Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conservatively treated acetabular fractures: A retrospective analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: There are a few studies reporting the long term outcome of conservatively treated acetabular fractures. The present study aims to evaluate the quality of reduction, and radiological and functional outcome in displaced acetabular fractures treated conservatively.

Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine patients (55 men and 14 women) with 71 displaced acetabular fractures (mean age 38.6 years) managed conservatively were retrospectively evaluated. There were 11 posterior wall, 5 posterior column, 6 anterior column, 13 transverse, 2 posterior column with posterior wall, 9 transverse with posterior wall, 6 T-shaped, 1 anterior column with posterior hemi-transverse, and 18 both-column fractures. The follow-up radiographs were graded according to the criteria developed by Matta J. Functional outcome was assessed using Harris hip score and Merle d’Aubigne and Postel score at final followup. Average follow-up was 4.34 years (range 2–11 years).

Results: Patients with congruent reduction (n=45) had good or excellent functional outcome. Radiologic outcome in incongruent reduction (n=26) was good or excellent in 6 and fair or poor in 20 hips. The functional outcome in patients with incongruent reduction was good or excellent in 16 and satisfactory or poor in 10 hips. Good to excellent radiologic and functional outcome was achieved in all patients with posterior wall fractures including four having more than 50% of broken wall. Good to excellent functional outcome was observed in 88.8% of both-column fractures with secondary congruence despite medial subluxation.

Conclusions: Nonoperative treatment of acetabular fractures can give good radiological and functional outcome in congruent reduction. Posterior wall fractures with a congruous joint without subluxation on computed tomography axial section, posterior column, anterior column, infratectal transverse or T-shaped, and both-column fractures may be managed conservatively. Small osteochondral fragments in the cotyloid fossa or non-weight-bearing part of the hip with a congruous joint do not seem to adversely affect the functional outcome. Displaced transverse fractures with “V” sign may require operative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hofmann AA, Dahl CP, Wyatt RWB. Experience with acetabular fractures. J Trauma 1984;24:750–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Matta JM. Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:1632–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moed BR, Carr SE, Watson JT. Open reduction and internal fixation of posterior wall fractures of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;377:57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tornetta P 3rd. Displaced acetabular fractures: Indications for operative and nonoperative management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2001;9:18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H. Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:2–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moed BR, Willson Carr SE, Watson JT. Results of operative treatment of fractures of the posterior wall of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002;84:752–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roetman B, Seybold D, Keil D, Muhr G, Mollenhoff G. Long-term results after acetabular fractures with respect to heterotopic ossifications. Zentrabl Chir 2006;131:188–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Petsatodis G, Antonarakos P, Chalidis B, Papadopoulos P, Christoforidis J, Pournaras J. Surgically treated acetabular fractures via a single posterior approach with a follow-up of 2-10 years. Injury 2007;38:334–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma B, Zhang Y, Zhang X. Operative management of acetabular fracture. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 2006;20:640–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmali N, Ertem K, Inan M, Ayan I, Denizhan Y. Clinical and radiologic results of surgically-treated acetabular fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2003;37:97–101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen HW, Zhao GS. Surgical treatment of acetabular posterior wall fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2008;21:674–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiu FY, Lo WH, Chen TH, Chen CM, Huang CK, Ma HL. Fractures of posterior wall of acetabulum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996;115:273–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ochs BG, Marintschev I, Hoyer H, Rolauffs B, Culemann U, Pohlemann T, et al. Changes in the treatment of acetabular fractures over 15 years: Analysis of 1266 cases treated by the German Pelvic Multicentre Study Group (DAO/DGU). Injury 2010;41:839–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sen RK, Veerappa LA. Long-term outcome of conservatively managed displaced acetabular fractures. J Trauma 2009;67:155–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heeg M, Oostvogel HJ, Klasen HJ. Conservative treatment of acetabular fractures: The role of the weight bearing dome and anatomic reduction in the ultimate results. J Trauma 1987;27:555–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heeg H, Otter N, Klasen HJ. Anterior column fractures of the column. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:554–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hesp WL, Goris RJ. Conservative treatment of fractures of the acetabulum. Results after longtime follow-up. Acta Chir Belg 1988:88:27–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tipton WW, D’ Ambrosia RD, Ryle GP. Non-operative management of central fracture-dislocations of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;57:888–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matta JM, Anderson LM, Epstein HC, Hendricks P. Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:230–40.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Calkins MS, Zych G, Latta L, Borja FJ, Mnaymneh W. Computed tomography evaluation of stability in posterior fracture dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;227:152–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. d’Aubigné RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954;36:451–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Epstein HC. Posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1103–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keith JE Jr, Brashear HR Jr, Guilford WB. Stability of posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip. Quantitative assessment using computed tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:711–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vailas JC, Hurwitz S, Wiesel SW. Posterior acetabular fracture-dislocations: Fragment size, joint capsule, and stability. J Trauma 1989;29:1494–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ylinen P, Sentavirta S, Slatis P. Outcome of acetabular fractures: A 7-year follow-up. J Trauma 1989;29:19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lovric I, Jovanović S, Leksan I, Biuk E, Kristek J, Radic R. Functional status of hip joint after surgical and conservative treatment of acetabular fracture. Coll Antropol 2007;31:285–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. de Ridder VA, de Lange S, Kingma L, Hogervorst M. Results of 75 consecutive patients with an acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994;305:53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pascarella R, Maresca A, Reggiani LM, Boriani S. Intra-articular fragments in acetabular fracture-dislocation. Orthopedics 2009;32:402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenthal RE, Coker WL. Posterior fracture-dislocations of the hip: An epidemiologic review. J Trauma 1979;19:572–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matta JM, Merritt PO. Displaced acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;230:83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Weise K, Maurer F, Schrade J. Hip dislocations and hip fractures—acetabular fractures. Indication, technique and results of conservative treatment. Orthopade 1997;26:336–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jing LY, Liu GY, Hu Y, Zhang F, Ruan YP, Xu RM. Operative treatment of old acetabular fractures. Zhongguo Gu Shang 2010;23:386–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang MY, Wu XB, Zhu SW, Cao QY, Wu HH, Rong GW. Operative treatment of delayed acetabular fractures. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 2003;41:130–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wright R, Barrett K, Christie MJ, Johnson KD. Acetabular fractures: Long-term follow-up of open reduction and internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 1994;8:397–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Paraplegia and Rehabilitation, Pt. B. D. Sharma PGIMS, 22/8 FM, Medical Enclave, Rohtak, Haryana, India

    Narender Kumar Magu (Senior Professor), Rajesh Rohilla & Sanjay Arora

Authors
  1. Narender Kumar Magu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rajesh Rohilla
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sanjay Arora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narender Kumar Magu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magu, N.K., Rohilla, R. & Arora, S. Conservatively treated acetabular fractures: A retrospective analysis. IJOO 46, 36–45 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91633

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.91633

Key words

Search

Navigation