Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overview of anal fistula and systematic review of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT)

  • Review
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anal fistula management has long been a challenge for surgeons. Presently, no technique exists that is ideal for treating all types of anal fistula, whether simple or complex. A higher incidence of poor sphincter function and recurrence after surgery has encouraged the development of a new sphincter-sparing procedure, ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT), first described by Van der Hagen et al. in 2006. We assessed the safety, feasibility, success rate, and continence of LIFT as a sphincter-saving procedure. A literature search of articles in electronic databases published from January 2006 to August 2012 was performed. Analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews recommendations. All LIFT-related articles published in the English language were included. We excluded case reports, abstracts, letters, non-English language articles, and comments. The procedure was described in detail as reported by Rojanasakul. Thirteen original studies, including 435 patients, were reviewed. The most common fistula procedure type was transsphincteric (92.64 %). The overall median operative time was 39 (±20.16) min. Eight authors performed LIFT as a same-day surgery, whereas the others admitted patients to the hospital, with an overall median stay of 1.25 days (range 1–5 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 1.88 % of patients. All patients remained continent postoperatively. The overall mean length of follow-up was 33.92 (±17.0) weeks. The overall mean healing rate was 81.37 (±16.35) % with an overall mean healing period of 8.15 (±5.96) weeks. Fistula recurrence occurred in 7.58 % of patients. LIFT represents a new, easy-to-learn, and inexpensive sphincter-sparing procedure that provides reasonable results. LIFT is safe and feasible, with favorable short- and long-term outcomes. However, additional prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wexner SD, Shawki S (2011) Idiopathic fistula-in-ano. World J Gastroenterol 17:3277–3285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sandborn WJ, Fazio VW, Feagan BG, Hanauer SB (2003) AGA technical review on perianal Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 125:1508–1530

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surg 63:1–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasilevsky CA, Beck DE, Roberts PL et al (2011) Anorectal abscess and fistula. The AS-CRS [Text book] of colon and rectal surgery, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 219–244

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Bleier J, Moloo H (2011) Current management of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano. World J Gastroenterol 17:3286–3291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Malik AI, Nelson RL (2008) Surgical management of anal fistulae: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 10:420–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rojanasakul A (2009) LIFT procedure a simplified technique for fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 13:237–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wang WD, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD (1996) Anal fistula surgery. Factors associated with recurrence and incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 39:723–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rojanasakul A, Pattana-arun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K (2007) Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano: the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thail 90:581–586

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abcarian AM, Estrada JJ, Park J et al (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract: early results of a pilot study. Dis Colon Rectum 55:778–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis CN (2010) Outcomes with the use of bioprosthetic grafts to reinforce the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (BioLIFT procedure) for the management of complex anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1361–1364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tan KK, Tan IJ, Lim FS, Koh DC, Tsang CB (2011) The anatomy of failures following the ligation of intersphincteric tract technique for anal fistula: a review of 93 patients over 4 years. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1368–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mushaya C, Bartlett L, Schulze B, Ho YH (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract compared with advancement flap for complex anorectal fistulas requiring initial seton drainage. Am J Surg 3:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Onkelen RS, Gosselink MP, Schouten WR (2012) Is it possible to improve the outcome of transanal advancement flap repair for high transsphincteric fistulas by additional ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract? Dis Colon Rectum 55:163–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA (1999) Prospective comparison of faecal incontinence grading systems. Gut 44:77–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ooi K, Skinner I, Croxford M, Faragher I, McLaughlin S (2012) Managing fistula-in-ano with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure: the Western Hospital experience. Colorectal Dis 14:599–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sileri P, Franceschilli L, Angelucci GP et al (2011) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) to treat anal fistula: early results from a prospective observational study. Tech Coloproctol 15:413–416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shanwani A, Nor AM, Amri N (2010) Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 53:39–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen TA, Liu KY, Yeh CY (2012) High ligation of the fistula track by lateral approach: a modified sphincter-saving technique for advanced anal fistulas. Colorectal Dis 14:e627–e630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aboulian A, Kaji AH, Kumar RR (2011) Early result of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract for fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 54:289–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ortiz H, Marzo J (2000) Endorectal flap advancement repair and fistulectomy for high trans-sphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas. Br J Surg 87:1680–1683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van der Hagen SJ, Baeten CG, Soeters PB (2006) Long-term outcome following mucosal advancement flap for high perianal fistulas and fistulotomy for low perianal fistulas: recurrent perianal fistulas: failure of treatment or recurrent patient disease? Int J Colorectal Dis 21:784–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozuner G, Hull TL, Cartmill J (1996) Long-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 39:10–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Joo JS, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ (1998) Endorectal advancement flap in perianal Crohn’s disease. Am Surg 64:147–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller GV, Finan PJ (1998) Flap advancement and core fistulectomy for complex rectal fistula. Br J Surg 85:108–110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marchesa P, Hull TL, Fazio VW (1998) Advancement sleeve flaps for treatment of severe perianal Crohn’s disease. Br J Surg 85:1695–1698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreis ME, Jehle EC, Ohlemann M (1998) Functional results after transanal rectal advancement flap repair of trans-sphincteric fistula. Br J Surg 85:240–242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sentovich SM (2001) Fibrin glue for all anal fistulas. J Gastrointest Surg 5:158–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Buchanan GN, Bartram CI, Phillips RK (2003) Efficacy of fibrin sealant in the management of complex anal fistula: a prospective trial. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1167–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gisbertz SS, Sosef MN, Festen S (2005) Treatment of fistulas in ano with fibrin glue. Dig Surg 22:91–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lawes DA, Efron JE, Abbas M (2008) Early experience with the bioabsorbable anal fistula plug. World J Surg 32:1157–1159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Christoforidis D, Etzioni DA, Goldberg SM (2008) Treatment of complex anal fistulas with the collagen fistula plug. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lo O, Wei R, Foo D, Law WL (2012) Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure for the management of cryptoglandular anal fistulas. Surg Pract 16:120–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwandner O (2011) Obesity is a negative predictor of success after surgery for complex anal fistula. BMC Gastroenterol 11:61

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Alasari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alasari, S., Kim, N.K. Overview of anal fistula and systematic review of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT). Tech Coloproctol 18, 13–22 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1050-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1050-7

Keywords

Navigation