Abstract
Radiation exposure is a critical issue in multidetector CT (MDCT) particularly since fast MDCT scanners have become widely available, and the method has been proposed as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for an increasing number of clinical applications. Additional features of MDCT imaging affecting individual dose are related to the inappropriate use of scanners caused by practices such as scanning beyond the area of interest or acquiring unnecessary multiphase image sets. In order to reduce individual exposure and in accordance with the ALARA principle, several strategies have been implemented over the last few years which are based on X-ray emission or optimization of scanning parameters (i.e. mAs, kV, pitch, collimation) or which take account of the individual patient’s characteristics (automatic exposure control systems and ECG-pulsing techniques for ECG-gated acquisitions). These strategies allow optimization of image quality while keeping individual exposure at the lowest level. We review here these different strategies taking into account the relationship between image noise and different scanning parameters. Data from the literature are discussed, and current technological developments are considered, including initial results of dual source and SnapShot pulse technologies which have been shown to result in a significant dose reduction in ECG-gated cardiac acquisitions without compromising image quality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kalender WA (2000) Computed tomography: fundamentals, system technology, image quality, applications. Publicis MCD Verlag, Erlangen Munich, pp 76–78
Golding SJ, Shrimpton PC (2002) Radiation dose in CT: are we meeting the challenge? Br J Radiol 75:1–4
International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the ICRP, ICRP Publication 60. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Morin RL, Gerber TC, McCollough CH (2003) Radiation dose in computed tomography of the heart. Circulation 107:917–922
Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM et al (2004) CT of coronary artery disease, Radiology 232:18–37
Ohnesorge B, Flohr T, Becker C et al (2000) Cardiac imaging by means of electrocardiographically gated multisection spiral CT: initial experience, Radiology 217:564–571
Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K (2005) Basics of cardiac multidetector CT: techniques and contrast application. Eur Radiol 15[Suppl 2]:B2–B9
Flohr TG, Stierstorfef K, Ulzheimer S et al (2005) Image reconstruction and image quality evaluation for a 64-slice CT scanner with z-flying focal spot. Med Phys 32:2536–2547
Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323
Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557
Hunold P, Vogt FM, Schmermund A et al (2003) Radiation exposure during cardiac CT: effective doses at multidetector row CT and electron-beam CT. Radiology 226:145–152
Bae KT, Hong C, Whiting BR (2004) Radiation dose in multidetector row computer tomography cardiac imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:859–863
Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS et al (2006) Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1840–1845
Jakobs TF, Wintersperger BJ, Herzog P et al (2003) Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using multislice CT with retrospective ECG gating. Eur Radiol 13:1923–1930
Hohl C, Muhlenbruch G, Wildberger JE et al (2006) Estimation of radiation exposure in low-dose multislice computed tomography of the heart and comparison with a calculation program. Eur Radiol 16:1841–1846
Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2005) Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT. Radiology 233:649–657
Francone M, Napoli A, Carbone I et al (2007) Noninvasive imaging of the coronary arteries using a 64-row multidetector CT scanner: initial clinical experience and radiation dose concerns. Radiol Med 112:31–46
Francone M, Di Castro E, Napoli A et al (2007) Dose reduction and image quality assessment in 64-detector row computed tomography of the coronary arteries using an automatic exposure control system. J Comput Assist Tomogr (in press)
Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al (2002) Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 12:1081–1086
Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268
Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al (2006) Dualsource CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 16:1409–1415
McCollough CH, Primak AN, Saba O et al (2007) Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. Radiology 243:775–784
Stolzmann P, Scheffel H, Schertler T et al (2007) Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Radiol. DOI 10.1007/s00330-007-0786-8
Sablayrolles JL, Treutenaere JM, Feignoux J et al (2007) Cardiac CT exam at 5 mSv average without compromising the image quality with the SnapShot Pulse mode on LightSpeed VCT XT. Abstract of the ESCR European Society of Cardiac Radiology 2007. Eur Radiol 10:2714
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Catalano, C., Francone, M., Ascarelli, A. et al. Optimizing radiation dose and image quality. Eur Radiol Suppl 17 (Suppl 6), 26–32 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10406-007-0225-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10406-007-0225-6