Assessing the Adequacy of Endoscopically Tied Knots: A Functional Approach

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background and Study Aims: Endoscopic intracorporeal knots have potentially enormous applications in endoscopic surgery. We describe a method for testing the security of various types of endoscopically tied knots using a vessel perfusion manometer system.
Methods: A 4-cm segment of porcine splenic artery was placed on the mucosal surface of a pig stomach. The two ends of the vessel were brought out through the gastric wall and connected to a two-way manometer. One end was also joined to a pressure infusion bag. The stomach was mounted in an Erlangen training model. A long 3/0 nylon thread, previously introduced into the submucosal layer of the stomach and encircling the vessel, was brought out from the mouth. Three-throw square knots, Mayo knots, “surgeon’s” knots and five-throw square knots were tied and pushed into place using a cap attached to a gastroscope. The pressure at the two ends of the artery was compared. If the pressure could be increased to over 200 mm Hg at one end without a change in the other, the knot was considered secure.
Results: Each type of knot was tested 12 times under endoscopic vision. The range for mean knotting time was 3.4 - 4.5 minutes. Five-throw knots took significantly longer to tie than three-throw knots (P < 0.005). There was one loose knot in each of the three-throw and Mayo groups, and three each in the “surgeon’s” and five-throw groups (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: This system is a reliable model for testing intracorporeal knots tied endoscopically. A three-half-hitches square knot with 3/0 nylon, tied using a flexible endoscope and knot-tightening cap, can withstand pressure up to 200 mm Hg.

References

• 1 Swain C P, Kadirkamanathan S S, Gong F. et al . Knot tying at flexible endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 722-729
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Swain C P, Evans D F, Glynn M. et al . Endoscopic sewing machine used to achieve continuous noninvasive monitoring of gastric pH for three months in man [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 278
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Swain C P. Endoscopic suturing.  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;  13 97-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Neumann M, Hochberger J, Felzmann T. et al . The Erlanger endo-trainer.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 887-890
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Schaffer S R. The surgeon’s knot tied with one hand.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;  159 171-172
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Khatri V P, Cunningham P. A different technique of tying the surgeon’s knot.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;  175 464-465
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Shaw A D, Duthie G S. A simple assessment of surgical sutures and knots.  J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1995;  40 388-391
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Dorsey J H, Sharp H T, Chovan J D. et al . Laparoscopic knot strength: a comparison with conventional knots.  Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  86 536-540
  Google Scholar
• 9 Brown R P. Knotting technique and suture materials.  Br J Surg. 1992;  79 399-400
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Hanna G B, Frank T G, Cuschieri A. Objective assessment of endoscopic knot quality.  Am J Surg. 1997;  174 410-413
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Emam T A, Hanna G B, Kimber C. et al . Differences between experts and trainees in the motion pattern of the dominant upper limb during intracorporeal endoscopic knotting.  Dig Surg. 2000;  17 120-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Emam T A, Hanna G B, Kimber C. et al . Effect of intracorporeal-extracorporeal instrument length ratio on endoscopic task performance and surgeon movements.  Arch Surg. 2000;  135 62-65
  PubMedGoogle Scholar

S. C. S. Chung, M. D.

Endoscopy Center, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong ·

Shatin N.T. · Hong Kong SAR · China

Fax: +852-2635-0075

Email: sydneychung@cuhk.edu.hk