Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic colectomy for stages II and III colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 168 patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is emerging evidence that complete mesocolic excision (CME) for colon cancer produces favorable oncologic outcomes. The applicability of CME technique in laparoscopic colectomy has not been fully explored. The aim of our retrospective study was to evaluate the feasibility of the CME technique with D3 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic colectomy and its short- and long-term outcomes.

Methods

Between September 2006 and December 2009, 168 laparoscopic colectomies were performed for stages II and III colon cancer. Prospectively, collected data on demographics, tumor characteristics, complications, and outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Eighty-seven patients (51.8 %) had stage II colon cancer, and 81 patients had stage III cancer. The mean operative time was 196.0 ± 61.2 min. The overall morbidity rate was 17.8 %, which included anastomotic leak in 10 patients (5.9 %). There was no operative mortality. The number of lymph nodes harvested was 27.8 ± 13.6. With a median follow-up of 57.3 months, locoregional recurrence and systemic metastasis developed in 6 (3.6 %) and 14 patients (8.3 %), respectively. Seven patients died of causes related to cancer, and all had stage III cancer. Disease-free survival at 5-years was 95.2 % for patients with stage II and 80.9 % for patients with stage III.

Conclusions

Standardization of laparoscopic CME and D3 lymphadenectomy is expedient. The technique is associated with acceptable morbidity and provides excellent oncologic outcomes for stage II and stage III colon cancer. A longer follow-up is needed to validate the enhancement of oncological outcome related to this surgical concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11:354–364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y et al (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 17:1–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K et al (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30:1763–1769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adamina M, Manwaring ML, Park KJ, Delaney CP (2012) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 26:2976–2980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E (2012) Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis 14:1357–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heald RJ (1988) The ‘holy plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med 81:503–508

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quirke P, Dixon MF, Durdey P, Williams NS (1986) Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 2:996–999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Mander BJ, Bissett IP, Newland RC (2003) Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46:860–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertelsen CA, Bols B, Ingeholm P, Jansen JE, Neuenschwander AU, Vilandt J (2011) Can the quality of colonic surgery be improved by standardization of surgical technique with complete mesocolic excision? Colorectal Dis 13:1123–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pramateftakis MG (2010) Optimizing colonic cancer surgery: high ligation and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy. Tech Coloproctol 14(Suppl 1):S49–S51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC et al (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Sun CT (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male sigmoid and upper rectal cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1980–1990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee SD, Lim SB (2009) D3 lymphadenectomy using a medial to lateral approach for curable right-sided colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Uematsu D, Akiyama G, Magishi A (2011) Radical lymphadenectomy for advanced colon cancer via separation of the mesocolon into two layers as in filleting fish. Surg Endosc 25:1659–1660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kobayashi M, Okamoto K, Namikawa T, Okabayashi T, Sakamoto J, Hanazaki K (2007) Laparoscopic D3 lymph node dissection with preservation of the superior rectal artery for the treatment of proximal sigmoid and descending colon cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 17:461–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hahn KY, Baek SJ, Joh YG, Kim SH (2012) Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 58 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:561–566

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarli L, Bader G, Iusco D et al (2005) Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of TNM stage II colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 41:272–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bilimoria KY, Palis B, Stewart AK et al (2008) Impact of tumor location on nodal evaluation for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 51:154–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris EJ, Maughan NJ, Forman D, Quirke P (2007) Identifying stage III colorectal cancer patients: the influence of the patient, surgeon, and pathologist. J Clin Oncol 25:2573–2579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yada H, Sawai K, Taniguchi H, Hoshima M, Katoh M, Takahashi T (1997) Analysis of vascular anatomy and lymph node metastases warrants radical segmental bowel resection for colon cancer. World J Surg 21:109–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park IJ, Choi GS, Kang BM, Lim KH, Jun SH (2009) Lymph node metastasis patterns in right-sided colon cancers: is segmental resection of these tumors oncologically safe? Ann Surg Oncol 16:1501–1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2009) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma, 2nd English edn. Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo

  32. Storli KE, Søndenaa K, Furnes B, Eide GE (2013) Outcome after introduction of complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer is similar for open and laparoscopic surgical treatments. Dig Surg 30:317–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, J.W., Amar, A.H.Y., Kim, S.H. et al. Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic colectomy for stages II and III colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 168 patients. Tech Coloproctol 18, 795–803 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1134-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1134-z

Keywords

Navigation