Efficacy of Cranial Orthosis for Plagiocephaly Based on 2D and 3D Evaluation

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background With the advent of cranial orthoses as therapeutic medical devices for the treatment of severe positional head deformities in Japan, an increasing number of patients are being treated with them. However, assessing the effectiveness of a treatment is often difficult due to the use of different metrics. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cranial orthoses for deformational plagiocephaly using two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) evaluation metrics.

Methods We conducted a retrospective study of infant patients with deformational plagiocephaly who underwent cranial orthosis treatment. We evaluated the severity of deformational plagiocephaly using cranial asymmetry (CA) and the cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI) as 2D metrics, and anterior and posterior symmetry ratios as 3D metrics. The patients were divided into 24 subgroups based on the initial severity of each outcome and their age at the start of treatment. We analyzed the changes in outcomes and correlations within improvements across the age and severity categories.

Results Overall, 1,038 infants were included in this study. The mean CA, CVAI, and anterior and posterior symmetry ratios improved significantly after cranial orthosis treatment. The improvement in each score was greater in patients with more severe initial deformities and in those who underwent treatment at a younger age.

Conclusion Cranial orthosis treatment was effective in correcting deformational plagiocephaly in infants, as demonstrated by improvements in both 2D and 3D metrics. Patients with more severe initial deformities and those who underwent treatment at a younger age showed greater improvement.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: H.K. (Kajita), I.T.

Data curation: H.K. (Kajita)

Formal analysis: not relevant

Funding acquisition: I.T., H.K. (Kajita)

Investigation: H.K. (Kajita)

Methodology: H.K. (Kajita), I.T.

Project administration: I.T.

Resources: I.T.

Software: H.K. (Kajita)

Supervision: I.T., H.K. (Komuro), S.N., I.K., K.S.

Validation: I.T., H.K. (Komuro), S.N., I.K., K.S.

Visualization: H.K. (Kajita)

Writing—original draft: H.K. (Kajita)

Writing—review and editing: H.K. (Kajita), I.T.

Ethical Approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (approval number: T-22001) with a waiver of consent.

Publication History

Received: 04 July 2023

Accepted: 30 November 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
04 December 2023

Article published online:
24 January 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Rogers GF. Deformational plagiocephaly, brachycephaly, and scaphocephaly. Part I: terminology, diagnosis, and etiopathogenesis. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (01) 9-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Takamatsu A, Hikosaka M, Kaneko T, Mikami M, Kaneko A. Evaluation of the molding helmet therapy for Japanese infants with deformational plagiocephaly. JMA J 2021; 4 (01) 50-60
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Tamber MS, Nikas D, Beier A, Baird LC, Bauer DF, Durham S. et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guideline on the role of cranial molding orthosis (helmet) therapy for patients with positional plagiocephaly. Neurosurgery 2016; 79 (05) E632-E633
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Aihara Y, Komatsu K, Dairoku H, Kubo O, Hori T, Okada Y. Cranial molding helmet therapy and establishment of practical criteria for management in Asian infant positional head deformity. Childs Nerv Syst 2014; 30 (09) 1499-1509
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Noto T, Nagano N, Kato R. et al. Natural-course evaluation of infants with positional severe plagiocephaly using a three-dimensional scanner in Japan: comparison with those who received cranial helmet therapy. J Clin Med 2021; 10 (16) 3531
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Graham T, Gilbert N, Witthoff K, Gregory T, Walsh M. Significant factors influencing the effectiveness of cranial remolding orthoses in infants with deformational plagiocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 2019; 30 (06) 1710-1713
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Graham T, Adams-Huet B, Gilbert N, Witthoff K, Gregory T, Walsh M. Effects of initial age and severity on cranial remolding orthotic treatment for infants with deformational plagiocephaly. J Clin Med 2019; 8 (08) 1097
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Meyer-Marcotty P, Böhm H, Linz C. et al. Head orthesis therapy in infants with unilateral positional plagiocephaly: an interdisciplinary approach to broadening the range of orthodontic treatment. J Orofac Orthop 2012; 73 (02) 151-165
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Meyer-Marcotty P, Böhm H, Linz C, Kochel J, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Schweitzer T. Three-dimensional analysis of cranial growth from 6 to 12 months of age. Eur J Orthod 2014; 36 (05) 489-496
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Kato R, Nagano N, Hashimoto S. et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional evaluations of cranial asymmetry in deformational plagiocephaly using a three-dimensional scanner. Children (Basel) 2022; 9 (06) 788
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Loveday BP, de Chalain TB. Active counterpositioning or orthotic device to treat positional plagiocephaly?. J Craniofac Surg 2001; 12 (04) 308-313
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Koizumi T, Komuro Y, Hashizume K, Yanai A. Cephalic index of Japanese children with normal brain development. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (05) 1434-1437
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 De Stefani A, Barone M, Hatami Alamdari S. et al. Validation of Vectra 3D imaging systems: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19 (14) 8820
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Metzler P, Sun Y, Zemann W. et al. Validity of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for cranio-maxillofacial anthropometric measurements. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 18 (03) 297-304
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Othman SA, Majawit LP, Wan Hassan WN, Wey MC, Mohd Razi R. Anthropometric study of three-dimensional facial morphology in Malay adults. PLoS ONE 2016; 11 (10) e0164180
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Othman SA, Aidil Koay NA. Three-dimensional facial analysis of Chinese children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 31335
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Othman SA, Saffai L, Wan Hassan WN. Validity and reproducibility of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for the maxillofacial anthropometric measurement on cleft patients. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24 (08) 2853-2866
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Nieberle F, Spoerl S, Lottner LM. Direct anthropometry overestimates cranial asymmetry-3D digital photography proves to be a reliable alternative. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13 (10) 1707
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Kim SY, Park MS, Yang JI, Yim SY. Comparison of helmet therapy and counter positioning for deformational plagiocephaly. Ann Rehabil Med 2013; 37 (06) 785-795
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Kunz F, Schweitzer T, Große S. et al. Head orthosis therapy in positional plagiocephaly: longitudinal 3D-investigation of long-term outcomes, compared with untreated infants and with a control group. Eur J Orthod 2019; 41 (01) 29-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Plank LH, Giavedoni B, Lombardo JR, Geil MD, Reisner A. Comparison of infant head shape changes in deformational plagiocephaly following treatment with a cranial remolding orthosis using a noninvasive laser shape digitizer. J Craniofac Surg 2006; 17 (06) 1084-1091
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Ifflaender S, Rüdiger M, Koch A, Burkhardt W. Three-dimensional digital capture of head size in neonates - a method evaluation. PLoS One 2013; 8 (04) e61274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE. et al; SciPy 1.0 Contributors. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods 2020; 17 (03) 261-272
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Freudlsperger C, Steinmacher S, Saure D. et al. Impact of severity and therapy onset on helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016; 44 (02) 110-115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Moss SD. Nonsurgical, nonorthotic treatment of occipital plagiocephaly: what is the natural history of the misshapen neonatal head?. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (05) 667-670
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Schweitzer T, Böhm H, Linz C. et al. Three-dimensional analysis of positional plagiocephaly before and after molding helmet therapy in comparison to normal head growth. Childs Nerv Syst 2013; 29 (07) 1155-1161
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Kluba S, Kraut W, Calgeer B, Reinert S, Krimmel M. Treatment of positional plagiocephaly–helmet or no helmet?. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014; 42 (05) 683-688
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar