Colon cleansing protocol in children: research conditions vs. clinical practice

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Colon preparation rates are the limiting factor for a successful diagnostic colonoscopy in children. Different colon cleansing protocols have been published for use in children. Unfortunately, the applicability of those published research protocols has not been formally evaluated in routine clinical practice. We investigated the success rate of our previously published colon cleansing protocol as utilized in our clinical practice.

Patients and methods This was a retrospective study. In the clinical practice, the colon cleansing protocol included PEG-3350 at a dose of 2 g/kg/day plus Dulcolax (Bisacodyl, Boehringer Ingelheim, TX USA) 5 mg/day for 2 days. Adequate colon preparation was graded between 1 – 5, as previously described, and grade ≥ 4.0 was considered an adequate preparation. Patients were instructed to complete a questionnaire that included PEG-3350 dose, number of stools per day, consistency of each stool, and side effects (vomiting, abdominal pain). Clinical and endoscopic results were compared between the protocol under research conditions and routine practice.

Results The success rate of the colon preparation in our clinical practice was similar to the results observed under our research protocol (75 % vs. 73.6 %). Moreover, the total number of stools, stool consistency, and the intubation rate of the terminal ileum were also similar. We concluded, that in our experience, the colon cleansing protocol used under research conditions was effective and appropriate for use in routine clinical practice.

Conclusion We recommend testing each new protocol under the routine conditions of clinical practice to confirm its applicability for general practitioners.

• References

• 1 Safder S, Demintieva Y, Rewalt M. et al. Stool consistency and stool frequency are excellent clinical markers for adequate colon preparation after polyethylene glycol 3350 cleansing protocol: a prospective clinical study in children. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1131-1135
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Di Nardo G, Aloi M, Cucchiara S. et al. Bowel preparations for colonoscopy: an RCT. Pediatrics 2014; 134: 249-256
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Abbas MI, Nylund CM, Bruch CJ. et al. Prospective evaluation of 1 day polyethylene glycol 3350 bowel preparation regimen in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2013; 56: 220-224
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Pashankar DS, Uc A, Bishop WP. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, effective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. Pediatrics 2004; 144: 358-362
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Phatak UP, Johnson S, Husain SZ. et al. Two-day bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol 3350 and bisacodyl: a new, safe, and effective regimen for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2011; 53: 71-74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Pall H, Zacur GM, Kramer RE. et al. Bowel preparation for pediatric colonoscopy: Report of the NASPGHAN endoscopy and procedures committee. J Pediatric Gastroenterol Nutr 2014; 59: 409-416
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Gremse DA, Sacks AI, Raines S. Comparison of oral sodium phosphate to polyethylene glycol-based solution for bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1996; 23: 586-590
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Barrish JO, Gilger MA. Colon cleanout preparations in children and adolescents. Gastroenterol Nurs 1993; 16: 106-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Dahshan A, Lin CH, Peters J. et al. A randomized, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy in children. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 3497-3501
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 da Silva MM, Briars GL, Patrick MK. et al. Colonoscopy preparation in children: safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high- versus low-volume cleansing methods. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1997; 24: 33-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Elitsur R, Butcher L, Lund V. et al. Colon preparation in children: head to head comparison between 2 and 4 days PEG 3350 protocols. World J Gastrointestinal Endosc 2013; 5: 165-168
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Vanner SJ, MacDonald PH, Paterson WG. et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with standard polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution (Golytely) in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 422-427
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Barclay RL, Depew WT, Vanner SJ. Carbohydrate-electrolyte rehydration protects against intravascular volume contraction during colonic cleansing with orally administered sodium phosphate. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 633-638
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Radaelli F, Meucci G, Sgroi G. et al. Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 1122-1130
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Ibáñez M, Parra-Blanco A, Zaballa P. et al. Usefulness of an intensive bowel cleansing strategy for repeat colonoscopy after preparation failure. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 1578-1584
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Kesteloot K, Veereman-Wauters G, Nolis I. et al. A model for calculating the hospital costs of pediatric endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996; 44: 548-553
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar