ALL Metrics
-
Views
-
Downloads
Get PDF
Get XML
Cite
Export
Track
Brief Report

Is lithium a potential treatment for the novel Wuhan (2019-nCoV) coronavirus? A scoping review

[version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]
PUBLISHED 07 Feb 2020
Author details Author details
OPEN PEER REVIEW
REVIEWER STATUS

This article is included in the Emerging Diseases and Outbreaks gateway.

This article is included in the Coronavirus collection.

Abstract

The current rapid spread of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating from Wuhan, China, calls for a rapid response from the research community. Lithium is widely used to treat bipolar disorder, but has been shown to exhibit antiviral activity. This brief review took a systematic approach to identify five in vitro studies reporting on the influence of lithium on coronaviral infections. We propose that in the case of urgent need, lithium be explored as a potential treatment or prophylaxis for the novel Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV).

Keywords

coronavirus, Coronaviridae, Wuhan, 2019-nCoV, lithium, lithium carbonate, lithium orotate, antiviral, apoptosis, glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta, GSK-3β,

Introduction

The current rapid spread of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) originating from Wuhan, China, calls for a rapid response from the research community. Lithium is known to exhibit antiviral activity, but the knowledge of its potential as a possible therapy for coronoviral infections has not been summarized yet. The aim of this brief report is to draw attention to lithium as potential 2019-nCoV treatment and prophylaxis.

Methods

On February 1st 2020 the following PubMed search was conducted with no language or time restrictions: (lithium and (coronavirus or *coronavirus or sarbecovirus or SARS or “severe acute respiratory syndrome” or MERS or “Middle East respiratory syndrome” or nobecovirus or merbecovirus or hibecovirus or embecovirus or andecovirus or buldecovirus or herdecovirus or moordecovirus or cegacovirus or igacovirus or “microhyla lentovirus” or milecovirus or alphaletovirus or tegacovirus or setracovirus or rhinacovirus or pedacovirus or “porcine epidemic diarrhea” or nyctacovirus or “nectalus velutinus” or myotacovirus or “myotis ricketti” or minunacovirus or minacovirus or luchacovirus or duvinacovirus or decacovirus or “Rhinolophus ferrumequinum” or “transmissible gastroenteritis virus” or “feline infectious peritonitis virus” or “canine coronavirus” or “murine hepatitis virus”)). The search yielded 45 articles, of which all the abstracts were charted and reviewed by two researchers.

Results

Five studies reporting on the influence of lithium on coronaviral infections were identified (Figure 1).

c86c23dc-138f-488f-b5d0-ff39c37be374_figure1.gif

Figure 1. Study flow chart.

In Vero cells, lithium chloride was shown to be effective in suppressing infection with the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), a member of the Coronaviridae family1. Not only PEDV entry and replication were inhibited in the presence of LiCl, but apoptosis as well. In MARC-145 cells, LiCl reduced the production of RNA and proteins specific to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. The authors, however, cautioned that the effect might have been dependent on LiCl presence during the early stages of infection and the increase of tumor necrosis factor-α2. In vitro studies of another porcine coronavirus causing transmissible gastroenteritis indicated that LiCl acts on both early and late stages of infection and inhibits apoptosis3. The same research group from Harbin in China reported earlier that LiCl reduced the cytopathic effect of the avian infectious bronchitis virus (also a coronavirus) in primary chicken embryo kidney cells4. In Vero cells, African green monkey kidney-derived epithelial cells, and immortalized chicken embryo fibroblasts LiCl suppressed the avian coronavirus infectious bronchitis. The antiviral activity of lithium was ascribed to a cellular effect5.

Discussion

The possible molecular mechanisms of reduced apoptosis include the inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3-beta (GSK-3β)6,7. Moreover, PEDV requires the PI3K/Akt/GSK-3α/β pathway, which can be targeted at GSK-3β by lithium8. Curiously, GSK-3β is required for template switching, a process seemingly indispensable for the production of coronaviral genomic RNA. The inhibition of GSK-3β prevents longer viral subgenomic mRNAs and the genomic RNA from being synthesized9. Their production would require GSK-3β-dependent phosphorylation of the viral nucleocapsid and subsequent recruitment of helicase DDX1.

Lithium carbonate is an orphan drug widely used in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Its safety, when used correctly, is excellent10. The main concern in the setting of an infectious disease unit would be the potential for interactions with other medication, possibly leading to the elevation of lithium levels and acute toxicity, mostly renal. This may be prevented by monitoring serum lithium concentrations. To our best knowledge, no interactions between lithium carbonate and ribavirin, lopinavir or ritonavir exist. In unconscious patients lithium carbonate could be given via a nasogastric tube. In case of lithium carbonate unavailability, lithium orotate could be explored, which, however, remains much less known to medical science despite being available as a dietary supplement. Overall, we propose that in the case of urgent need lithium be explored by physicians as a potential treatment or prophylaxis for the novel Wuhan coronavirus (2019-nCoV).

Data availability

Underlying data

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Reporting guidelines

Zenodo: PRISMA ScR checklist for ‘Is lithium a potential treatment for the novel Wuhan (2019-nCoV) coronavirus? A scoping review’. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.363757411.

The adapted reporting guidelines checklist is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

Comments on this article Comments (6)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2020
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 07 Feb 2020
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Reader Comment 01 Apr 2020
    Miguel Buxeda MD, Miguel Buxeda MD PA, Miami Florida, USA
    01 Apr 2020
    Reader Comment
    Lithium carbonate in low  dosages of 150 or 300 mg wii be sufficient to prevent the hyperinflammatory response to 2019-NCov which results in SARS. You do not need toxic dosages. ... Continue reading
  • Author Response 27 Mar 2020
    Jan Nowak, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
    27 Mar 2020
    Author Response
    Thank you for all the comments. The potential for interaction between lithium and chloroquine is discussed in the revised version of the article, which was submitted more than a week ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 23 Mar 2020
    Manteio Delphi, Forecasts Unlimited, USA
    23 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    How conveniently did this article fail to document the moderate drug interaction of QT interval prolongation between lithium and chloroquine?
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Reader Comment 23 Mar 2020
    Jim Meehan, Personal, UK
    23 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    As a mental health nurse in Liverpool UK I am very interested in this and hope epidemiologists and virologists are trialling it ASAP.
    We need to data crunch correlations between ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 21 Mar 2020
    Charlotte Ayley-Smith, University of Greenwich, Student, UK
    21 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    I am a Public Health BSc student and I have been undergoing Lithium therapy for 2 years now. I take 1000mgs of Priadel daily and I agree with a previous ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 17 Mar 2020
    Demis Cunningham, Patient, Scotland, UK
    17 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    As a lithium patient taking 800mg Li Carbonate I can vouch for its antiviral properties, I have not had a single cold or illness since commencing the drug for major ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Author details Author details
Competing interests
Grant information
Copyright
Download
 
Export To
metrics
Views Downloads
F1000Research - -
PubMed Central
Data from PMC are received and updated monthly.
- -
Citations
CITE
how to cite this article
Nowak JK and Walkowiak J. Is lithium a potential treatment for the novel Wuhan (2019-nCoV) coronavirus? A scoping review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved] F1000Research 2020, 9:93 (https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22299.1)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
track
receive updates on this article
Track an article to receive email alerts on any updates to this article.

Open Peer Review

Current Reviewer Status: ?
Key to Reviewer Statuses VIEW
ApprovedThe paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approvedFundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Version 1
VERSION 1
PUBLISHED 07 Feb 2020
Views
53
Cite
Reviewer Report 21 Feb 2020
Jean-Martin Beaulieu, Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 
Not Approved
VIEWS 53
The authors identified five previous studies reporting an effect of lithium (mostly LiCl) in corona virus in cellular systems. This is obviously a very timely question. All studies point toward beneficial effects of lithium and thus underscore the possible beneficial effect ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Beaulieu JM. Reviewer Report For: Is lithium a potential treatment for the novel Wuhan (2019-nCoV) coronavirus? A scoping review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:93 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.24598.r59736)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 03 Apr 2020
    Jan Nowak, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
    03 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Poznań, March 16th, 2020

    Dear Prof. Beaulieu,

    We are grateful for the comments that you have provided. They helped to improve our manuscript. Please find our responses below.

    Sincerely yours,

    Jan Nowak and Jarosław ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 03 Apr 2020
    Jan Nowak, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
    03 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Poznań, March 16th, 2020

    Dear Prof. Beaulieu,

    We are grateful for the comments that you have provided. They helped to improve our manuscript. Please find our responses below.

    Sincerely yours,

    Jan Nowak and Jarosław ... Continue reading
Views
69
Cite
Reviewer Report 12 Feb 2020
Fangqiang Wei, Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China 
Weier Wang, Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China 
Approved with Reservations
VIEWS 69
The wide spread of infection of 2019-nCoV has arouse an international concern since its original outbreak  in Wuhan, China. Scientists and health workers around the world are currently working together to wipe out the virus and the novel coronavirus pneumonia ... Continue reading
CITE
CITE
HOW TO CITE THIS REPORT
Wei F and Wang W. Reviewer Report For: Is lithium a potential treatment for the novel Wuhan (2019-nCoV) coronavirus? A scoping review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. F1000Research 2020, 9:93 (https://doi.org/10.5256/f1000research.24598.r59741)
NOTE: it is important to ensure the information in square brackets after the title is included in all citations of this article.
  • Author Response 03 Apr 2020
    Jan Nowak, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
    03 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Poznań, March 16th, 2020

    Dear Prof. Wei and Prof. Wang,

    We would like to thank you for all the comments. They helped to improve the manuscript. Please find our responses below.

    Sincerely yours,

    Jan ... Continue reading
COMMENTS ON THIS REPORT
  • Author Response 03 Apr 2020
    Jan Nowak, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
    03 Apr 2020
    Author Response
    Poznań, March 16th, 2020

    Dear Prof. Wei and Prof. Wang,

    We would like to thank you for all the comments. They helped to improve the manuscript. Please find our responses below.

    Sincerely yours,

    Jan ... Continue reading

Comments on this article Comments (6)

Version 2
VERSION 2 PUBLISHED 03 Apr 2020
Revised
Version 1
VERSION 1 PUBLISHED 07 Feb 2020
Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
  • Reader Comment 01 Apr 2020
    Miguel Buxeda MD, Miguel Buxeda MD PA, Miami Florida, USA
    01 Apr 2020
    Reader Comment
    Lithium carbonate in low  dosages of 150 or 300 mg wii be sufficient to prevent the hyperinflammatory response to 2019-NCov which results in SARS. You do not need toxic dosages. ... Continue reading
  • Author Response 27 Mar 2020
    Jan Nowak, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Metabolic Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
    27 Mar 2020
    Author Response
    Thank you for all the comments. The potential for interaction between lithium and chloroquine is discussed in the revised version of the article, which was submitted more than a week ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 23 Mar 2020
    Manteio Delphi, Forecasts Unlimited, USA
    23 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    How conveniently did this article fail to document the moderate drug interaction of QT interval prolongation between lithium and chloroquine?
    Competing Interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Reader Comment 23 Mar 2020
    Jim Meehan, Personal, UK
    23 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    As a mental health nurse in Liverpool UK I am very interested in this and hope epidemiologists and virologists are trialling it ASAP.
    We need to data crunch correlations between ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 21 Mar 2020
    Charlotte Ayley-Smith, University of Greenwich, Student, UK
    21 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    I am a Public Health BSc student and I have been undergoing Lithium therapy for 2 years now. I take 1000mgs of Priadel daily and I agree with a previous ... Continue reading
  • Reader Comment 17 Mar 2020
    Demis Cunningham, Patient, Scotland, UK
    17 Mar 2020
    Reader Comment
    As a lithium patient taking 800mg Li Carbonate I can vouch for its antiviral properties, I have not had a single cold or illness since commencing the drug for major ... Continue reading
  • Discussion is closed on this version, please comment on the latest version above.
Alongside their report, reviewers assign a status to the article:
Approved - the paper is scientifically sound in its current form and only minor, if any, improvements are suggested
Approved with reservations - A number of small changes, sometimes more significant revisions are required to address specific details and improve the papers academic merit.
Not approved - fundamental flaws in the paper seriously undermine the findings and conclusions
Sign In
If you've forgotten your password, please enter your email address below and we'll send you instructions on how to reset your password.

The email address should be the one you originally registered with F1000.

Email address not valid, please try again

You registered with F1000 via Google, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Google account password, please click here.

You registered with F1000 via Facebook, so we cannot reset your password.

To sign in, please click here.

If you still need help with your Facebook account password, please click here.

Code not correct, please try again
Email us for further assistance.
Server error, please try again.