G. Evaluation of transient responses of ammonia-selective potentiometric electrodes for quantitative applications.  Anal Chem. 1992;  64 1269-1276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Viswanathan T S, Nagarajan M, Haribabu B. Determination of ammoniacal nitrogen in the presence of urea.  J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1980;  63 1248-1253
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Helfgott T, Mazurek J S. Aquatic nitrogen determinations in real-time.  Prog Water Technol. 1977;  8 433-446
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Eagan M L, DuBois L. The determination of ammonium ion in airborne particulates with selective electrodes.  Anal Chim Acta. 1974;  70 157
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Jaskiewicz K, Van Helden P D, Wiid I J. et al . Chronic atrophic gastritis, gastric pH, nitrites and micronutrient levels in a population at risk for gastric carcinoma.  Anticancer Res. 1990;  10 833-836
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Andersen J, Strom M. A technique for screening of achlorhydria and hypochlorhydria during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1990;  25 1084-1088
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Feldman M, Barnett C. Fasting gastric pH and its relationship to true hypochlorhydria in humans.  Dig Dis Sci. 1991;  36 866-869
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Segawa K, Nakazawa S, Tsukamoto Y. et al . Estimate of gastric acid output by evaluation of fasting gastric juice collected endoscopically.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1991;  38 (Suppl 1) 79-82
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Huseby E, Skar V, Hoverstad T, Melby K. Fasting hypochlorhydria with Gram positive gastric flora is highly prevalent in healthy old people.  Gut. 1992;  33 1331-1337
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Fisher R S, Sher D J, Donahue D. et al . A single intragastric pH electrode does not accurately measure intragastric acidity.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;  91 1167-1172
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Hurwitz A, Brady D A, Schaal S E. et al . Gastric acidity in older adults.  JAMA. 1997;  278 659-662
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Angerer M, Koelzow H, Londong W. Simultaneous comparison of 24-hour intragastric pH recording using glass and antimony electrodes in man.  Dig Dis. 1990;  8 38-45
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Emde C. Electrochemical aspects of pH electrodes.  Dig Dis. 1990;  8 18-22
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Savarino V, Mela G S. Comparison of gastric aspiration and continuous pH monitoring with antimony electrode: methodological remarks.  Dig Dis. 1990;  8 23-30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Chiverton S G, Salena B J, Burget D W, Hunt R H. Do hourly averaged pH readings correlate with those from point readings of aspiration?.  Dig Dis. 1990;  8 31-37
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 US Environmental Protection Agency .Ammonia-N in water and biosolids by ion-selective electrode potentiometry with preliminary distillation. Method 1689. EPA-821-R-01-012. Washington, DC; US Environmental Protection Agency
  Google Scholar
• 35 Dixon M F, Genta R M, Yardley J H. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;  20 1161-1181
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Ley C, Mohar A, Guarner J. et al . Screening markers for chronic atrophic gastritis in Chiapas, Mexico.  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001;  10 107-112
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Vaananen H, Vauhkonen M, Helske T. et al . Non-endoscopic diagnosis of atrophic gastritis with a blood test. Correlation between gastric histology and serum levels of gastrin-17 and pepsinogen I: a multicentre study.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 885-891
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Lindgren A, Lindgren A, Lindstedt G. Advantages of serum pepsinogen A combined with gastrin or pepsinogen C as first-line analytes in the evaluation of suspected cobalamin deficiency: a study in patients previously not subjected to gastrointestinal surgery.  J Int Med. 1998;  244 341-349
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Sanduleanu S, Bruine A D, Biemond I. et al . Ratio between serum IL-8 and pepsinogen A/C: a marker for atrophic body gastritis.  Eur J Clin Invest. 2003;  33 147-154
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon M F. et al . Gastric mucosal atrophy: interobserver consistency using new criteria for classification and grading.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;  16 1249-1259
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Offerhaus G J, Price A B, Haot J. et al . Observer agreement on the grading of gastric atrophy.  Histopathology. 1999;  34 320-325
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

A. Tucci, M. D.

S.P Lesina-Ripalta, km 0,5 · 71010 Lesina (FG) · Italy

Fax: +39-882-990877 ·

Email: tucciant@tin.it