Endoscopy 2024; 56(05): 345-352
DOI: 10.1055/a-2235-3286
Original article

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy versus botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of refractory gastroparesis: results of a double-blind randomized controlled study

1   Hôpital Nord, Gastroenterology, AP-HM, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36900)
,
François Mion
2   Physiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36609)
,
Mathieu Pioche
3   Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Disease Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36609)
,
Victor Garbay
1   Hôpital Nord, Gastroenterology, AP-HM, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36900)
,
Karine Baumstarck
4   Public Health, Aix-Marseille Université Faculté de Medecine, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN90255)
,
Mohamed Boucekine
4   Public Health, Aix-Marseille Université Faculté de Medecine, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN90255)
,
Antoine Debourdeau
5   MUSE Montpellier Université, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
,
Jérôme Rivory
3   Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Disease Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36609)
,
1   Hôpital Nord, Gastroenterology, AP-HM, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36900)
,
Véronique Vitton
1   Hôpital Nord, Gastroenterology, AP-HM, Marseille, France (Ringgold ID: RIN36900)
› Author Affiliations
Fondation de l'Avenir pour la Recherche Médicale Appliquée

Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT02927886, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Prospective randomized bicenter study

Abstract

Introduction Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising technique for treating refractory gastroparesis. We present the first double-blind randomized study comparing the clinical efficacy of G-POEM versus pyloric botulinum toxin injection (BTI).

Methods This randomized study, conducted in two expert centers, enrolled patients with refractory gastroparesis, medically managed for >6 months and confirmed by gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES), into two groups, G-POEM versus BTI, with follow-up of 1 year. The primary end point was the 3-month clinical efficacy, defined as a >1-point decrease in the mean Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score. Secondary end points were: 1-year efficacy, GES evolution, adverse events, and quality of life.

Results 40 patients (22 women; mean age 48.1 [SD 17.4]), with mean symptom duration of 5.8 (SD 5.7) years, were randomized. Etiologies included idiopathic (n=18), diabetes (n=11), postoperative (n=6), and mixed (n=4). G-POEM showed a higher 3-month clinical success than BTI (65% vs. 40%, respectively; P=0.10), along with non-significantly higher 1-year clinical success (60% vs. 40%, respectively) on intention-to-treat analysis. The GCSI decreased in both groups at 3 months and 1 year. Only three minor adverse events occurred in the G-POEM group. The GES improvement rate was 72% in the G-POEM group versus 50% in the BTI group (non-significant).

Conclusion G-POEM seems to have a higher clinically relevant success rate than BTI, but this was not statistically demonstrated. This study confirms the interest in treatments targeting the pylorus, either mechanically or chemically, for managing refractory gastroparesis.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 05 April 2023

Accepted after revision: 23 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
23 December 2023

Article published online:
19 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany