Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Initial experience of treating anal fistula with the Surgisis anal fistula plug

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Complex anal fistulas remain a challenge for the colorectal surgeon. The anal fistula plug has been developed as a simple treatment for fistula-in-ano. We present and evaluate our experience with the Surgisis anal fistula plug from two centres.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected and analysed from consecutive patients undergoing insertion of a fistula plug between January 2007 and October 2009. Fistula plugs were inserted according to a standard protocol. Data collected included patient demographics, fistula characteristics and postoperative outcome.

Results

Forty-four patients underwent insertion of 62 plugs (27 males, mean age 45.6 years), 25 of whom had prior fistula surgery. Mean follow-up was 10.5 months Twenty-two patients (50%) had successful healing following the insertion of plug with an overall success rate of 23 out of 62 plugs inserted (35%). Nineteen out of 29 patients healed following first-time plug placement, whereas repeated plug placement was successful in 3 out of 15 patients (20%; p = 0.0097). There was a statistically significant difference in the healing rate between patients who had one or less operations prior to plug insertion (i.e. simple fistulas) compared with patients who needed multiple operations (18 out of 24 patients vs. 4 out of 20 patients; p = 0.0007).

Conclusions

Success of treatment with the Surgisis anal fistula plug relies on the eradication of sepsis prior to plug placement. Plugs inserted into simple tracts have a higher success rate, and recurrent insertion of plugs following previous plug failure is less likely to be successful. We suggest the fistula plug should remain a first-line treatment for primary surgery and simple tracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whiteford MH, Kilkenny J 3rd, Hyman N (2005) Standards practice task force; American society of colon and rectal surgeons. Practice parameters for the treatment of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano (revised). Dis Colon Rectum 48:1337–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamalainen KP, Sainio AP (1997) Cutting seton for anal fistulas: high risk of minor control defects. Dis Colon Rectum 40:1443–1446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Isbister WH, Al Sanea N (2001) The cutting seton: an experience at King Faisal Specialist Hospital. Dis Colon Rectum 44:722–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Graf W, Pahlman L, Ejerbald S (1995) Functional results after seton treatment of high transsphincteric anal fistulas. Eur J Surg 161:289–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ozuner G, Hull TL, Cartmill J, Fazio VW (1996) Long-term analysis of the use of transanal rectal advancement flaps for complicated anorectal/vaginal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 39:10–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tyler KM, Aarons CB, Sentovich SM (2007) Successful sphincter-sparing surgery for all anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1535–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Loungnarath R, Dietz DW, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW (2004) Fibrin glue treatment of complex anal fistulas has low success rate. Dis Colon Rectum 47:432–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cintron JR, Park JJ, Orsay CP (2000) Repair of fistula in ano using fibrin adhesive: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 43:944–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson EK, Gaw JU, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug vs. fibrin glue in closure of anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:371–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haim N, Neufield D, Ziv Y (2011) Long- term results of fibrin glue treatment for cryptoglandular perianal fistulas: a multicentre study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1279–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawes DA, Efron JE, Abbas M, Heppell J, Young-Fadok TM (2008) Early experience with the bioabsorbable anal fistula plug. World J Surg 32:1157–1159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Christoforidis D, Etzioni DA, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD, Mellgren A (2008) Treatment of complex anal fistulas with the collagen fistula plug. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Echenique I, Mella JR, Rosado F, Echenique IA, Mella MT, Quevedo G (2008) Puerto Rico experience with plugs in the treatment of anal fistulas. Bol Asoc Med P R 100:8–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Garg P (2009) To determine the efficacy of anal fistula plug in the treatment of high fistula-in-ano: an initial experience. Colorectal Dis 11(6):588–591

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thekkinkattil D, Botterill I, Ambrose NS et al (2009) Efficacy of the anal fistula plug in complex anorectal fistulae. Colorectal Dis 11:584–587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwandner O, Stadler F, Dietl O, Wirsching RP, Fuerst A (2008) Initial experience on efficacy in closure of cryptoglandular and Crohn’s transsphincteric fistulas by the use of the anal fistula plug. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:319–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Champagne BJ, O’Connor LM, Ferguson M, Orangio GR, Schertzer ME, Armstrong DN (2006) Efficacy of anal fistula plug in closure of cryptoglandular fistulas: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1817–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Safar B, Jobanputra S, Sands D, Weiss E, Nogeuras J, Wexner SD (2009) Anal fistula plug: initial experience and outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 52:248–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Ciga MA, Orteiza F, Armendariz P, de Miguel M (2009) Randomised clinical trial of anal fistula plugs versus endorectal advancement flap for the treatment of high cryptoglandular fistula in ano. Br J Surg 96:608–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang JY, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sternberg JA, Abel ME, Varma MG (2009) Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas: are fistula plugs an acceptable alternative? Dis Colon Rectum 52:692–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Parks A, Stitz R (1976) Symposium: fistula-in-ano. The treatment of high fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 19:487–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mizrahi N, Wexner SD, Zmora O et al (2002) Endorectal advancement flap: are there predictors of failure? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1616–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kodner IJ, Mazor A, Shemesh EI, Fry RD, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH (1993) Endorectal advancement flap repair of rectovaginal and other complicated anorectal fistulas. Surgery 114:682–689; discussion 689–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ellis CN (2007) Bioprosthetic plugs for complex anal fistulas: an early experience. J Surg Educ 64:36–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ky AJ, Sylla P, Steinhagen R, Steinhagen E, Khaitov S, Ly EK (2008) Collagen fistula plug for the treatment of anal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 51:838–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwandner T, Roblick MH, Kierer W, Brom A, Padberg W, Hirschburger M (2009) Surgical treatment of complex anal fistulas with the anal fistula plug: a prospective multicenter study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1578–1583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lunniss PJ, Sheffield JP, Talbot IC, Thomson JP, Phillips RK (1995) Persistence of idiopathic anal fistula may be related to epithelialization. Br J Surg 82:32–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Kopperen PJ, ten Kate FJ, Bemelman WA, Slors JF (2010) Histological identification of epithelium in perianal fistulae: a prospective study. Colorectal Dis 12:891–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McGee MF, Champagne BJ, Stulberg JJ, Reynolds H, Marderstein E, Delaney CP (2010) Tract length predicts successful closure with anal fistula in cryptoglandular fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1116–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, University College Hospital, London, UK

    S. Chan, J. McCullough, P. Vasas, A. Engledow, A. Windsor & C. R. Cohen

  2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, St Thomas’s Hospital, London, UK

    A. Schizas & A. Williams

  3. Department of General Surgery, University College London Hospital, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK

    C. R. Cohen

Authors
  1. S. Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. McCullough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Schizas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Vasas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. Engledow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Windsor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. A. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. C. R. Cohen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. R. Cohen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, S., McCullough, J., Schizas, A. et al. Initial experience of treating anal fistula with the Surgisis anal fistula plug. Tech Coloproctol 16, 201–206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0810-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0810-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation