Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: state of the art

  • Challenges in Coloproctology
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Achieving a high-quality total mesorectal excision (TME) resection specimen is a central tenet of curative rectal cancer management. However, operating at the caudal extremity of the pelvis is inherently challenging and a number of patient- and tumour-related factors may increase the risk of obtaining a poor TME specimen and positive resection margins. Transanal TME (TaTME) is an advanced surgical technique developed to overcome the limitations in pelvic exposure and instrumentation of transabdominal surgery. This up-to-date narrative review describes the evolution of TME surgery, the indications for TaTME, current published outcomes, its limitations and future developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cancer Research UK, online source. [Cited 18 June 2017]. http://www.cancerresarch.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/bowel-cancer#heading-Zero

  2. Cancer Australia, online source. [Cited 18 June 2017]. https://bowel-cancer.canceraustralia.gov.au/statistics

  3. Heald RJ (1979) A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med 22:277–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD et al (1998) Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch Surg 133:894–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Glimelius B, Tiret E, Cervantes A et al (2013) ESMO guidelines working group. Rectal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 24(suppl 6):vi81–vi88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD et al (2013) Standards practice task force of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 56:535–550

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heald RJ, Ryall RDH (1986) Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 1:1479–1482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA et al (2015) COLOR II Study Group. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH et al (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection versus open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1356–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ et al (2015) Effect of laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314:1346–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Spinelli A, D’Hoore A, Panis Y, Bemelman WA, Jayne DG, Furst A (2017) Critical appraisal of two randomized clinical trials on pathologic outcomes: laparoscopic vs. open resection for rectal cancer. Coloproctology 39:277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N et al (2014) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD005200

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buess G, Theiss R, Hutterer F et al (1983) Transanal endoscopic surgery of the rectum: testing a new method in animal experiments. Leber Magen Darm 13:73–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marks JH, Frenkel JL, D’Andrea AP et al (2011) Maximizing rectal cancer results: TEM and TATA techniques to expand sphincter preservation. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 20:501–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rattner D, Kalloo A (2006) ASGE/SAGES working group on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 20:329–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL (2007) Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice transluminal endoscopy surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc 21:1870–1874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S (2010) Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc 24:2200–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, Hompes R (2018) St. Gallen Colorectal Consensus Expert Group. St.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mesorectal excision. Surg Endosc 32:1091–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Arroyave MC, DeLacy FB, Lacy AM (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: Step by step description of the surgical technique for a two-teams approach. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:502–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marks G, Mohiuddin M, Rakinic J (1991) New hope and promise for sphincter preservation in the management of cancer of the rectum. Semin Oncol 18:388–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A et al (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18:19–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hasegawa A, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a video demonstration of rectal dissection. Dis Colon Rectum 59:157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A et al (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Emhoff IA, Le GC, Sylla P (2014) Transanal colorectal resection using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). Dig Endosc 26(Suppl 1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Caycedo-Marulanda A, Ma G, Jiang HY (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) in a single-surgeon setting: refinements of the technique during the learning phase. Tech Coloproctol 22:433–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mishra A, Keeler BD, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Simpson JA, Acheson AG (2014) The influence of laparoscopy on incisional hernia rates: a retrospective analysis of 1057 colorectal cancer resections. Colorectal Dis 16:815–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Orcutt ST, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL et al (2012) Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications. Tech Coloproctol 16:127–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ngu J, Wong AS (2016) Transanal natural orifice specimen extraction in colorectal surgery: bacteriological and oncological concerns. ANZ J Surg 86:299–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Motson RW, Whiteford MH, Hompes R et al. (2016) Current status of transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) following the second international consensus conference. Colorectal Dis 18: 13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Adamsen S, Hansen OH, Funch-Jensen P et al (1997) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective nationwide series. J Am Coll Surg 184:571–578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Atallah FS, Albert M, Monson JRT (2016) Critical concepts and important anatomic landmarks encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME): toward the mastery of a new operation for rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol 20:483–494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Atallah S (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision: full steam ahead. Tech Coloproctol 19:57–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Atallah S, Gonzalez P, Chadi S, Hompes R, Knol J (2017) Operative vectors, anatomic distortion, fluid dynamics and the inherent effects of pneumatic insufflation encountered during transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 21:783–794

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Bernardi MP, Bloemendaal AL, Albert M, Whiteford M, Stevenson AR, Hompes R (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision: dissection tips using ‘O’s and ‘triangles’. Tech Coloproctol 20:775–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stewart C, Sylla P (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision. In: Wexner SD, Fleshman JW (eds) Colon and rectal surgery: abdominal operations, 2nd edn. Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  39. Atallah S, Albert M (2016) The neurovascular bundle of Walsh and other anatomic considerations crucial in preventing urethral injury in males undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision. Tech Coloproctol 20:411–412

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Drake J, Stotland P, Ashamalla S, Albert M (2015) The use of a lighted stent as a method for identifying the urethra in male patients undergoing transanal total mesorectal excision: a video demonstration. Tech Coloproctol 19:375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mabardy A, Lee L, Valpato AP, Atallah S (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision with intersphincteric resection and use of fluorescent angiography and a lighted urethral stent for distal rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 21:581–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Barnes TG, Penna M, Hompes R, Cunningham C (2017) Fluorescence to highlight the urethra: a human cadaveric study. Tech Coloproctol 21:439–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Velthuis S, Veltcamp Helbach M, Tuynman JB et al (2015) Intra-abdominal bacterial contamination in TAMIS total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 29:3319–3323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM (2010) NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Surg Endosc 24:1205–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. de Lacy FB, van Laarhoven JJEM, Pena R, Arroyave MC, Bravo R, Cuatrecasas M, Lacy AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2017 Nov 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5944-8 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Deijen CL, Tsai A, Koedam TW et al (2016) Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Tech Coloproctol 20:811–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S et al. Incidence and risk factors for anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by transanal total mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg. 2018 Jan 5. [Epub ahead of print]

  48. Araujo SE, Crawshaw B, Mendes CR, Delaney CP (2015) Transanal mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence. Tech Coloproctol 19:69–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Koedam TW, van Ramshorst GH, Deijen CL et al (2017) Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer: effects on patient-reported quality of life and functional outcome. Tech Coloproctol 21:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Pontallier A, Denost Q, Van Geluwe B et al (2016) Potential sexual function improvement by using transanal mesorectal approach for laparoscopic low rectal cancer excision. Surg Endosc 30:4924–4933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Marks JH, Montenegro GA, Salem JF, Shields MV, Marks GJ (2016) Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol 20:467–473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2017) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5926-x [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Velthuis S, Nieuwenhuis DH, Ruijter TE et al (2014) Transanal versus traditional laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal carcinoma. Surg Endosc 28:3494–3499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jiang H-P, Li Y-S, Wang B, Wang C, Liu F, Shen Z-L, Ye Y-J, Wang S (2018) Pathological outcomes of transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6103-6 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A et al (2016) COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 30:3210–3215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. COLOR III, Trial, online source. [Cited 18 June 2017]. https://www.color3trial.com/?p=471

  57. Multicenter Phase II Study of Transanal TME (taTME). Online source. [Cited 10 March 2018]. http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03144765?term=tatme&recrs=ab&rank=2

  58. McLemore EC, Harnsberger CR, Broderick RC et al (2016) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a training pathway. Surg Endosc 30:4130–4135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Francis N, Penna M, Mackenzie H et al (2017) Consensus on structured training curriculum for transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Surg Endosc 31:2711–2719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Atallah S, Brady RR (2016) The iLappSurgery taTME app: a modern adjunct to the teaching of surgical techniques. Tech Coloproctol 20:665–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Pucher PH, Mayo D, Dixon AR et al (2016) Learning curves and surgical outcomes for proctored adoption of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: cumulative sum curve analysis. Surg Endosc 31:1421–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Mackenzie H, Cuming T, Miskovic D et al (2015) Design, delivery, and validation of a trainer curriculum for the national laparoscopic colorectal training program in England. Ann Surg 261:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Atallah SB, DuBose AC, Burke JP et al (2017) Uptake of transanal total mesorectal excision in North America: initial assessment of a structured training program and the experience of delegate surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1023–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Abbott SC, Stevenson ARL, Bell SW et al (2018) An assessment of an Australasian pathway for the introduction of transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). Colorectal Dis 20:O1–O6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Westwood.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Westwood, D.A., Cuda, T.J., Hamilton, A.E.R. et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: state of the art. Tech Coloproctol 22, 649–655 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1844-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1844-8

Keywords

Navigation