The BougieCap – a new method for endoscopic treatment of complex benign esophageal stenosis: results from a multicenter study

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background A major limitation of current treatment strategies for nonmalignant upper gastrointestinal stenoses is the lack of either optical or haptic feedback during dilation. Wire guidance and fluoroscopy is often necessary to control the position.

Methods A novel device for endoscopic dilation, the BougieCap (Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tübingen, Germany) was evaluated in a prospective multicenter trial. Primary outcome was successful dilation of stenosis and secondary outcome was alteration in dysphagia symptoms in short-term follow-up. 

Results 50 patients with benign esophageal strictures were included. Endoscopic bougienage was successful in 96 %. Bougienage failed in two cases because of high resistance. Symptoms of dysphagia decreased significantly after bougienage (59.0 points at Day 0 vs. 28.6 points at Day 14; P < 0.001). Adverse events were loss of BougieCap into the stomach in two cases; no severe adverse events were reported.

Conclusions Endoscopic treatment of benign stenoses using the BougieCap enabled direct visual control of the bougienage procedure. This might help to adapt treatment more precisely to the stricture. Symptoms of dysphagia were improved in short-term follow-up. Additional wire guidance may be used for selected cases (e. g. narrow lumen, pediatric scope).

• References

• 1 Silbergleit A, Schultz L, Jacobson B. et al. The Dysphagia Handicap Index: development and validation. Dysphagia 2012; 27: 46-52
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Sami S, Haboubi H, Ang Y. et al. UK guidelines on oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 2018; 67: 1000-1023
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Lew R, Kochman M. A review of endoscopic methods of esophageal dilation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2002; 35: 117-126
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Adler D, Siddiqui A. Endoscopic management of esophageal strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 35-43
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Goyal G, Sultania S, Meena B. et al. Refractory benign esophageal strictures. J Dig Endosc 2016; 7: 1
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Riley S, Attwood S. Guidelines on the use of oesophageal dilatation in clinical practice. Gut 2004; 53 (Suppl. 01) i1-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Grooteman K, Wong Kee Song L, Vleggaar F. et al. Non-adherence to the rule of 3 does not increase the risk of adverse events in esophageal dilation. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 332-337.e1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Shah P, Kochman M. Alternative techniques for treating benign esophageal strictures. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 12: 225-230
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Saeed Z, Winchester C, Ferro P. et al. Prospective randomized comparison of polyvinyl bougies and through-the-scope balloons for dilation of peptic strictures of the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 41: 189-195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Jones M, Bratten J, McClave S. The Optical Dilator: a clear, over-the-scope bougie with sequential dilating segments. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 840-845
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez P. et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 489-496
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar