Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Elder Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in patients aged 60 years old or older.

Methods

The available literature was searched for eligible studies up to November 2019. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

This meta-analysis involved nineteen studies. The rates of early and late complications in RYGB were much higher than those in SG. More specifically, within 30 days after surgeries, leak, urinary tract infection, obstruction, and death occurred more often in the RYGB group. The above differences may lead to higher rates of hospital readmission and return to the operating room. RYGB was superior to SG in terms of remission of hypertension and the 1-year follow-up weight loss outcome, while there were no differences in terms of remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as well as weight loss outcomes during 2- and 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions

SG was the preferable option to RYGB for patients aged 60 years old or older, as SG has been shown not inferior to RYGB in terms of effectiveness, while being safer than RYGB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mathus-Vliegen EM. Obesity and the elderly. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46(7):533–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Osher E, Stern N. Obesity in elderly subjects: in sheep’s clothing perhaps, but still a wolf! Diabetes Care. 2009;32(suppl_2):S398–402.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharples AJ, Mahawar K. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing long-term outcomes of Roux-En-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2019;30(2):664–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Osland E, Yunus RM, Khan S, et al. Postoperative early major and minor complications in laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2273–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang Y, Song YH, Chen J, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy for super super obese and super obese: systematic review and meta-analysis of weight results, comorbidity resolution. Obes Surg. 2019;29(6):1954–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang X, Liu T, Zhong M, et al. Predictors of glycemic control after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a meta-analysis, meta-regression, and systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(12):1822–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Z, Sun J, Li R, et al. A comprehensive comparison of LRYGB and LSG in obese patients including the effects on QoL, comorbidities, weight loss, and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):819–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Qin C, Luo B, Aggarwal A, et al. Advanced age as an independent predictor of perioperative risk after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Obes Surg. 2015;25(3):406–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pechman DM, Muñoz Flores F, Kinkhabwala CM, et al. Bariatric surgery in the elderly: outcomes analysis of patients over 70 using the ACS-NSQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(11):1923–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Casillas RA, Kim B, Fischer H, et al. Comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for weight loss and safety outcomes in older adults. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(9):1476–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Elbahrawy A, Bougie A, Loiselle SE, et al. Medium to long-term outcomes of bariatric surgery in older adults with super obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(4):470–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Goldberg I, Yang J, Nie L, et al. Safety of bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(8):1380–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Prasad J, Vogels E, Dove JT, et al. Is age a real or perceived discriminator for bariatric surgery? A long-term analysis of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(5):725–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith ME, Bacal D, Bonham AJ, et al. Perioperative and 1-year outcomes of bariatric surgery in septuagenarians: implications for patient selection. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(10):1805–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vinan-Vega M, Diaz Vico T, Elli EF. Bariatric surgery in the elderly patient: safety and short-time outcome. A case match analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):1007–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon J, Sherman J, Argiroff A, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass for the aging population. Obes Surg. 2016;26(11):2611–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daigle CR, Andalib A, Corcelles R, et al. Bariatric and metabolic outcomes in the super-obese elderly. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(1):132–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gray KD, Moore MD, Bellorin O, et al. Increased metabolic benefit for obese, elderly patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;28(3):636–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hazzan D, Chin EH, Steinhagen E, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery can be safe for treatment of morbid obesity in patients older than 60 years. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2(6):613–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramirez A, Roy M, Hidalgo JE, et al. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients >70 years old. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(4):458–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ritz P, Topart P, Benchetrit S, et al. Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in patients aged more than 60 years. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;14:4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gebhart A, Young MT, Nguyen NT. Bariatric surgery in the elderly: 2009-2013. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(2):393–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arnold MR, Schlosser KA, Otero J, et al. Laparoscopic weight loss surgery in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study on the effect of age on outcomes. Am Surg. 2019;85(3):273–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaplan U, Penner S, Farrokhyar F, et al. Bariatric surgery in the elderly is associated with similar surgical risks and significant long-term health benefits. Obes Surg. 2018;28(8):2165–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Keefe KL, Kemmeter PR, Kemmeter KD. Bariatric surgery outcomes in patients aged 65 years and older at an American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery center of excellence. Obes Surg. 2010;20(9):1199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Wang J, Sun X, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity and related comorbidities: a meta-analysis of 21 studies. Obes Surg. 2015;25(1):19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marczuk P, Kubisa MJ, Święch M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly patients—systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;29(2):361–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moon RC, Kreimer F, Teixeira AF, et al. Morbidity rates and weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding in patients older than 60 years old: which procedure to choose? Obes Surg. 2016;26(4):730–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Ying Jiang and Xiong Zhu for their helpful suggestions.

Funding

This study is supported by the Popularization and Application Project of the Health Commission of Sichuan Province (No.19PJ012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanjun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval Statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent does not apply.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, C., Yan, T., Liu, H. et al. Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Elder Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. OBES SURG 30, 3408–3416 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04577-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04577-2

Keywords

Navigation