Vade Mecum in ERCP, a roadmap to success: Tips from experts for excelling in ERCP

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is operator-dependent and traditionally, the apprenticeship model, in which experts are considered to be role models, has been adopted for it. The aim of this study was to develop a practical guide compiling tips from experts to help guide trainees to succeed in ERCP.

Methods A web-based survey was created to understand the professional development of ERCP experts, the investments they made, the obstacles they overcame, and the quotes that guided their professional life. ERCP experts worldwide were invited to participate.

Results Fifty-three experts (of 71; 74.6%) from 24 countries answered the survey. Experts started ERCP training early (average age 31 years; range, 24–52 years) and it often was combined with training for endoscopic ultrasound. A long training period (average 21 months; range, 3–120 months) was needed to achieve competence, frequently in another department, and it was commonly complemented with research in the field (76.5%). “Time and practice” were the most worthwhile investments they made to achieve success. “Sports” were an area outside endoscopy frequently considered to be important to acquire the skills necessary to excel in ERCP. “Lack of dedicated time for training” and “peer competition” were the biggest obstacles the experts faced. Several pieces of advice were given to the experts, such as to be resilient, careful, patient, responsible, and hard-working. “Personal life” was mentioned as an undeniably crucial factor for achieving long-term success that should not be forgotten.

Conclusions This survey is the first to provide insight regarding the professional trajectory of renowned ERCP experts worldwide, providing valuable recommendations to help trainees excel in ERCP.

Publication History

Received: 14 September 2023

Accepted after revision: 12 December 2023

Article published online:
26 April 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Wani S, Keswani RN, Han S. et al. Competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, from training through independent practice. Gastroenterology 2018; 155: 1483-1494.e7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Wani S, Hall M, Wang AY. et al. Variation in learning curves and competence for ERCP among advanced enoscopy trainees by using cumulative sum analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 711-719.e11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Wani S, Han S, Simon V. et al. Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1160-1168.e9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Dumonceau J-M, Kapral C, Aabakken L. et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 127-149 DOI: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. (PMID: 31863440)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Johnson G, Webster G, Boškoski I. et al. Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointest Endosc (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1071-1087
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Domagk D, Oppong K, Aabakken L. et al. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1116-1127 DOI: 10.1055/a-0749-8767. (PMID: 30340220)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Campos S, Arvanitakis M, Deviere J. A portrait of ERCP and EUS training programs in Europe: current practices and opportunities for improvement. UEG J 2023; 11: 350-360
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Wani S, Keswani R, Hall M. et al. A prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence in endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography among advanced endoscopy trainees: the rapid assessment of trainee endoscopy skills study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 1758-1767.e11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, Rauws EAJ. et al. Competence development in ERCP: the learning curve of novice trainees. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 949-955 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377930. (PMID: 25208031)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Wani S. oes trainee participation impact critical outcomes in ERCP?: Referring to Voiosu T et al. p. 115–122. D Endoscopy 2020; 52: 92-93
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Ericsson KA, Harwell KW. Deliberate practice and proposed limits on the effects of practice on the acquisition of expert performance: Why the original definition matters and recommendations for future research. Front Psychol 2019; 10: 2396 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396. (PMID: 31708836)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ericsson KA, Prietula MJ, Cokely ET. The making of an expert. Harv Bus Rev 2007; 85: 114-121 (PMID: 17642130)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Gallo C, Boškoski I, Matteo MV. et al. Training in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: a critical assessment of the broad scenario of training programs and models. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 15: 675-688
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Jovanovic I, Fry L, Rustemovic N. et al. Initial validation of a simple, nonbiological, mechanical ERCP training model for cannulation and stent placement. Endoscopy 2015; 47: E585-E586 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393389. (PMID: 26671536)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Boškoski I, Costamagna G. The Boškoski-Costamagna ERCP Trainer: from dream to reality. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 593-593 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-103419. (PMID: 27239823)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 van der Wiel S, Koch A, Bruno M. Face and construct validity of a novel mechanical ERCP simulator. Endosc Int Open 2018; 06: E758-E765 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-101754. (PMID: 29881768)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Gladwell M. Outliers: The story of success. San Francisco; CA: Brown and Company: 2008
  Google Scholar
• 18 Pratt DD. Five perspectives on teaching in adult and higher education. Melbourne: Krieger Publishing Co; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 19 Ghildiyal R. Role of sports in the development of an individual and role of psychology in sports. Mens Sana Monogr 2015; 13: 165-170 DOI: 10.4103/0973-1229.153335. (PMID: 25838736)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Boškoski I, Costamagna G. How to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 2037-2040 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.019. (PMID: 32197979)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Kolb DA. Experiential learning: experience as source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1984
  Google Scholar
• 22 Campos S, Devière J, Arvanitakis M. Who will excel in advanced endoscopy? A study assessing the criteria and perceptions of experts with regard to selection of ERCP and EUS trainees. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E268-E275 DOI: 10.1055/a-2017-3827. (PMID: 36968977)
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. 1st ed. et al. Ericsson KA, Charness N, Feltovich PJ. Cambridge University Press; 2006. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511816796
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material