Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antibiotic Treatment of Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The antibiotic rifaximin is used to treat non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Methane production is associated with constipation and its severity in constipation-predominant IBS (C-IBS). A previous retrospective study suggested that rifaximin and neomycin was superior to neomycin alone in improving symptoms in methane-positive subjects.

Aims

To determine the effectiveness of neomycin alone or with rifaximin in improving symptoms in methane-positive C-IBS subjects.

Methods

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed from 2010 to 2013 at three tertiary care centers. Subjects aged 18–65 with C-IBS (Rome II criteria) and breath methane (>3 ppm) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were recruited. Subjects completed a baseline symptom questionnaire rating the severity of abdominal and bowel symptoms on a visual analog scale and were randomized to receive neomycin and placebo or neomycin and rifaximin for 14 days. Symptom severity was assessed by weekly questionnaire for 2 weeks of therapy and 4 additional weeks of follow-up.

Results

Thirty-one subjects (16 neomycin and placebo, 15 neomycin and rifaximin) were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Constipation severity was significantly lower in the neomycin and rifaximin group (28.6 ± 30.8) compared to neomycin alone (61.2 ± 24.1) (P = 0.0042), with greater improvement in constipation (P = 0.007), straining (P = 0.017) and bloating (P = 0.020), but not abdominal pain. In the neomycin and rifaximin group, subjects with methane <3 ppm after treatment reported significantly lower constipation severity (30.5 ± 21.8) than subjects with persistent methane (67.2 ± 32.1) (P = 0.020).

Conclusions

Rifaximin plus neomycin is superior to neomycin alone in improving multiple C-IBS symptoms. This effect is predicted by a reduction in breath methane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandler RS, Everhart JE, Donowitz M, et al. The burden of selected digestive diseases in the Unites States. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1500–1511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thompson WG, Longstreth GF, Drossman DA, Heaton KW, Irvine EJ, Muller-Lissner SA. Functional bowel disorders and functional abdominal pain. Gut. 1999;45:II43–II47.

  3. Halvorson HA, Schlett CD, Riddle MS. Post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1894–1899.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thabane M, Kottachchi DT, Marshall JK. Systematic review and meta-analysis: the incidence and prognosis of post-infectious irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:535–544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah ED, Basseri RJ, Chong K, et al. Abnormal breath testing in IBS: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:2441–2449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Posserud I, Stotzer PO, Björnsson ES, et al. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut. 2007;56:802–808.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pyleris E, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Tzivras D, et al. The prevalence of overgrowth by aerobic bacteria in the small intestine by small bowel culture: relationship with irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1321–1329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang C, Funari V, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al. Deep sequencing reveals that the microbiome of the human duodenum is unique and unrelated to stool bacterial profiling. Gastroenterology. 2013;144:S908.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pimentel M, Lembo A, Chey WD, et al. Rifaximin therapy for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome without constipation. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:22–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kunkel D, Basseri RJ, Makhani MD, et al. Methane on breath test is associated with constipation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1612–1618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Attaluri A, Jackson M, Valestin J, et al. Methanogenic flora is associated with altered colonic transit but not stool characteristics in constipation without IBS. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1407–1411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pimentel M, Lin HC, Enayati P, et al. Methane, a gas produced by enteric bacteria, slows intestinal transit, an augments small intestinal contractile activity. Am J Physiol. 2006;290:G1089–G1095.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee S, Park S, Low K, et al. The degree of methane production in IBS correlates with the severity of constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:837–841.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pimentel M, Chatterjee S, Chow EJ, et al. Neomycin improves constipation predominant irritable bowel syndrome in a fashion that is dependent on the presence of methane gas: sub-analysis of a double blind randomized controlled study. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1297–1301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Low K, Hwang L, Hua J, et al. A combination of rifaximin and neomycin is most effective in treating irritable bowel syndrome patients with methane on lactulose breath test. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:547–550.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim G, Deepinder F, Morales W, et al. Methanobrevibacter smithii is the predominant methanogen in patients with constipation predominant IBS and methane on breath. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:3213–3218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Menees SB, Maneerattannaporn M, Kim HM, et al. The effect and safety of rifaximin for the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:28–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funding from Salix Pharmaceuticals. Salix provided the placebo and rifaximin for this study and was responsible for the randomization of study subjects and blinding of investigators to the study drugs during the conduct of the study, but were not involved in any other aspect of the study including implementation, recruitment, analysis or construction of the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Pimentel has received grants from and is a consultant for Salix Pharmaceuticals, with whom Cedars-Sinai has a licensing agreement. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose. This study was supported by funding from Salix Pharmaceuticals.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Pimentel.

Additional information

Trial Registration: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00945334).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pimentel, M., Chang, C., Chua, K.S. et al. Antibiotic Treatment of Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 59, 1278–1285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3157-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3157-8

Keywords

Navigation