Abstract
In this review, we would like to illustrate our experience with the da Vinci® Xi system in case of esophageal surgery. Since the da Vinci® Xi system was installed in our department, it has resulted in a great improvement in cases of minimally invasive surgery. After the successful establishment in the field of colorectal surgery, the next step was surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Due to the features of the robotic system, we can definitely observe the advantages and a positive effect in case of minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE). We have also tried to develop an adequate surgical standard of the robotic-assisted minimal invasive esophagectomy with the da Vinci® Xi.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Collard J-M, Lengele B, Otte J-B, Kestens P-J (1993) En Bloc and standard esophagectomies by thoracoscopy. Ann Thorac Surg 56:675–679
Melvin WS, Needleman BJ, Krause KR, Schneider C, Wolf RK, Michler RE, Ellison EC (2002) Computer-enhanced robotic telesurgery. Initial experience in foregut surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1790–1792
Brett Broussard J, Evans B, Wei (2016) Robert Cerfolio. Robotic esophagectomy. J Vis Surg 2:139
Straughan DM, Azoury SC, Bennett RD, Pimiento JM, Fontaine JP, Toloza EM (2015) Robotic-assisted esophageal surgery. Cancer Control 22(3):335–339
Puntambekar SP, Rayate N, Joshi S, Agarwal G (2011) Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in the prone position: experience with 32 patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142(5):1283–1284
Yibulayin W, Abulizi S, Lv H, Sun W (2016) Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 14:304
Bae SU, Baek SJ, Hur H, Baik SH, Kim NK, Min BS (2013) Intraoperative near infrared fluorescence imaging in robotic low anterior resection: three case reports. Yonsei Med J 54(4):1066–1069
Gallagher AG, McClure N, McGuigan J, Ritchie K, Sheehy NP (1998) An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills. Endoscopy 30(7):617–620
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:1
Kayani B, Garas G, Arshad M, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Zacharakis E (2014) Is hand-sewn anastomosis superior to stapled anastomosis following oesophagectomy? Int J Surg 12(1):7–15
Castro PMV, Ribeiro FPG, Rocha ADF, Mazzurana M, Alvarez GA (2014) Hand-sewn versus stapler esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal ressection: sistematic review and meta-analysis. Arq Bras Cir Dig 27(3):216–221
van Hillegersberg R, Seesing MFJ, Brenkman HJF, Ruurda JP (2017) Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. Der Chirurg 88(Supplement 1):7–11
He H, Wu Q, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Chen N, Fu J, Zhang G (2018) Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. J Cardiothor Surg 13:52
van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, Verhage RJJ, van der Horst S, Haverkamp L, Siersema PD, Borel Rinkes IHM, van Hillegersberg R (2015) Oncologic long-term results of robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1350–1356
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author A. Pötscher, C. Bittermann, and F. Längle declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pötscher, A., Bittermann, C. & Längle, F. Robot-assisted esophageal surgery using the da Vinci® Xi system: operative technique and initial experiences. J Robotic Surg 13, 469–474 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0872-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0872-8