Abstract
Objective
The carbon-14 (14C) urea breath test (UBT) is a reliable and noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. The diagnostic performance of a new practical and low dose 14C UBT system (Heliprobe, Stockholm, Sweden) was compared with those of other diagnostic tests, namely, rapid urease test (RUT), histopathology, and DNA detection using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
Methods
Eighty-nine patients (mean age = 45 ± 13, 30 men) with dyspeptic complaints who underwent an endoscopic procedure were studied. Biopsy specimens acquired during the procedure were subjected to RUT, histopathological examination using hematoxylin and eosin (HP-HE) and PCR. All patients underwent UBT using the Heliprobe system on a different day. The gold standard for HP positivity was defined as any two of the three tests being positive, excluding UBT, and the sensitivity and specificity of any single test alone were determined using this gold standard. Whenever only one test was positive, it was considered to be a false-positive one.
Results
With the gold standard used in this study, 59 (66%) patients were diagnosed HP positive. The Heliprobe method detected HP infection with 96.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity and had the best diagnostic performance when compared with all the other methods. The sensitivity and specificity of the other methods for the detection of HP positivity were 89.8% and 100% for RUT, 93.2% and 63.3% for PCR, and 93.2% and 76.6% for HP-HE, respectively. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic were 0.977 for UBT, 0.947 for RUT, 0.84 for HP-HE, and 0.775 for PCR.
Conclusions
Using a combination of invasive diagnostic tests as the gold standard, Heliprobe UBT was found to be highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of HP infection in patients with dyspeptic complaints.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matysiak-Budnik T, Laszewicz W, Lamarque D, Chaussade S. Helicobacter and non-malignant disease. Helicobacter 2006;11:27–31.
Staryznska T, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter and digestive malignancies. Helicobacter 2006;11:32–35.
Wong BC, Ching CK, Lam SK. Helicobacter pylori infection and gastric cancer. Hong Kong Med J 1999;5:175–179.
Covacci A, Telford JL, Giudice GD, Parsonnet J, Rappuoli R. Helicobacter pylori virulence and genetic geography. Science 1999;284:1328–1333.
Hansson LE, Nyren O, Hsing AW, Bergström R, Josefsson S, Chow WH, et al. The risk of stomach cancer in patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer disease. N Engl J Med 1996;335:242–249.
Bohr U, Annibale B, Fransechi F, Raccarina D, Gasbarrini A. Extragastric manifestations of Helicobacter pylori infection: other Helicobacters. Helicobacter 2007;12:45–53.
Dunn BD, Hartley C, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter pylori. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:720–741.
Hegedus O, Ryden J, Rehnberg A, Nilsson S, Hellström P. Validated accuracy of a novel urea breath test for rapid Helicobacter pylori detection and in-office analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:1–8.
Wittwer CT, Ririe KM, Andrew RV, David DA, Gundry RA, Balis UJ. The LightcyclerTM: a microvolume multisample fluorimeter with rapid temperature control. Biotechniques 1997;22:176–181.
Me’nard A, Santos A, Me’graud F, Oleastro M. PCR-RFLP can also detect the point mutation A2142C of the 23S rRNA gene associated with resistance of Helicobacter pylori to clarithromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002;46:1156–1157.
Laine L, Estrada R, Trujillo M, Knigge K, Fennerty MB. Effect of proton pump inhibitor therapy on diagnostic testing for Helicobacter pylori. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:547–550.
Thijs JC, van Zwet AA, Thijs WJ, Oey HB, Karrenbeld A, Stellaard F, et al. Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: a prospective evaluation of their accuracy, without selecting a single test as the gold standard. Am J Gastroenterol 1996;91:2125–2129.
Adachi K, Kawamura A, Ono M, Masukazi K, Takashima T, Yuki M, et al. Comparative evaluation of urine based and other minimal invasive methods for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. J Gastroenterol 2002;37:703–708.
Andersen LP, Kiilerick S, Pedersen G, Thoreson AC, Jorgensen F, Rath J, et al. An analysis of seven different methods to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infections. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33:24–30.
Lerang F, Moum B, Mowinckel P, Haug J, Ragnhildstveit E, Berge T, et al. Accuracy of seven different tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and the impact of H2-receptor antagonists on test results. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33:364–369.
Munteiro L, de Mascarel A, Sarrasqueta AM, Bergey B, Barberis C, Talby P, et al. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: noninvasive methods compared to invasive methods and evaluation of two new tests. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:353–358.
Öztürk E, Yeşilova Z, Ilgan S, Arslan N, Erdil A, Celasun B, et al. A new practical, low dose 14C urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: clinical validation and comparison with the standard method. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30:1457–1462.
Chey WD, Woods M, Scheiman JM, Nostrant TT, DelValle J. Lansoprazole and ranitidine affect the accuracy of the 14C-urea breath test by a pH dependent mechanism. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:446–450.
Savarino V, Tracci D, Dulbecco P, Mele MR, Zentilin P, Mansi C, et al. Negative effect of ranitidine on the results of urea breath test for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:348–352.
Stubbs JB, Marshall BJ. Radiation dose estimates for the carbon-14 labeled urea breath test. J Nucl Med 1993;34:821–825.
Hirschl A, Makristathis A. Methods to detect Helicobacter pylori: from culture to molecular biology. Helicobacter 2007;12:6–11.
Holton J. Clinical relevance of culture: why, how and when. Helicobacter 1997;2:25–33.
Nedenskov-Sorenson P, Aase S, Bjorkneklett A, Fausa O, Bukholm G. Sampling efficiency in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection and chronic active gastritis. J Clin Microbiol 1991;20:672–675.
Andersen LP, Holck S, Povlsen CO. Campylobacter pylori detected by indirect immunohistochemical technique. Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand 1988;96:559–564.
Clayton CI, Kleanthous H, Coates PJ, Morgan DD, Tabaqchali S. Sensitive detection of Helicobacter pylori by using poly-merase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:192–200.
Fabre R, Sobhani I, Laurent-Puig P, Hedef N, Yazigi N, Vissuzaine C, et al. Polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens: comparison with culture, rapid urease test and histopathological test. Gut 1994;35:905–908.
Hammar M, Tyszkiewicz T, Wadström T, O’Toole PW. Rapid detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy material by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1992;30:54–58.
Roosendaal R, Kuipers EJ, Van den Brule AJ, Pena AS, Uyterlinde AM, Walboomers JM, et al. Importance of fiberoptic endoscope cleaning procedure for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 1994;32:1123–1126.
Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O’Morain C, Bazzoli F, El-Omar E, Graham D, et al. Current concepts in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: the Maastricht III Consensus Report. Gut 2007;56:772–781.
Howden CW, Hunt RH. Guidelines for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:2330–2338.
Meurer LN, Bower DJ. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am Fam Physician 2002;65:1327–1336.
Rubin G, Meineche-Schmidt V, Roberts A, Childs S, de Wit N. The management of H. pylori infection in primary care: guidelines from ESPCG. Eur J Clin Pract 1999;5:98–104.
Talley JN, Vakil N, the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the management of dyspepsia. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:2324–2337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Özdemir, E., Karabacak, N.I., Deḡertekin, B. et al. Could the simplified 14C urea breath test be a new standard in noninvasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection?. Ann Nucl Med 22, 611–616 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0168-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-008-0168-6