Abstract
Aim
To transform knowledge from public health and health services research into actual improvement of services is highly relevant for spending public research resources effectively. Fostering stakeholder interaction throughout the entire research process is one potential avenue towards this aim. The objective of this paper is to look for established practices with the aim to promote the usability of research in policy and practice through interaction.
Subject and methods
We conducted 11 semi-structured telephone-interviews with senior experts from the same number of public health and health services research institutions in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Norway.
Results
Practice patterns are manifold, but three key domains were identified:
-
1.
Research implementation is explicitly part of the organisation’s mission. Research commissioning institutions serve as intermediaries between research, policy and practice.
-
2.
Funds are earmarked for implementation activities. In regular evaluation cycles special consideration is given to the impact of research.
-
3.
Multiple forums for interaction support the ability of researchers to actively communicate with stakeholders. Network-building skills are developed alongside scientific competence.
Conclusion
Promising initiatives can be found in practice. Further research is needed into what difference it makes how the exchange between research and policy is organised.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Advisory Council on Health Research (2008) Healthy services research. The future of health services research in The Netherlands (in Dutch, executive summary in English). RGO no. 59, Health Council of the Netherlands, The Hague
Allen P, Peckham S, Anderson S, Goodwin N (2007) Commissioning research that is used: the experience of the NHS service delivery and organisation research and development programme. Evid Policy 3(1):119–134
Bekker M, van Egmond S, Wehrens R, Putters K, Bal R (2010) Linking research and policy in Dutch healthcare: infrastructure, innovations and impacts. Evid Policy 6(2):237–253
Bijker WE, Bal R, Hendriks R (2009) Paradox of scientific authority: the role of scientific advice in democracies. MIT Press, Boston, MA
Clarence E (2002) Technocracy reinvented: the new evidence-based policy movement. Publ Policy Admin 17(3):1–11
Davies H (2009) Co-producing knowledge? Presentation at the Economic and Social Research Council research seminar series. St. Andrews, UK. Nov 2009. www.sdhi.ac.uk/pastevents.htm#ESRC. Accessed 15 Jan 2011
Delvaux B, Mangez E (2008) Towards a sociology of the knowledge-policy relation. Literature review. http://knowandpol.eu/IMG/pdf/literature_sythesis_final_version_english.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2011
Ettelt S, Mays N (2011) Health services research in Europe and its use for informing policy. J Health Serv Res Policy 16(7):48–60
Goering P, Butterill D, Jacobson N, Sturtevant D (2003) Linkage and exchange at the organizational level: a model of collaboration between research and policy. J Health Serv Res Policy 8(Suppl 2):14–19
Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M (2003) The utilization of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Syst 1(1):2
Health Services Research Europe (2011) www.healthservicesresearch.eu. Accessed 15 Jan 2011
Innvaer S, Vist G, Trommald M, Oxman A (2002) Health policy-makers’ perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review. J Health Serv Res Policy 7:239–244
Lohr KN, Steinwachs DM (2002) Health services research: an evolving definition of the field. Heal Serv Res 37:15–17
McCarthy M, Clarke A (2007) European public health research literatures: measuring progress. Eur J Public Health 17(Suppl 1):2–5
Nutley S (2003) Bridging the policy/research divide: reflections and lessons from the UK. Keynote paper presented at the National Institute of Governance Conference, Canberra, Australia, 23–24 April 2003. www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/media-speeches/guestlectures/pdfs/tgls-nutley.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2011
Nutley S, Walter I, Davies HTO (2007) Using evidence: how research can improve public services. The Policy Press, Bristol, UK
Nutley S, Morton S, Jung T, Boaz A (2010) Evidence and policy in six European countries: diverse approaches and common challenges. Evid Policy 6(2):131–144
Parsons W (2002) From muddling through to muddling up: evidence based policy making and the modernisation of British government. Publ Policy Admin 17(3):43–60
Patera N (2011) Strengthening the knowledge base for a better health system: inspirations from good practice for capacity building in health services research and public health research. HTA project report No. 48, Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Vienna
Quinn M (2002) Evidence based or people based policy making? A view from Wales. Publ Policy Admin 17(3):29–42
Strengthening Public Health Research in Europe (2011) www.ucl.ac.uk/public-health/sphere. Accessed 15 Jan 2011
Weiss CH (2000) Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? In: Rogers PJ, Petrosino A, Heuber TA, Hascia TA (eds) Program theory evaluation: practice, promise and problems. New Directions Eval 87:35–45
WHO (2004) World report on knowledge for better health: strengthening health systems. World Health Organization, Geneva
Conflicts of interest
None declared
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOC 42 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patera, N., Wild, C. Linking public health research with policy and practice in three European countries. J Public Health 21, 473–479 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-013-0556-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-013-0556-9