Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2011; 28(3): 169-176
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1265828
© Thieme Medical Publishers

A Pilot Study to Evaluate Knowledge and Attitudes of Illinois Pediatricians toward Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease and Cystic Fibrosis

Alexander P. Stark1 , Colleen Walsh Lang2 , Lainie Friedman Ross3
  • 1Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Chicago, Illinois
  • 2Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • 3Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
09 September 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

In Illinois, newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease (SCD) began in 1989 and for cystic fibrosis (CF) in 2008. We measured pediatricians' knowledge and attitudes regarding CF and SCD, the significance of carrier status, and NBS methodologies. Of 730 eligible Illinois pediatricians randomly selected from the American Academy of Pediatrics Web-based directory, 391 (54%) fully or partially completed the survey. Approximately three-fifths were women, two-thirds were Caucasians, and one-quarter had specialty training. Ninety-seven percent (377/390) and 93% (364/391) of respondents have at one point cared for a patient with SCD and CF, respectively, and virtually all support NBS for SCD (389/391, 99.5%) and CF (382/389, 98%). Overall mean knowledge of SCD (81.2%) and CF (84.5%) was high but did not correlate with self-reported familiarity. Questions regarding the interpretation of NBS results were less well understood, with 37% of our respondents unaware that Illinois NBS identifies all infants with sickle cell trait, and 28% unaware that Illinois NBS does not identify all infants who are CF carriers. Pediatricians support NBS but need additional education about the meaning of a positive and negative screen with respect to carrier detection to effectively counsel or appropriately refer.

KEYWORDS

Newborn screening - sickle cell disease - cystic fibrosis - knowledge - attitudes and beliefs - genetic testing

REFERENCES

  • 1 Guthrie R, Susi A. A simple phenylalanine method for detecting phenylketonuria in large populations of newborn infants.  Pediatrics. 1963;  32 338-343
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Committee for the Study of Inborn Errors or Metabolism .National Research Council: Genetic Screening: Programs, Principles and Research. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 1977: 388
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Swazey J P. Phenylketonuria: a case study in biomedical legislation.  J Urban Law. 1971;  48 883-931
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gaston M H, Verter J I, Woods G et al.. Prophylaxis with oral penicillin in children with sickle cell anemia. A randomized trial.  N Engl J Med. 1986;  314 1593-1599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Consensus Conference . Newborn screening for sickle cell disease and other hemoglobinopathies.  JAMA. 1987;  258 1205-1209
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grosse S D, Boyle C A, Botkin J R et al.. Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: evaluation of benefits and risks and recommendations for state newborn screening programs.  MMWR. 2004;  53 1-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 American College of Medical Genetics . Newborn screening: toward a uniform screening panel and system.  Genet Med. 2006;  8 (Suppl 1) 1S-252S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Secretary's Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children .US Department of Health and Human Services Human Resources and Service Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau: Meeting Minutes from September 2004. Available at: http://www.hrsa.gov/heritabledisorderscommittee/meetings/2004september/2ndmeeting.htm Accessed June 24, 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Tarini B A, Christakis D A, Welch H G. State newborn screening in the tandem mass spectrometry era: more tests, more false-positive results.  Pediatrics. 2006;  118 448-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 American Academy of Pediatrics Newborn Screening Authoring Committee . Newborn screening expands: recommendations for pediatricians and medical homes—implications for the system.  Pediatrics. 2008;  121 192-217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hofman K J, Tambor E S, Chase G A, Geller G, Faden R R, Holtzman N A. Physicians' knowledge of genetics and genetic tests.  Acad Med. 1993;  68 625-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Holtzman N A. Primary care physicians as providers of frontline genetic services.  Fetal Diagn Ther. 1993;  8 (Suppl 1) 213-219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Metcalfe S, Hurworth R, Newstead J, Robins R. Needs assessment study of genetics education for general practitioners in Australia.  Genet Med. 2002;  4 71-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Baars M J, Scherpbier A J, Schuwirth L W et al.. Deficient knowledge of genetics relevant for daily practice among medical students nearing graduation.  Genet Med. 2005;  7 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Gennaccaro M, Waisbren S E, Marsden D. The knowledge gap in expanded newborn screening: survey results from paediatricians in Massachusetts.  J Inherit Metab Dis. 2005;  28 819-824
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Thompson D B, Ahrens M J, LeRoy B S, Brown D, Berry S A. Newborn blood spot screening and genetic services: a survey of Minnesota primary care physicians.  Genet Med. 2005;  7 564-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Adewuyi J O. Knowledge of and attitudes to sickle cell disease and sickle carrier screening among new graduates of Nigerian tertiary educational institutions.  Niger Postgrad Med J. 2000;  7 120-123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) .Sickle cell quiz. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/sicklecell/quiz/ Accessed June 24, 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Smiers F J, Krishnamurti L, Lucarelli G. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hemoglobinopathies: current practice and emerging trends.  Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010;  57 181-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Newborn Screening . Serving the family from birth to the medical home. A report from the Newborn Screening Task Force convened in Washington DC, May 10-11, 2000.  Pediatrics. 2000;  106 383-427
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Abramson S, Stein J, Schaufele M, Frates E, Rogan S. Personal exercise habits and counseling practices of primary care physicians: a national survey.  Clin J Sport Med. 2000;  10 40-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Acharya K, Ackerman P D, Ross L F. Pediatricians' attitudes toward expanding newborn screening. Pediatrics 2005;116:e476–e484. Available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/116/4/e476 Accessed August 27, 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kinsella T D, Verhoef M J. Determinants of Canadian physicians' opinions about legalized physician-assisted suicide: a national survey.  Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1999;  32 211-215
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Linn L S, Yager J, Leake B. Professional vs. personal factors related to physicians' attitudes toward drug testing.  J Drug Educ. 1990;  20 95-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 May J A, Warltier D C, Pagel P S. Attitudes of anesthesiologists about addiction and its treatment: a survey of Illinois and Wisconsin members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.  J Clin Anesth. 2002;  14 284-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schoenberger N E, Matheis R J, Shiflett S C, Cotter A C. Opinions and practices of medical rehabilitation professionals regarding prayer and meditation.  J Altern Complement Med. 2002;  8 59-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kemper A R, Uren R L, Moseley K L, Clark S J. Primary care physicians' attitudes regarding follow-up care for children with positive newborn screening results.  Pediatrics. 2006;  118 1836-1841
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Grossman L K, Holtzman N A, Charney E, Schwartz A D. Neonatal screening and genetic counseling for sickle cell trait.  Am J Dis Child. 1985;  139 241-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Farrell M, Certain L, Farrell P. Genetic counseling and risk communication services of newborn screening programs.  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;  155 120-126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kladny B, Gettig E A, Krishnamurti L. Systematic follow-up and case management of the abnormal newborn screen can improve acceptance of genetic counseling for sickle cell or other hemoglobinopathy trait.  Genet Med. 2005;  7 139-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Giusti R, Badgwell A, Iglesias A D. New York State Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Consortium .New York State cystic fibrosis consortium: the first 2.5 years of experience with cystic fibrosis newborn screening in an ethnically diverse population. Pediatrics 2007;119:e460–e467. Available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/119/2/e460 Accessed August 27, 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Starfield B, Holtzman N A, Roland M O, Sibbald B, Harris R, Harris H. Primary care and genetic services. Health care in evolution.  Eur J Public Health. 2002;  12 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Asch D A, Jedrziewski M K, Christakis N A. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;  50 1129-1136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kellerman S E, Herold J. Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.  Am J Prev Med. 2001;  20 61-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Lainie Friedman RossM.D. Ph.D. 

University of Chicago, Department of Pediatrics

5841 S. Maryland Ave MC 6098, Chicago, IL 60637

Email: lross@uchicago.edu

      >