Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Temporary leadless pacing in a patient with severe device infection
  1. Alexander Kypta1,
  2. Hermann Blessberger2,
  3. Michael Lichtenauer3,
  4. Clemens Steinwender2
  1. 1Cardiovascular Division, Linz General Hospital Johannes Kepler University School of Medicine, Linz, Austria
  2. 2Linz General Hospital Johannes Kepler University School of Medicine, Linz, Austria
  3. 3Clinic of Internal Medicine II, Paracelsus Medical University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
  1. Correspondence to Dr Alexander Kypta, alexander.kypta{at}gmail.com

Summary

A 64-year-old patient underwent implantation of a transcatheter pacing systems (TPS) for severe lead endocarditis. The patient experienced fever after a dental procedure. On the transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), vegetations were attached to the leads. Because the patient was pacemaker dependent, a temporary pacing lead had to be placed. After removal, however, he did not improve. A second TEE showed new vegetations. Ventricular fibrillation occurred spontaneously; so isoprenalin had to be stopped and a new lead was implanted. Vegetations appeared soon after the new temporary lead was placed. We used a TPS as a bridging device, followed by implantation of a resynchronisation system, and explantation of the TPS. After the Micra TPS was implanted, the patient recovered noticeably. All inflammation parameters were negative and an additional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT imaging also proved to be negative. So a CRT-D device was then implanted, and the TCP was removed.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.