Evidenz für die minimalinvasive Ösophagusresektion

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten zwei Jahrzehnten hat die minimalinvasive Chirurgie in allen Bereichen einen extremen Zuwachs an Bedeutung erlangt. Hierbei sind insbesondere in der onkologischen Chirurgie Operationsverfahren etabliert worden, ohne dass hierfür die notwendige Evidenz generiert wurde, die eine gleichwertige Qualität zu den offenen Verfahren nachgewiesen hat. Hierfür wurde erst in den vergangenen Jahren durch randomisiert-kontrollierte Studien und nachfolgende Metaanalysen die entsprechende Evidenz geniert. In diesem Artikel wird die Evidenz für die minimalinvasive Ösophagusresektion beschrieben und ein Überblick über die aktuelle Literatur in den jeweiligen Verfahren zusammengefasst.

Abstract

In the course of the last 20 years, minimally invasive therapy has become much more important in all areas. In particular, surgical procedures have been established in oncological surgery, even without generating the necessary evidence to assure that the quality is equal to that achieved with open procedures. For this purpose, it has only been in recent years that appropriate randomised controlled studies followed by meta-analyses have been carried out. In this article, we summarise the evidence for minimally invasive resection of the oesophagus and review current literature for each procedure.

Publication History

Received: 20 November 2023

Accepted: 27 December 2023

Article published online:
05 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• Literatur

• 1 Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: S3-Leitlinie Magenkarzinom, Langversion 2.0 – August 2019. AWMF Registernummer: 032/009OL. Accessed January 18, 2024 at: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Magenkarzinom/Version_2/LL_Magenkarzinom_Langversion_2.0.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Peyre CG, Hagen JA, DeMeester SR. et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 549-556 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318188c474. (PMID: 18936567)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie: S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik und Therapie der Plattenepithelkarzinome und Adenokarzinome des Ösophagus. Langversion 2.0 – Dezember 2018. AWMF Registernummer: 021/023OL. Accessed January 18, 2024 at: https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Oesophaguskarzinom/Version_2/LL_Oesophagus_Langversion_2.0.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Hermanek P. Tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas: histopathology, staging and prognosis. Anticancer Res 1999; 19: 2393-2396 (PMID: 10470164)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Dexter SP, Sue-Ling H, McMahon MJ. et al. Circumferential resection margin involvement: an independent predictor of survival following surgery for oesophageal cancer. Gut 2001; 48: 667-670 DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.5.667. (PMID: 11302966)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Khan OA, Fitzgerald JJ, Soomro I. et al. Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Cancer 2003; 88: 1549-1552 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600931. (PMID: 12771920)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C. et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1: 138-143 (PMID: 1669393)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Buess G, Becker HD. [Minimally invasive surgery in tumors of the esophagus]. Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1990; 1990: 1355-1360 (PMID: 1983542)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA. et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995; 5: 1-5 (PMID: 7735533)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Parry K, Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC. et al. Current status of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Esophagus 2017; 30: 1-7 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12477. (PMID: 26919257)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Cuschieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1992; 37: 7-11 (PMID: 1573620)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Paireder M, Asari R, Kristo I. et al. Morbidity in open versus minimally invasive hybrid esophagectomy (MIOMIE): Long-term results of a randomized controlled clinical study. Eur Surg 2018; 50: 249-255 DOI: 10.1007/s10353-018-0552-y. (PMID: 30546384)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Mariette C, Markar SR, Dabakuyo-Yonli TS. et al. Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 380: 152-162 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101. (PMID: 30625052)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F. et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2012; 26: 381-390 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1883-y. (PMID: 21898014)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Nguyen NT, Schauer PR, Luketich JD. Combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach to esophagectomy. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 188: 328-332 DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00304-4. (PMID: 10065824)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O. et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 2012; 256: 95-103 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603. (PMID: 22668811)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R. et al. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1868-1875 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0116-1. (PMID: 19609827)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Schoppmann SF, Prager G, Langer FB. et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 3044-3053 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1083-1. (PMID: 20464423)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A. et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 3031-3040 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-010-1153-1. (PMID: 20186484)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Evidence to support the use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2012; 147: 768-776 DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1326. (PMID: 22911078)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW. et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379: 1887-1892 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. (PMID: 22552194)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Cuesta MA. et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 232-236 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002171. (PMID: 28187044)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Guo M, Xie B, Sun X. et al. A comparative study of the therapeutic effect in two protocols: video-assisted thoracic surgery combined with laparoscopy versus right open transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer management. Chin-Ger J Clin Oncol 2013; 12: 68-71 DOI: 10.1007/s10330-012-0966-0.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Ma S, Yan T, Liu D. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the lateral-prone position: Experience of 124 cases in a single center. Thorac Cancer 2018; 9: 37-43 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12524. (PMID: 29058363)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Franchetti Y. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: results of a prospective phase II multicenter trial-the eastern cooperative oncology group (E2202) study. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 702-707 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000993. (PMID: 25575253)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Palazzo F, Rosato EL, Chaudhary A. et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides significant survival advantage compared with open or hybrid esophagectomy for patients with cancers of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220: 672-679 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.023. (PMID: 25667145)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Yerokun BA, Sun Z, Yang CJ. et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102: 416-423 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.078. (PMID: 27157326)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Horgan S, Berger RA, Elli EF. et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy. Am Surg 2003; 69: 624-626 (PMID: 12889629)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Gutt CN, Bintintan VV, Köninger J. et al. Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2006; 391: 428-434 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-006-0055-3. (PMID: 16791636)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 van Hillegersberg R, Boone J, Draaisma WA. et al. First experience with robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 1435-1439 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0674-8. (PMID: 16703427)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Galvani CA, Gorodner MV, Moser F. et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 188-195 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9441-3. (PMID: 17939004)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Weksler B, Sharma P, Moudgill N. et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25: 403-409 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01246.x. (PMID: 21899652)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Suda K, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y. et al. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the prone position: technical report and short-term outcomes. World J Surg 2012; 36: 1608-1616 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1538-8. (PMID: 22392356)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Langenhoff BS, Krabbe PF, Wobbes T. et al. Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 643-652 DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01755.x. (PMID: 11350434)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Marks JH, Nassif Do GJ, Frenkel JL. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2012; 58: 201-211 (PMID: 22971631)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Taioli E, Schwartz RM, Lieberman-Cribbin W. et al. Quality of Life after Open or Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer-A Systematic Review. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017; 29: 377-390 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.08.013. (PMID: 28939239)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Zhang Y, Yang X, Geng D. et al. The change of health-related quality of life after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2018; 16: 97 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1330-9. (PMID: 29793487)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H. et al. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2016; 14: 304 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7. (PMID: 27927246)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 van den Berg JW, Luketich JD, Cheong E. Oesophagectomy: The expanding role of minimally invasive surgery in oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 36–37: 75-80 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2018.11.001. (PMID: 30551859)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Strobel O, Büchler MW. The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 172-173 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8998. (PMID: 23180610)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 van Workum F, Fransen L, Luyer MD. et al. Learning curves in minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24: 4974-4978 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i44.4974. (PMID: 30510372)
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar