skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

LINA - A Social Augmented Reality Game around Mental Health, Supporting Real-world Connection and Sense of Belonging for Early Adolescents

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 October 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Early adolescence is a time of major social change; a strong sense of belonging (SB) and peer connectedness is an essential protective factor in mental health (MH) during that period. In this paper we introduce LINA, an augmented reality (AR) smartphone-based serious game played in school by an entire class (age 10+) together with their teacher, which aims to facilitate and improve peer interaction, SB and class climate, while creating a safe space to reflect on MH and external stressors related to family circumstance. LINA was developed through an interdisciplinary collaboration involving a playwright, software developers, psychologists and artists, via an iterative co-development process with young people. A prototype has been evaluated quantitatively for usability and qualitatively for efficacy in a study with 91 early adolescents (agemean=11.41). Results from the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (GUESS-18) and data from qualitative focus groups showed high acceptability and preliminary efficacy of the game. Using AR, a shared immersive narrative and collaborative gameplay in a shared physical space offers an opportunity to harness adolescent affinity for digital technology towards improving real-world social connection and SB.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

v6chip242.mp4

mp4

204.8 MB

References

  1. Duane Buhrmester. 1990. Intimacy of friendship, interpersonal competence, and adjustment during preadolescence and adolescence. Child Development, 61, 4 (Aug 1990), 1101--1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--8624.1990.tb02844.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117, 3 (1995), 497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--2909.117.3.497Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. David E Barrett. 1996. The three stages of adolescence. The High School Journal, 79, 4 (1996), 333--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Julie Newman Kingery, Cynthia A Erdley and Katherine C Marshall. 2011. Peer acceptance and friendship as predictors of early adolescents' adjustment across the middle school transition. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly (1982-) (2011), 215--243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kathryn R Wentzel, Sophie Jablansky and Nicole R Scalise Do friendships afford academic benefits? A meta-analytic study. Springer, City, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanke Korpershoek, Esther Tamara Canrinus, Marjon Fokkens-Bruinsma and Hester de Boer. 2020. The relationships between school belonging and students' motivational, social-emotional, behavioural, and academic outcomes in secondary education: A meta-analytic review. Research Papers in Education, 35, 6 (2020), 641--680. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2019.1615116Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Paul E Jose, Nicholas Ryan and Jan Pryor. 2012. Does social connectedness promote a greater sense of well-being in adolescence over time? Journal of research on adolescence, 22, 2 (2012), 235--251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532--7795.2012.00783.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Marija Mitic, Kate A. Woodcock, Michaela Amering, Ina Krammer, Katharina A. M. Stiehl, Sonja Zehetmayer and Beate Schrank. 2021. Toward an Integrated Model of Supportive Peer Relationships in Early Adolescence: A Systematic Review and Exploratory Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 47 (2021-February-25 2021), https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.589403Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Ina Krammer, Beate Schrank, Isabella Pollak, Katharina Stiehl, Urs M. Nater and Kate A. Woodcock. 2022. Early adolescents' perspectives on factors that facilitate and hinder friendship with peers at the time of school transition. Journal of School Psychology (2022), in revision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Rachel Lev-Wiesel, Orit Nuttman-Shwartz and Rotem Sternberg. 2006. Peer Rejection During Adolescence: Psychological Long-Term Effects-A Brief Report Journal of Loss and Trauma, 11, 2 (2006/03/01 2006), 131--142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325020500409200Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. London and S. E. Evans-Lacko. 2010. Challenging mental health-related stigma through social contact. Eur J Public Health, 20, 2 (Apr 2010), 130--131. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Ahmed Waqas, Salma Malik, Ania Fida, Noureen Abbas, Nadeem Mian, Sannihitha Miryala, Afshan Naz Amray, Zunairah Shah and Sadiq Naveed. 2020. Interventions to Reduce Stigma Related to Mental Illnesses in Educational Institutes: a Systematic Review. Psychiatric Quarterly, 91, 3 (2020/09/01 2020), 887--903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09751--4Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Stacey K Waters, Leanne Lester, Elizabeth Wenden and Donna Cross. 2012. A theoretically grounded exploration of the social and emotional outcomes of transition to secondary school. Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 22, 2 (2012), 190--205. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.26Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Terry Ng-Knight A prospective longitudinal study of the transition to secondary school: exploring risk and protective factors. UCL (University College London), 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kathryn R Wentzel 2015. Socialization in school settings. In J. E. G. P. D. Hastings (Ed.). The Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rebecca D Taylor, Eva Oberle, Joseph A Durlak and Roger P Weissberg. 2017. Promoting positive youth development through school-based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta analysis of follow-up effects. Child Development, 88, 4 (2017), 1156--1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gloria Mittmann, Kate Woodcock, Sylvia Dörfler, Ina Krammer, Isabella Pollak and Beate Schrank. 2022. "TikTok Is My Life and Snapchat Is My Ventricle": A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of Online Communication Tools for Friendships in Early Adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42, 2 (2022), 172--203. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316211020368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Newzoo Newzoo's Generations Report: How Different Generations Engage with Games. City, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tarja Susi, Mikael Johannesson and Per Backlund. 2007. Serious games: An overview (2007),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeanine Krath, Linda Schürmann and Harald FO von Korflesch. 2021. Revealing the theoretical basis of gamification: A systematic review and analysis of theory in research on gamification, serious games and game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior (2021), 106963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106963Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. George Koutromanos, Alivisos Sofos and Lucy Avraamidou. 2016. The use of augmented reality games in education: a review of the literature. Educational Media International, 52, 4 (2016), 253--271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1125988Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Teemu Laine. 2018. Mobile Educational Augmented Reality Games: A Systematic Literature Review and Two Case Studies. Computers, 7, 1 (2018), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers7010019Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jingya Li, Erik D Van der Spek, Loe Feijs, Feng Wang and Jun Hu. 2017. Augmented reality games for learning: A literature review. International Conference on Distributed, Ambient, and Pervasive Interactions (2017), 612--626. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3--319--58697--7_46Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Birgit Schmitz, Marcus Specht and Roland Klemke. (2012). An Analysis of the Educational Potential of Augmented Reality Games for Learning. mLearn,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Nahid Sharifzadeh, Hadi Kharrazi, Elham Nazari, Hamed Tabesh, Maryam Edalati Khodabandeh, Somayeh Heidari and Mahmood Tara. 2020. Health education serious games targeting health care providers, patients, and public health users: scoping review. JMIR serious games, 8, 1 (2020), e13459. https://doi.org/10.2196/13459Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Zyda, J. Hiles, A. Mayberry, C. Wardynski, M. Capps, B. Osborn, R. Shilling, M. Robaszewski and M. Davis. 2003. Entertainment R&D for defense. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 23, 1 (Jan-Feb 2003), 28--36. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2003.1159611Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yu Zhonggen. 2019. A meta-analysis of use of serious games in education over a decade. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, 2019 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4797032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. T. M. Fleming, L. Bavin, K. Stasiak, E. Hermansson-Webb, S. N. Merry, C. Cheek, M. Lucassen, H. M. Lau, B. Pollmuller and S. Hetrick. 2016. Serious Games and Gamification for Mental Health: Current Status and Promising Directions. Front Psychiatry, 7 (2016), 215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00215Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Theresa M Fleming, Colleen Cheek, Sally N Merry, Hiran Thabrew, Heather Bridgman, Karolina Stasiak, Matthew Shepherd, Yael Perry and Sarah Hetrick. 2014. Serious games for the treatment or prevention of depression: a systematic review (2014), https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.19.num.3.2014.13904Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. D. Zayeni, J. P. Raynaud and A. Revet. 2020. Therapeutic and Preventive Use of Video Games in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry, 11 (2020), 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Inthu Balaintharanathan, Quinlan Palmer, Beatriz Franco Arellano and JoAnne Arcand. 2021. Impact of Serious Games on Nutritional Knowledge and Practices in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Cureus Journal of Medical Science (2021),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. David W McMillan. 1996. Sense of community. Journal of community psychology, 24, 4 (1996), 315--325. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520--6629(199610)24:4<315::AID-JCOP2>3.0.CO;2-TGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Ahmed Hassan, Niels Pinkwart and Muhammad Shafi. 2021. Serious games to improve social and emotional intelligence in children with autism. Entertainment computing, 38 (2021), 100417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100417Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Anne Marie Piper, Eileen O'Brien, Meredith Ringel Morris and Terry Winograd. (2006). SIDES: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, https://doi.org/10.1145/1180875.1180877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Juan Garzón, Juan Pavón and Silvia Baldiris. 2019. Systematic review and meta-analysis of augmented reality in educational settings. Virtual Reality, 23, 4 (2019), 447--459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-019-00379--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. María-Blanca Ibáñez and Carlos Delgado-Kloos. 2018. Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123 (2018), 109--123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Kamran Khowaja, Bilikis Banire, Dena Al-Thani, Mohammed Tahri Sqalli, Aboubakr Aqle, Asadullah Shah and Siti Salwah Salim. 2020. Augmented reality for learning of children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A systematic review. IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 78779--78807. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Tzung-Jin Lin, Henry Been-Lirn Duh, Nai Li, Hung-Yuan Wang and Chin-Chung Tsai. 2013. An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68 (2013), 314--321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.011Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Daniel Rapp, Jonas Müller, Kristina Bucher and Sebastian von Mammen. (2018). Pathomon: a social augmented reality serious game. 2018 10th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games), https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-Games.2018.8493437Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. M. Armstrong, C. Morris, C. Abraham and M. Tarrant. 2017. Interventions utilising contact with people with disabilities to improve children's attitudes towards disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Health J, 10, 1 (Jan 2017), 11--22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Andreas Beelmann and Kim Sarah Heinemann. 2014. Preventing prejudice and improving intergroup attitudes: A meta-analysis of child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35, 1 (2014), 10--24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Soojung Chae, Eun-Young Park and Mikyung Shin. 2018. School-based Interventions for Improving Disability Awareness and Attitudes Towards Disability of Students Without Disabilities: A Meta-analysis. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 66, 4 (2018), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2018.1439572Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. P. W. Corrigan, S. Morris, P. Michaels, J. Rafacz and N. Rüsch 2012. Challenging the public stigma of mental illness: A meta-analysis of outcome studies. In.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomas F. Pettigrew and Linda R. Tropp. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of personality and social psychology, 90, 5 (2006/05// 2006), 751--783. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022--3514.90.5.751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Thomas F. Pettigrew and Linda R. Tropp. 2008. How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 6 (2008), 922--934. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.504Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. V. Pinfold, H. Toulmin, G. Thornicroft, P. Huxley, P. Farmer and T. Graham. 2003. Reducing psychiatric stigma and discrimination: evaluation of educational interventions in UK secondary schools. Br J Psychiatry, 182 (Apr 2003), 342--346. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.182.4.342Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. G. Allport 1954. The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Oxford, England.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Gian Antonio Di Bernardo, Loris Vezzali, Sofia Stathi, Alessia Cadamuro and Lisa Cortesi. 2017. Vicarious, extended and imagined intergroup contact: A review of interventions based on indirect contact strategies applied in educational settings. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology (2017),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Daisy Fancourt and Saoirse Finn 2019. What is the evidence on the role of the arts in improving health and well-being? A scoping review. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Hod Orkibi and Rinat Feniger-Schaal. 2019. Integrative systematic review of psychodrama psychotherapy research: Trends and methodological implications. PloS one, 14, 2 (2019), e0212575. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Young-Ja Jeong, Sung-Chan Hong, Myeong Soo Lee, Min-Cheol Park, Yong-Kyu Kim and Chae-Moon Suh. 2005. Dance movement therapy improves emotional responses and modulates neurohormones in adolescents with mild depression. International journal of neuroscience, 115, 12 (2005), 1711--1720. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450590958574Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Lindsey Cameron and Adam Rutland 2006. Extended Contact through Story Reading in School: Reducing Children's Prejudice toward the Disabled.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Lindsey Cameron, Adam Rutland, Rebecca Douch and Rupert Brown. 2006. Changing Children's Intergroup Attitudes toward Refugees: Testing Different Models of Extended Contact. Child Development, 77, 5 (Sep-Oct 2006), 1208--1219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467--8624.2006.00929.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Joseph R Keebler, William J Shelstad, Dustin C Smith, Barbara S Chaparro and Mikki H Phan. 2020. Validation of the GUESS-18: A Short Version of the Game User Experience Satisfaction Scale (GUESS). Journal of Usability Studies, 16, 1 (2020),Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. IBM Corp. 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. IBM Corp, Armonk, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Statista Gender distribution of gamers worldwide Q4 2020, by device. J Clement, City, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. LINA - A Social Augmented Reality Game around Mental Health, Supporting Real-world Connection and Sense of Belonging for Early Adolescents

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader