Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Critical Exploration of Migraine as a Health Disparity: the Imperative of an Equity-Oriented, Intersectional Approach

  • Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Headache and Pain (D Buse, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Despite recognition of rising prevalence and significant burden, migraine remains underestimated, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. This is especially true among groups who have been historically, socially, and economically marginalized such as communities of color, women, people experiencing poverty, people with lower levels of education, and people who hold more than one of these marginalized identities. While there is growing public and professional interest in disparities in migraine prevalence, there is a paucity of research focusing on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, and the social and structural determinants of health and equity that perpetuate these disparities. From a health equity perspective, migraine research and treatment require an examination not only of biological and behavioral factors, but of these identities and underlying, intersecting social and structural determinants of health.

Recent Findings

Significant disparities in migraine incidence, prevalence, migraine-related pain and disability, access to care, and quality of care persist among marginalized and underserved groups: African Americans, Hispanics, people experiencing poverty, un- or under-employment, the un- and under-insured, people who have been exposed to stressful and traumatic events across the lifespan, and people experiencing multiple, overlapping marginalized identities. These same groups are largely underrepresented in migraine research, despite bearing disproportionate burden. Current approaches to understanding health disparities in migraine largely assume an essentializing approach, i.e., documenting differences between single identity groups—e.g., race or income or education level—rather than considering the mechanisms of disparities: the social and structural determinants of health.

Summary

While disparities in migraine are becoming more widely acknowledged, we assert that migraine is more aptly understood as a health equity issue, that is, a condition in which many of the health disparities are avoidable. It is important in research and clinical practice to consider perspectives that incorporate a cultural understanding of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic identity within and across all levels of society. Incorporating perspectives of intersectionality provides a strong foundation for understanding the role of these complex combination of factors on migraine pain and treatment. We urge the adoption of intersectional and systems perspectives in research, clinical practice, and policy to examine (1) interplay of race, gender, and social location as key factors in understanding, diagnosing, and treating migraine, and (2) the complex configurations of social and structural determinants of health that interact to produce health inequities in migraine care. An intentional research and clinical focus on these factors stands to improve how migraine is identified, documented, and treated among marginalized populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Braveman, P.A., et al., Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice. Am J Public Health, 2011. 101 Suppl 1: p. S149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Levy B, Sidel V. The nature of social injustice and its impact on public health. In: Levy B, Sidel V, editors. Social Injustice and Public Health. New York: Oxford; 2013. p. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gruskin B. Defining equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(4):254–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raphael D. The importance of tackling health inequalities. In: Raphael D, editor. Tackling Health Inequalities: Lessons from International Experiences. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press; 2012. p. 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Health Equity and Disparities. 2011; Available from: http://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov/npa/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=1&lvlid=34.

  6. American Public Health Association. Health equity. 2015; Available from: https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/health-equity.

  7. Gostin LO, Powers M. What does social justice require for the public's health? Public health ethics and policy imperatives. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25(4):1053–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. World Health Organization. Metrics: disability-adjusted life year. 2015; Available from: http://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/metrics_daly/en/.

  9. Steiner TJ, et al. Headache disorders are third cause of disability worldwide. J Headache Pain. 2015;16:58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stovner L, Hagen K, Jensen R, Katsarava Z, Lipton RB, Scher AI, et al. The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(3):193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization, Atlas of headache disorders and resources in the world 2011. 2011.

  12. Woldeamanuel YW, Cowan RP. Migraine affects 1 in 10 people worldwide featuring recent rise: a systematic review and meta-analysis of community-based studies involving 6 million participants. J Neurol Sci. 2017;372:307–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Burch R, Rizzoli P, Loder E. The prevalence and impact of migraine and severe headache in the United States: figures and trends from government health studies. Headache. 2018;58(4):496–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buse DC, Rupnow MFT, Lipton RB. Assessing and managing all aspects of migraine: migraine attacks, migraine-related functional impairment, common comorbidities, and quality of life. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(5):422–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Loder S, Sheikh HU, Loder E. The prevalence, burden, and treatment of severe, frequent, and migraine headaches in US minority populations: statistics from National Survey studies. Headache. 2015;55(2):214–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. • Charleston L IV, et al. Migraine care challenges and strategies in US uninsured and underinsured adults: a narrative review, part 1. Headache. 2018;58(4):506–11 This excellent review presents migraine health disparities within the context of social and structural determinants of health.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stewart WF, Roy J, Lipton RB. Migraine prevalence, socioeconomic status, and social causation. Neurology. 2013;81(11):948–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crenshaw, K., Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, Fem Theory, and antiracist politics [1989], in Feminist legal theory. 2018, Routledge. p. 57–80.

  19. Dill, B.T. and M.B. Zinn, Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism, in race, gender and class. 2016, Routledge. P. 76–82.

  20. Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford law Rev. 1991;43:1241–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Heckman B, Holroyd KA, Tietjen G, O'Donnell FJ, Himawan L, Utley C, et al. Whites and African-Americans in headache specialty clinics respond equally well to treatment. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(6):650–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. • Kempner J. Not tonight: migraine and the politics of gender and health. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014. This thoroughly-researched book is a very good exemplar for examining the multidimensional, intersecting social, medical, and structural processes that construct and perpetuate cultural assumptions and understanding of migraine, and how those assumptions beget inequitable outcomes.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Chronic Pain Research Alliance, Chronic pain in women: neglect, dismissal, and discrimination. 2010.

  24. Goldenberg MJ. On evidence and evidence-based medicine: lessons from the philosophy of science. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(11):2621–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kempner J. Gendering the migraine market: do representations of illness matter? Soc Sci Med. 2006;63(8):1986–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M, Freitag F, Reed ML, Stewart WF, et al. Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology. 2007;68(5):343–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Caiola C, Barroso J, Docherty SL. Capturing the social location of African American mothers living with HIV: an inquiry into how social determinants of health are framed. Nurs Res. 2017;66(3):209–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Borsook D, Maleki N, Becerra L, McEwen B. Understanding migraine through the lens of maladaptive stress responses: a model disease of allostatic load. Neuron. 2012;73(2):219–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Atasoy HT, Unal AE, Atasoy N, Emre U, Sumer M. Low income and education levels may cause medication overuse and chronicity in migraine patients. Headache. 2005;45(1):25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu J, Noxon V, Lu ZK. Patterns of use and health expenses associated with triptans among adults with migraines. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(8):673–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Brennenstuhl S, Fuller-Thomson E. The painful legacy of childhood violence: migraine headaches among adult survivors of adverse childhood experiences. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2015;55(7):973–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Anda R, Tietjen G, Schulman E, Felitti V, Croft J. Adverse childhood experiences and frequent headaches in adults. Headache. 2010;50(9):1473–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tietjen G, Buse D, Fanning K, Serrano D, Reed M, Lipton R. Recalled maltreatment, migraine, and tension-type headache results of the AMPP study. Neurology. 2015;84(2):132–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dooley JM, Gordon KE, Kuhle S. Food insecurity and migraine in Canada. Cephalalgia. 2016;36(10):936–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Goadsby PJ. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. 2012;15(Suppl 1):S15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Charles A. The evolution of a migraine attack - a review of recent evidence. Headache. 2013;53(2):413–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Loder E, Burch R, Rizzoli P. The 2012 AHS/AAN guidelines for prevention of episodic migraine: a summary and comparison with other recent clinical practice guidelines. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2012;52(6):930–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Marmura MJ, Silberstein SD, Schwedt TJ. The acute treatment of migraine in adults: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of migraine pharmacotherapies. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2015;55(1):3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Orr SL, Friedman BW, Christie S, Minen MT, Bamford C, Kelley NE, et al. Management of adults with acute migraine in the emergency department: the American Headache Society evidence assessment of parenteral pharmacotherapies. Headache. 2016;56(6):911–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA. Pathophysiology of migraine. Annual review of physiology. 2013;75:365–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. National Institutes of Health. Estimates of funding for various research, condition, and disease category (RCDC). 2016 [cited 2017 May 11]; Available from: https://report.nih.gov/categorical_spending.aspx.

  42. National Institute of Mental Health. US Leading Categories of Disease/Disorders. 2013 [cited 2017 May 11]; Available from: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/disability/us-leading-categories-of-diseases-disorders.shtml.

  43. Buse DC, et al. Sex differences in the prevalence, symptoms, and associated features of migraine, probable migraine and other severe headache: results of the American migraine prevalence and prevention (AMPP) study. Headache. 2013;53(8):1278–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Diamond S, Bigal ME, Silberstein S, Loder E, Reed M, Lipton RB. Patterns of diagnosis and acute and preventive treatment for migraine in the United States: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention study. Headache. 2007;47(3):355–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Becker WJ, Findlay T, Moga C, Scott NA, Harstall C, Taenzer P. Guideline for primary care management of headache in adults. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61(8):670–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Schafer AM, Rains JC, Penzien DB, Groban L, Smitherman TA, Houle TT. Direct costs of preventive headache treatments: comparison of behavioral and pharmacologic approaches. Headache. 2011;51(6):985–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Burch RC, et al. The prevalence and burden of migraine and severe headache in the United States: updated statistics from government health surveillance studies. Headache. 2015;55(1):21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lipton RB, Serrano D, Holland S, Fanning KM, Reed ML, Buse DC. Barriers to the diagnosis and treatment of migraine: effects of sex, income, and headache features. Headache. 2013;53(1):81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ahnquist J, Wamala SP, Lindstrom M. Social determinants of health – a question of social or economic capital? Interaction effects of socioeconomic factors on health outcomes. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74(6):930–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, Houweling TAJ, Taylor S. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372(9650):1661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. McCall L. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2005;30(3):1771–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Nash JC. Re-thinking intersectionality. Fem Rev. 2008;89(1):1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Delgado R. Rodrigo’s reconsideration: intersectionality and the future of critical race theory. Iowa Law Review. 2011;96(4):1247–88.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Matsuda MJ, et al. Words that wound. Westview: Boulder, CO; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Graham L, Brown-Jeffy S, Aronson R, Stephens C. Critical race theory as theoretical framework and analysis tool for population health research. Crit Public Health. 2011;21(1):81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ladson-Billings, G., & Donnor, J. K. , Waiting for the call: the moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship., in Handbook of Critical and Indigenous Methodologies, N. Denzin, Lincoln, Y., & Smith, L.T., Editor. 2008, Sage. p. 61–84.

  57. Frerichs L, et al. Integrating systems science and community-based participatory research to achieve health equity. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(2):215–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Addison CC, et al. Building collaborative health promotion partnerships: the Jackson heart study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;13(1):25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Using community-based participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7(3):312–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Cook J, Michener JL, Lyn M, Lobach D, Johnson F. Community collaboration to improve care and reduce health disparities. Health Aff. 2010;29(5):956–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Greenhalgh T, et al. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Q. 2016;94(2):392–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. SAMSHA-HRSA for Integrated Health Solutions. Trauma. n.d. [cited 2017 December 4]; Available from: https://www.integration.samhsa.gov/clinical-practice/trauma.

  64. •• Browne AJ, et al. EQUIP healthcare: an overview of a multi-component intervention to enhance equity-oriented care in primary health care settings. Int J Equity Health. 2015;14(1):152 Comprehensive overview of an equity-oriented approach to care, including training on and incorporating trauma- and violence-informed care and the social determinants of health, applicable to diverse practice environments.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Farmer PE, Nizeye B, Stulac S, Keshavjee S. Structural violence and clinical medicine. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Leitch L. Action steps using ACEs and trauma-informed care: a resilience model. Health & justice. 2017;5(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Trauma-informed approach and trauma-specific interventions. 2015 [cited 2018 April 25]; Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/nctic/trauma-interventions.

  68. EQUIP Health Care. Trauma-and-violence-informed care (TVIC): a tool for health and social service organizations and providers. 2017 [cited 2018; Available from: http://www.equiphealthcare.ca/.

  69. Machtinger EL, Cuca YP, Khanna N, Rose CD, Kimberg LS. From treatment to healing: the promise of trauma-informed primary care. Womens Health Issues. 2015;25(3):193–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. EQUIP Health Care. Top 10 things your clinic, practice, or department can do to create a welcoming environment. 2017 [cited 2018; Available from: Retrieved from http://www.equiphealthcare.ca/.

  71. Norman RE, Byambaa M, de R, Butchart A, Scott J, Vos T. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. National Association of Community Health Centers. PRAPARE. 2018 [cited 2018 April 25]; Available from: http://www.nachc.org/research-and-data/prapare/.

  73. Watt RG. From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Campbell, J., Penzien, D., Wall, E. , Evidence based guidelines for migraine headaches: behavioral and physical treatments. . 2000, US Headache Consortium.

  75. Rains JC, et al. Behavioral headache treatment: history, review of the empirical literature, and methodological critique. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2005;45(s2).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Sullivan A, Cousins S, Ridsdale L. Psychological interventions for migraine: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2016;263(12):2369–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Smitherman TA, et al. In: Wedding LBD, Freedland K, Sobell L, Wolfe D, editors. Headache. Advances in psychotherapy: evidence-based practice. Boston: Hogrefe; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Walker RJ, Gebregziabher M, Martin-Harris B, Egede LE. Independent effects of socioeconomic and psychological social determinants of health on self-care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014;36(6):662–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Shawn Kneipp, Dr. Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Dr. Janet Bettger, and Dr. Janice Humphreys for their thoughtful and insightful contributions to the development of concepts in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Deanna R. Befus & Remy R. Coeytaux

  2. Program in Community Engagement, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Megan Bennett Irby

  3. Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Donald B Penzien

Authors
  1. Deanna R. Befus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Megan Bennett Irby
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Remy R. Coeytaux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donald B Penzien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deanna R. Befus.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Deanna R. Befus, Megan Bennett Irby, Remy R. Coeytaux, and Donald B Penzien declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Psychological and Behavioral Aspects of Headache and Pain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Befus, D.R., Irby, M.B., Coeytaux, R.R. et al. A Critical Exploration of Migraine as a Health Disparity: the Imperative of an Equity-Oriented, Intersectional Approach. Curr Pain Headache Rep 22, 79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0731-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-018-0731-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation