Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of age on posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in women with obstructed defecation syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of risk factors is particularly useful to prevent or manage pelvic floor dysfunction but although a number of such factors have been proposed, results remain inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of aging on the incidence of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome evaluated using echodefecography.

Methods

A total of 334 patients with obstructed defecation were evaluated using echodefecography in order to quantify posterior pelvic floor dysfunction (rectocele, intussusception, mucosal prolapse, paradoxical contraction or non-relaxation of the puborectalis muscle, and grade III enterocele/sigmoidocele). Patients were grouped according to the age (Group I = patients up to 50 years of age; Group II = patients over 50 years of age) to evaluate the isolated and associated incidence of dysfunctions. To evaluate the relationship between dysfunction and age-related changes, patients were also stratified into decades.

Results

Group I included 196 patients and Group II included 138. The incidence of significant rectocele, intussusception, rectocele associated with intussusception, rectocele associated with mucosal prolapse and 3 associated disorders was higher in Group II, whereas anismus was more prevalent in Group I. The incidence of significant rectocele, intussusception, mucosal prolapse and grade III enterocele/sigmoidocele was found to increase with age. Conversely, anismus decreased with age.

Conclusions

Aging was shown to influence the incidence of posterior pelvic floor disorders (rectocele, intussusception, mucosa prolapse and enterocele/sigmoidocele), but not the incidence of anismus, in women with obstructed defecation syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A (2002) Pelvic organ prolapse in the women`s health initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1160–1166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Serati M, Salvatore S, Khullar V et al (2008) Prospective study to assess risk factors for pelvic floor dysfunction after delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:313–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer S, Schreyer A, De Grandi P, Hohlfeld P (1998) The effects of birth on urinary continence mechanisms and other pelvic-floor characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 92:613–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dietz HP (2008) Prolapse worsens with age, doesn’t it? Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 48:587–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soares FA, Regadas FS, Murad-Regadas SM et al (2009) Role of age, bowel function and parity on anorectocele pathogenesis according to cinedefecography and anal manometry evaluation. Colorectal Dis 11:947–950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Rodrigues LV et al (2009) Types of pelvic floor dysfunctions in nulliparous, vaginal delivery, and cesarean section female patients with obstructed defecation syndrome identified by echodefecography. Int J Colorectal Dis 10:1227–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murad-Regadas SM, Peterson TV, Pinto RA, Regadas FS, Sands DR, Wexner SD (2009) Defecographic pelvic floor abnormalities in constipated patients: does mode of delivery matter? Tech Coloproctol 13:279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kepenekci I, Keskinkılıc B, Akınsu F et al (2011) Prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in the female population and the impact of age, mode of delivery, and parity. Dis Colon Rectum 54:85–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M (2004) Dynamic MR. Colpocystorectography assessing pelvic floor descent. Eur Radiol 7:1309–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dvorkin LS, Hetzer F, Scott SM, Williams NS, Gedroyc W, Lunniss PJ (2004) Open magnet MR defaecography compared with evacuation proctography in the diagnosis and management of patients with rectal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 6:45–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barthet M, Portier F, Heyries L (2000) Dynamic anal endosonography may challenge defecography for assessing dynamic anorectal disorders: Results of a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 32:300–305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Beer-Gabel M, Teshler M, Schechtman E, Zbar AP (2004) Dynamic transperineal ultrasound vs. defecography in patients with evacuatory difficulty: a pilot study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19:60–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dietz HP, Steensma AB (2005) Posterior compartment prolapse on two-dimensional and three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasound: the distinction between true rectocele, perineal hypermobility and enterocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 26:73–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Piloni V, Spazzafumo L (2005) Evacuation sonography. Tech Coloproctol 9:119–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV et al (2007) A novel procedure to assess anismus using three-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography. Colorectal Dis 9:159–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Silva FR, Soares FA, Escalante RD (2008) A novel three-dimensional dynamic anorectal ultrasonography technique (echodefecography) to assess obstructed defecation, a comparison with defecography. Surg Endosc 22:974–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regadas FSP, Lima Barreto RG, Murad-Regadas SM, Veras Rodrigues L, Pereira Oliveira LM (2012) Correlation between anorectocele with the anterior anal canal and anorectal junction anatomy using echodefecography. Tech Coloproctol 16:133–138

    Google Scholar 

  18. Agachan F, Pfeifer J, Wexner SD (1996) Defecography and proctography: results of 744 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39:899–905

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Felt-Bersma RJ, Luth WJ, Janssen JJ, Meuwissen SG (1990) Defecography in patients with anorectal disorders. Which findings are clinically relevant? Dis Colon Rectum 33:277–284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelvin FM, Hale DS, Maglinte DD, Patten BJ, Benson JT (1999) Female pelvic organ prolapse: diagnostic contribution of dynamic cystoproctography and comparison with physical examination. Am J Roentgenol 173:31–37

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Marti MC, Roche B, Deléaval J (1999) Rectoceles: value of video-defecography in selection of treatment policy. Colorectal Dis 1:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen HH, Iroatulam A, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (2001) Associations of defecography and physiologic findings in male patients with rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 5:157–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Groenendijk AG, Birnie E, Boeckxstaens GE, Roovens JP, Bonsel GJ (2009) Anorectal function testing and anal endosonography in the diagnostic work-up of patients with primary pelvic organ prolapse. Gynecol Obstet Invest 67:187–194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Santoro GA, Wieczorek AP, Stankiewicz A, Wozniak MM, Bogusiewicz M, Rechbereger T (2009) High-resolution three dimensional endovaginal ultrasonography in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy: a preliminary study. Int Urogynecol J 20:1213–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dietz HP (2010) Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 202:321–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Porter WE, Steele A, Walsh P, Kohli N, Karram MM (1999) The anatomic and functional outcomes of defect-specific rectocele repairs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1353–1359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson JR, Chen AH, Pettit PMD, Bridges MD (2002) Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187:1494–1500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Renzi A, Izzo D, Di Sarno G et al (2006) Cinedefecographic findings in patients with obstructed defection syndrome. A study in 420 cases. Minerva Chir 61:493–499

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S, Norwegian EPINCONT Study (2009) Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med 348:900–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peschers UM, Schaer GN, DeLancey JO, Schuessler B (1997) Levator ani function before and after childbirth. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:1004–1008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI (1993) Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med 329:1905–1911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rieger N, Schloithe A, Saccone G, Wattchow D (1998) A prospective study of anal injury due to childbirth. Scand J Gastroenterol 33:950–955

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Snooks SJ, Swash M, Mathers SE, Henry MM (1990) Effect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: a 5-year follow-up. Br J Surg 77:1358–1360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Felt-Bersma RJF, Cuesta MA (2001) Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 30:199–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Finco C, Luongo B, Savastano S, Polato F (2007) Selection criteria for surgery in patients with obstructed defecation, rectocele and anorectal prolapse. Chir Ital 59:513–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dietz HP, Clarke B (2005) Prevalence of rectocele in young nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 45:391–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wijffels NA, Collinson R, Cunningam C, Lindsey I (2010) What is the natural history on internal rectal prolapse? Colorectal Dis 12:822–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rociu E, Stoker J, Eijkemans MJ, Laméris JS (2000) Normal anal sphincter anatomy and age- and sex-related variations at high-spatial resolution endoanal MR imaging. Radiology 217:395–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Goh J (2002) Biomechanical properties of prolapsed vaginal tissue in pre- and postmenopausal women. Int Urogynecol J 13:76–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wald A, Hinds JP, Caruana BJ (1989) Psychological and physiological characteristics of patients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gastroenterology 97:932–937

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Stewart RB, Moore MT, Marks RG, Hall WE (1992) Correlates of constipation in an ambulatory elderly population. Am J Gastroenterol 87:859–864

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflict of interest exists.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Ceará, Av Pontes Vieira, 2551., Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil

    S. M. Murad-Regadas, L. V. Rodrigues, D. C. Furtado, F. S. P. Regadas, G. Olivia da S. Fernandes, F. S. P. Regadas Filho, A. C. Gondim & R. de Paula Joca da Silva

  2. R. Atilano de Moura 430, Ap. 200, Ceará, Fortaleza, 60810-180, Brazil

    S. M. Murad-Regadas

Authors
  1. S. M. Murad-Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. V. Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. C. Furtado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. S. P. Regadas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Olivia da S. Fernandes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. F. S. P. Regadas Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. C. Gondim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. R. de Paula Joca da Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. M. Murad-Regadas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murad-Regadas, S.M., Rodrigues, L.V., Furtado, D.C. et al. The influence of age on posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in women with obstructed defecation syndrome. Tech Coloproctol 16, 227–232 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0831-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0831-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation