Abstract
Objective
The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in treating elderly patients with atopic dermatitis from baseline to 52 weeks.
Methods
A retrospective observational real-life study was conducted in a group of elderly patients with severe atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab for 52 weeks. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 65 years; diagnosis of atopic dermatitis made by an expert dermatologist; Eczema Area and Severity Index ≥ 24; and a contraindication, side effects, or failure to respond to cyclosporine. The primary outcome was the mean percentage reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline to week 52. Secondary measures included the mean percentage reduction in the Pruritus and Sleep Numerical Rating Scales and the Dermatology Life Quality Index, and the types and rates of adverse events from baseline to week 52.
Results
One hundred and five patients were eligible for the study. Flexural dermatitis was the most frequent clinical phenotype (63.8%). The coexistence of more than one clinical phenotype was found in 70/105 (66.6%) patients. We observed a reduction in all disease severity scores from baseline to week 52 (p < 0.001). Adverse events were recorded in 30/105 (28.6%) patients, with conjunctivitis and injection-site reaction the most frequent.
Conclusions
In this study, dupilumab is an effective and safe treatment for the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in patients aged over 65 years.
References
Blauvelt A, de Bruin-Weller M, Gooderham M, et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389:2287–303.
Worm M, Simpson EL, Thaçi D, et al. Efficacy and safety of multiple dupilumab dose regimens after initial successful treatment in patients with atopic dermatitis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:131–43.
Armario-Hita JC, Pereyra-Rodriguez J, Silvestre JF, et al. Treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab in real clinical practice: a multicentre, retrospective case series. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181:1072–4.
Ruiz-Villaverde R, Dominguez-Cruz J, Armario-Hita JC, Martinez-Pilar L, Alcantara-Luna S, Pereyra- Rodriguez JJ. Fifty-two week follow-up safety and effectiveness results of dupilumab treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from a retrospective, multicentric series. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32:e12931.
Jo CE, Georgakopoulos JR, Ladda M, et al. Evaluation of long-term efficacy, safety, and reasons for discontinuation of dupilumab for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82:1530–2.
Fargnoli MC, Esposito M, Ferrucci S, Dupilumab Italian National Access Program (Dup-INAP Group), et al. Real-life experience on effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019;28:1–7.
Fargnoli MC, Esposito M, Ferrucci S, et al. A 48-week update of a multicentre real-life experience of dupilumab in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;3:1–4.
Nettis E, Fabbrocini G, Ortoncelli M, et al. Long-term effectiveness of dupilumab up to 52 weeks in atopic dermatitis in 253 adult patients. Br J Dermatol. 2020 (epub ahead of print).
Napolitano M, Fabbrocini G, Scalvenzi M, Blasio C, Stingeni L, Patruno C. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in atopic dermatitis in elderly patients: a retrospective study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020;45:888–90.
Patruno C, Napolitano M, Argenziano G, Peris K, Ortoncelli M, Girolomoni G, et al. Dupilumab therapy of atopic dermatitis of the elderly: a multi-centre, real-life study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 (epub ahead of print).
Acknowledgements
DADE Study Group Collaborators: Angileri L, Bianchelli T, Borghi A, Calabrese G, Chello C, Dal Bello G, Dastoli S, Ferrillo M, Galluzzo M, Gori N, Hansel K, Macchia L, Piras V, Provenzano E, Ribero S, Romanelli M, Romita P.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No funding or sponsorship was received for the conduct of this study or the preparation of this article.
Conflict of interest
Cataldo Patruno acted as investigator, speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi. Gabriella Fabbrocini has been the principal investigator in clinical trials sponsored by and/or and has received personal fees from AbbVie, Abiogen, Almirall, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Sanofi, and UCB. Silvia Mariel Ferrucci is a speaker for Novartis and Sanofi Genzyme, is a principal investigator for Eli Lilly, AbbVie, and Sanofi Genzyme, and is an advisory member of Sanofi Genzyme. Luca Stingeni acted as a speaker and board member for Sanofi-Genzyme. Ketty Peris reports grants and personal fees from Almirall and AbbVie, and personal fees from Biogen, Lilly, Celgene, Galderma, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sandoz, Sun Pharma, and Janssen, outside the submitted work; Michela Ortoncelli acted as a speaker for AbbVie, Novartis, and Sanofi. Annamaria Offidani acted as an advisory board member, investigator, and speaker for AbbVie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and Sanofi Genzyme. Giampiero Girolomoni has been a principal investigator in clinical trials sponsored by and/or and has received personal fees from AbbVie, Abiogen, Almirall, Alphasights, Amgen, Biogen, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli-Lilly, Genzyme Gerson Lehrman Group, Guidepoint Global, Leo Pharma, Menlo Therapeutics, Novartis, OM Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, and UCB. Eustachio Nettis in the past 5 years accepted a fee for organizing education for Sanofi. Caterina Foti acted as a speaker for AbbVie, Novartis, and Sanofi. Franco Rongioletti acted as a board advisor member for Sanofi. Maddalena Napolitano acted as a speaker, consultant, and advisory board member for Sanofi, Abbvie, Leo Pharma, and Novartis. Giuseppe Longo, Giuseppe Argenziano, Giuseppe Fabrizio Amoruso, Marina Talamonti, Teresa Grieco, Michela Iannone, Monica Corazza, and Michele Delli Veneri have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.
Ethics approval
The Ethics Committee of University of Naples Federico II (Naples, Italy) approved this study (Approval no. CE 116/20).
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants involved in the study.
Consent for publication
Consent for publication was obtained from both all individual participants and authors involved in the study.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author contributions
CP, GF, and MN designed the study; GA, SF, LS, KP, MO, AO, GFA, MT, TG, MI, FR, and MC contributed to implementation of the research; GL and MDV contributed to the analysis of the results; and CP and MN wrote the manuscript in consultation with GF, GG, and EN.
Additional information
The members of DADE Study Group Collaborators are listed in the Acknowledgements section.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patruno, C., Fabbrocini, G., Longo, G. et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Long-Term Dupilumab Treatment in Elderly Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Multicenter Real-Life Observational Study. Am J Clin Dermatol 22, 581–586 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00597-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-021-00597-5