Brustchirurgie. DIEP-Flap: Luxuschirurgie in der Brustrekonstruktion?

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Die Entwicklung freier Transplantate zur Brustrekonstruktion ist eine logische Weiterentwicklung im Bestreben, Patientinnen nach ablativen Operationsverfahren eine dauerhaft stabile Rekonstruktion mit Eigengewebe anbieten zu können.

• Literatur

• 1 Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction. An experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Surg 1979; 13: 423-427
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Friedman RJ, Argenta LC, Anderson R. Deep inferior epigastric free flap for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 455-458
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 645-648
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 32-38
  Google Scholar
• 5 Atisha D, Alderman AK. A systematic review of abdominal wall functioning following abdominal flaps for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63: 222-230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Hoffmann J, Wallwiener D. Classifying breast cancer surgery: A novel complexity-based system for oncological, oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures, and proof of principle by analysis of 1225 operations in 1166 patients. BMC Cancer 2009; 9: 108-116
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Hoffmann J, Wallwiener D. Breast cancer surgery and financial reimbursement in Germany. Breast Care 2012; 7: 384-388
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 de Wildt RP, Enajat M, Sawor JH et al. The unilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: comparing university to community hospital. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012; 46: 159-162
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Nahabedian MY. Overview of perforator imaging and flap perfusion technologies. Clin Plast Surg 2011; 38: 165-174
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Di Candia M, Al Asfoor A, Jessop ZM et al. Previous multiple abdominal surgeries: a valid contradiction to abdominal free flap breast reconstruction?. Eplasty 2012; 12: 286-303
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Dragu A, Unglaub F, Wolf MB et al. Scars and perforator-based flaps in the abdominal region: A contradiction?. Can J Surg 2010; 53: 137-142
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Peek A, Müller M, Ackermann G et al. The free gracilis perforator flap: Anatomical study and clinical refinements of a new perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 578-588
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Papp C, Windhofer C, Gruber S. Breast reconstruction with the fasciocutaneous infragluteal free flap (FCI). Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58: 131-136
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M et al. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1529-1544
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Hamdi M, Rasheed MZ. Advances in autologous breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2012; 39: 477-490
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Ogunleye AA, de Blacam C, Curtis MS et al. An analysis of delayed reconstruction outcomes as recorded in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: 289-295
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gart MS, Smetona JT, Hanwright PJ et al. Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216: 229-238
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar