What is Normal Ovarian Reserve?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

While hormonal and ultrasonographic measures of ovarian reserve are often used to counsel patients about their fertility potential, normative data for these markers in the general population are lacking. Most studies are cross sectional and take place within specific subpopulations. Antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone have been shown to be the best indicators of a woman's total follicular reserve. Ovarian volume, inhibin B, estradiol, and follicle-stimulating hormone are less helpful. Antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone decrease with age and have been used to attempt to predict the length of the fertile window. Additional longitudinal data are needed for these biomarkers in populations of young, healthy, multiethnic women to assess for the presence of cofactors and determine the rate of age-related decline. Currently, these biomarkers are insufficient as predictors of fertility potential or advancement to menopause and no definitive determinations can be made about what constitutes “normal” levels of each measure.

• References

• 1 Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod 1992; 7 (10) 1342-1346
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Wallace WH, Kelsey TW. Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLoS ONE 2010; 5 (1) e8772
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Faddy MJ, Gosden RG. A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum Reprod 1996; 11 (7) 1484-1486
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hansen KR, Knowlton NS, Thyer AC, Charleston JS, Soules MR, Klein NA. A new model of reproductive aging: the decline in ovarian non-growing follicle number from birth to menopause. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (3) 699-708
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Kelsey TW, Anderson RA, Wright P, Nelson SM, Wallace WH. Data-driven assessment of the human ovarian reserve. Mol Hum Reprod 2012; 18 (2) 79-87
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Hehenkamp WJ, Looman CW, Themmen AP, de Jong FH, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in the spontaneous menstrual cycle do not show substantial fluctuation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91 (10) 4057-4063
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Deb S, Campbell BK, Clewes JS, Pincott-Allen C, Raine-Fenning NJ. Intracycle variation in number of antral follicles stratified by size and in endocrine markers of ovarian reserve in women with normal ovulatory menstrual cycles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41 (2) 216-222
  Google Scholar
• 8 Pache TD, Wladimiroff JW, de Jong FH, Hop WC, Fauser BC. Growth patterns of nondominant ovarian follicles during the normal menstrual cycle. Fertil Steril 1990; 54 (4) 638-642
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Hansen KR, Hodnett GM, Knowlton N, Craig LB. Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (1) 170-175
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Bancsi LF, Te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ. Antral follicle count in the prediction of poor ovarian response and pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis and comparison with basal follicle-stimulating hormone level. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (2) 291-301
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Gougeon A, Ecochard R, Thalabard JC. Age-related changes of the population of human ovarian follicles: increase in the disappearance rate of non-growing and early-growing follicles in aging women. Biol Reprod 1994; 50 (3) 653-663
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Richardson SJ, Senikas V, Nelson JF. Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987; 65 (6) 1231-1237
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Rosen MP, Sternfeld B, Schuh-Huerta SM, Reijo Pera RA, McCulloch CE, Cedars MI. Antral follicle count: absence of significant midlife decline. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (6) 2182-2185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Looman CW , et al. The number of antral follicles in normal women with proven fertility is the best reflection of reproductive age. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (4) 700-706
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 La Marca A, Spada E, Sighinolfi G , et al. Age-specific nomogram for the decline in antral follicle count throughout the reproductive period. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 684-688
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rosen MP, Johnstone E, McCulloch CE , et al. A characterization of the relationship of ovarian reserve markers with age. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (1) 238-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Almog B, Shehata F, Shalom-Paz E, Tan SL, Tulandi T. Age-related normogram for antral follicle count: McGill reference guide. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 663-666
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Rosen MP, Johnstone E, Addauan-Andersen C, Cedars MI. A lower antral follicle count is associated with infertility. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (6) 1950-1954 , e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Dorland M, Habbema JD, Looman CW, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. Fertil Steril 1999; 72 (5) 845-851
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Broekmans FJ, Faddy MJ, Scheffer G, te Velde ER. Antral follicle counts are related to age at natural fertility loss and age at menopause. Menopause 2004; 11 (6 Pt 1) 607-614
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Wellons MF, Bates GW, Schreiner PJ, Siscovick DS, Sternfeld B, Lewis CE. Antral follicle count predicts natural menopause in a population-based sample: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Women's Study. Menopause 2013; 20 (8) 825-830
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Jayaprakasan K, Deb S, Batcha M , et al. The cohort of antral follicles measuring 2-6 mm reflects the quantitative status of ovarian reserve as assessed by serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone and response to controlled ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (5) 1775-1781
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Bentzen JG, Forman JL, Johannsen TH, Pinborg A, Larsen EC, Andersen AN. Ovarian antral follicle subclasses and anti-mullerian hormone during normal reproductive aging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98 (4) 1602-1611
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Gracia CR, Sammel MD, Freeman E , et al. Impact of cancer therapies on ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (1) 134-140 , e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Lie Fong S, Laven JS, Hakvoort-Cammel FG , et al. Assessment of ovarian reserve in adult childhood cancer survivors using anti-Müllerian hormone. Hum Reprod 2009; 24 (4) 982-990
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Das M, Shehata F, Son WY, Tulandi T, Holzer H. Ovarian reserve and response to IVF and in vitro maturation treatment following chemotherapy. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (8) 2509-2514
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Anderson RA, Cameron DA. Pretreatment serum anti-müllerian hormone predicts long-term ovarian function and bone mass after chemotherapy for early breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (5) 1336-1343
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Tinkanen H, Bläuer M, Laippala P, Tuohimaa P, Kujansuu E. Prognostic factors in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 1999; 72 (5) 932-936
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Barnhart K, Osheroff J. Follicle stimulating hormone as a predictor of fertility. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 10 (3) 227-232
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 McIlveen M, Skull JD, Ledger WL. Evaluation of the utility of multiple endocrine and ultrasound measures of ovarian reserve in the prediction of cycle cancellation in a high-risk IVF population. Hum Reprod 2007; 22 (3) 778-785
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Elter K, Sismanoglu A, Durmusoglu F. Intercycle variabilities of basal antral follicle count and ovarian volume in subfertile women and their relationship to reproductive aging: a prospective study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2005; 20 (3) 137-143
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Flaws JA, Langenberg P, Babus JK, Hirshfield AN, Sharara FI. Ovarian volume and antral follicle counts as indicators of menopausal status. Menopause 2001; 8 (3) 175-180
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Pavlik EJ, DePriest PD, Gallion HH , et al. Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 77 (3) 410-412
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Eijkemans MJ, de Jong FH, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (2) 328-336
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (6) 1407-1415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Hendriks DJ, Kwee J, Mol BW, te Velde ER, Broekmans FJ. Ultrasonography as a tool for the prediction of outcome in IVF patients: a comparative meta-analysis of ovarian volume and antral follicle count. Fertil Steril 2007; 87 (4) 764-775
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston RM. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophin for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (2) 294-297
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Järvelä IY, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Quantification of ovarian power Doppler signal with three-dimensional ultrasonography to predict response during in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102 (4) 816-822
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Cook CL, Siow Y, Taylor S, Fallat ME. Serum müllerian-inhibiting substance levels during normal menstrual cycles. Fertil Steril 2000; 73 (4) 859-861
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 van Rooij IA, Broekmans FJ, Scheffer GJ , et al. Serum antimullerian hormone levels best reflect the reproductive decline with age in normal women with proven fertility: a longitudinal study. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (4) 979-987
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Fanchin R, Schonäuer LM, Righini C, Guibourdenche J, Frydman R, Taieb J. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone is more strongly related to ovarian follicular status than serum inhibin B, estradiol, FSH and LH on day 3. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (2) 323-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Kelsey TW, Wright P, Nelson SM, Anderson RA, Wallace WH. A validated model of serum anti-müllerian hormone from conception to menopause. PLoS ONE 2011; 6 (7) e22024
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Lie Fong S, Visser JA, Welt CK , et al. Serum anti-müllerian hormone levels in healthy females: a nomogram ranging from infancy to adulthood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97 (12) 4650-4655
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 La Marca A, Sighinolfi G, Giulini S , et al. Normal serum concentrations of anti-Müllerian hormone in women with regular menstrual cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21 (4) 463-469
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 La Marca A, Spada E, Grisendi V , et al. Normal serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in the general female population and the relationship with reproductive history. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 163 (2) 180-184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Sowers MR, Eyvazzadeh AD, McConnell D , et al. Anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B in the definition of ovarian aging and the menopause transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93 (9) 3478-3483
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 van Disseldorp J, Faddy MJ, Themmen AP , et al. Relationship of serum antimüllerian hormone concentration to age at menopause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93 (6) 2129-2134
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Broer SL, Eijkemans MJ, Scheffer GJ , et al. Anti-mullerian hormone predicts menopause: a long-term follow-up study in normoovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (8) 2532-2539
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Tehrani FR, Shakeri N, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Azizi F. Predicting age at menopause from serum antimüllerian hormone concentration. Menopause 2011; 18 (7) 766-770
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR. Anti-mullerian hormone as a predictor of time to menopause in late reproductive age women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97 (5) 1673-1680
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Boorman DW, Gracia CR. Contribution of the rate of change of antimüllerian hormone in estimating time to menopause for late reproductive-age women. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (5) 1254-1259 , e1–e2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Nelson SM, Messow MC, Wallace AM, Fleming R, McConnachie A. Nomogram for the decline in serum antimüllerian hormone: a population study of 9,601 infertility patients. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 736-741 , e1–e3
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Nelson SM, Messow MC, McConnachie A , et al. External validation of nomogram for the decline in serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women: a population study of 15,834 infertility patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2011; 23 (2) 204-206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Almog B, Shehata F, Suissa S , et al. Age-related normograms of serum antimüllerian hormone levels in a population of infertile women: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (7) 2359-2363 , e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Shebl O, Ebner T, Sir A , et al. Age-related distribution of basal serum AMH level in women of reproductive age and a presumably healthy cohort. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 832-834
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Seifer DB, Baker VL, Leader B. Age-specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone values for 17,120 women presenting to fertility centers within the United States. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (2) 747-750
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Moser M, Shebl O, Schreier-Lechner E, Tews G. Basal level of anti-Müllerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 2006; 21 (8) 2022-2026
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Fiçicioglu C, Kutlu T, Baglam E, Bakacak Z. Early follicular antimüllerian hormone as an indicator of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2006; 85 (3) 592-596
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Gnoth C, Schuring AN, Friol K, Tigges J, Mallmann P, Godehardt E. Relevance of anti-Mullerian hormone measurement in a routine IVF program. Hum Reprod 2008; 23 (6) 1359-1365
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Peñarrubia J, Fábregues F, Manau D , et al. Basal and stimulation day 5 anti-Mullerian hormone serum concentrations as predictors of ovarian response and pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology cycles stimulated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist—gonadotropin treatment. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (4) 915-922
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Eldar-Geva T, Ben-Chetrit A, Spitz IM , et al. Dynamic assays of inhibin B, anti-Mullerian hormone and estradiol following FSH stimulation and ovarian ultrasonography as predictors of IVF outcome. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (11) 3178-3183
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Elgindy EA, El-Haieg DO, El-Sebaey A. Anti-Müllerian hormone: correlation of early follicular, ovulatory and midluteal levels with ovarian response and cycle outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection patients. Fertil Steril 2008; 89 (6) 1670-1676
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Steiner AZ, Herring AH, Kesner JS , et al. Antimüllerian hormone as a predictor of natural fecundability in women aged 30-42 years. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (4) 798-804
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Dillon KE, Sammel MD, Prewitt M , et al. Pretreatment antimüllerian hormone levels determine rate of posttherapy ovarian reserve recovery: acute changes in ovarian reserve during and after chemotherapy. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (2) 477-483
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Freeman EW, Gracia CR, Sammel MD, Lin H, Lim LC, Strauss III JF. Association of anti-mullerian hormone levels with obesity in late reproductive-age women. Fertil Steril 2007; 87 (1) 101-106
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Su HI, Sammel MD, Freeman EW, Lin H, DeBlasis T, Gracia CR. Body size affects measures of ovarian reserve in late reproductive age women. Menopause 2008; 15 (5) 857-861
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Seifer DB, Golub ET, Lambert-Messerlian G , et al. Variations in serum müllerian inhibiting substance between white, black, and Hispanic women. Fertil Steril 2009; 92 (5) 1674-1678
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Streuli I, Fraisse T, Pillet C, Ibecheole V, Bischof P, de Ziegler D. Serum antimüllerian hormone levels remain stable throughout the menstrual cycle and after oral or vaginal administration of synthetic sex steroids. Fertil Steril 2008; 90 (2) 395-400
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Somunkiran A, Yavuz T, Yucel O, Ozdemir I. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels during hormonal contraception in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 134 (2) 196-201
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Li HW, Wong CY, Yeung WS, Ho PC, Ng EH. Serum anti-müllerian hormone level is not altered in women using hormonal contraceptives. Contraception 2011; 83 (6) 582-585
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Kallio S, Puurunen J, Ruokonen A, Vaskivuo T, Piltonen T, Tapanainen JS. Antimullerian hormone levels decrease in women using combined contraception independently of administration route. Fertil Steril 2013; 99 (5) 1305-1310
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Kristensen SL, Ramlau-Hansen CH, Andersen CY , et al. The association between circulating levels of antimüllerian hormone and follicle number, androgens, and menstrual cycle characteristics in young women. Fertil Steril 2012; 97 (3) 779-785
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Dólleman M, Verschuren WM, Eijkemans MJ , et al. Reproductive and lifestyle determinants of anti-Müllerian hormone in a large population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98 (5) 2106-2115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Tran ND, Cedars MI, Rosen MP. The role of anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) in assessing ovarian reserve. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (12) 3609-3614
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Randolph Jr JF, Zheng H, Sowers MR , et al. Change in follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol across the menopausal transition: effect of age at the final menstrual period. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (3) 746-754
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Sowers MR, Zheng H, McConnell D, Nan B, Harlow S, Randolph Jr JF. Follicle stimulating hormone and its rate of change in defining menopause transition stages. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93 (10) 3958-3964
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Burger HG, Dudley EC, Hopper JL , et al. Prospectively measured levels of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, estradiol, and the dimeric inhibins during the menopausal transition in a population-based cohort of women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84 (11) 4025-4030
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Tepper PG, Randolph Jr JF, McConnell DS , et al. Trajectory clustering of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone during the menopausal transition among women in the Study of Women's Health across the Nation (SWAN). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97 (8) 2872-2880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Soules MR, Sherman S, Parrott E , et al. Stages of reproductive aging workshop (STRAW). J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2001; 10 (9) 843-848
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Bancsi LF, Broekmans FJ, Mol BW, Habbema JD, te Velde ER. Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2003; 79 (5) 1091-1100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Scott Jr RT, Elkind-Hirsch KE, Styne-Gross A, Miller KA, Frattarelli JL. The predictive value for in vitro fertility delivery rates is greatly impacted by the method used to select the threshold between normal and elevated basal follicle-stimulating hormone. Fertil Steril 2008; 89 (4) 868-878
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ , et al. Predictive value and clinical impact of Basal follicle-stimulating hormone in subfertile, ovulatory women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92 (6) 2163-2168
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Roberts JE, Spandorfer S, Fasouliotis SJ, Kashyap S, Rosenwaks Z. Taking a basal follicle-stimulating hormone history is essential before initiating in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (1) 37-41
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Steiner AZ, Long DL, Herring AH, Kesner JS, Meadows JW, Baird DD. Urinary follicle-stimulating hormone as a measure of natural fertility in a community cohort. Reprod Sci 2013; 20 (5) 549-556
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 van Montfrans JM, van Hooff MH, Huirne JA , et al. Basal FSH concentrations as a marker of ovarian ageing are not related to pregnancy outcome in a general population of women over 30 years. Hum Reprod 2004; 19 (2) 430-434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Fanchin R, Taieb J, Lozano DH, Ducot B, Frydman R, Bouyer J. High reproducibility of serum anti-Mullerian hormone measurements suggests a multi-staged follicular secretion and strengthens its role in the assessment of ovarian follicular status. Hum Reprod 2005; 20 (4) 923-927
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Sowers MR, Zheng H, McConnell D, Nan B, Harlow SD, Randolph Jr JF. Estradiol rates of change in relation to the final menstrual period in a population-based cohort of women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93 (10) 3847-3852
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 Weiss G, Skurnick JH, Goldsmith LT, Santoro NF, Park SJ. Menopause and hypothalamic-pituitary sensitivity to estrogen. JAMA 2004; 292 (24) 2991-2996
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Santoro N, Crawford SL, Lasley WL , et al. Factors related to declining luteal function in women during the menopausal transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008; 93 (5) 1711-1721
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Freeman EW, Sammel MD, Lin H, Gracia CR. Obesity and reproductive hormone levels in the transition to menopause. Menopause 2010; 17 (4) 718-726
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Evers JL, Slaats P, Land JA, Dumoulin JC, Dunselman GA. Elevated levels of basal estradiol-17beta predict poor response in patients with normal basal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1998; 69 (6) 1010-1014
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Sowers M, McConnell D, Gast K , et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B variability during normal menstrual cycles. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (4) 1482-1486
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Danforth DR, Arbogast LK, Mroueh J , et al. Dimeric inhibin: a direct marker of ovarian aging. Fertil Steril 1998; 70 (1) 119-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Seifer DB, Lambert-Messerlian G, Hogan JW, Gardiner AC, Blazar AS, Berk CA. Day 3 serum inhibin-B is predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril 1997; 67 (1) 110-114
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P. Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology?. BJOG 2005; 112 (10) 1384-1390
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Seifer DB, MacLaughlin DT, Christian BP, Feng B, Shelden RM. Early follicular serum müllerian-inhibiting substance levels are associated with ovarian response during assisted reproductive technology cycles. Fertil Steril 2002; 77 (3) 468-471
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 97 Hall JE, Welt CK, Cramer DW. Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome. Hum Reprod 1999; 14 (2) 409-415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 98 Creus M, Peñarrubia J, Fábregues F , et al. Day 3 serum inhibin B and FSH and age as predictors of assisted reproduction treatment outcome. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (11) 2341-2346
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 99 McDade TW, Woodruff TK, Huang YY , et al. Quantification of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in dried blood spots: validation of a minimally invasive method for assessing ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 2012; 27 (8) 2503-2508
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 100 Liu JH, Kao L, Rebar RW, Muse K. Urinary beta-FSH subunit concentrations in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women: a biomarker for ovarian reserve. Menopause 2003; 10 (6) 526-533
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 101 Oosterhuis GJ, Lambalk CB, Michgelsen HW, De Koning CH, Vermes I, Schoemaker J. Follicle-stimulating hormone measured in unextracted urine: a reliable tool for easy assessment of ovarian capacity. Fertil Steril 1998; 70 (3) 544-548
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar