Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: impact on IVF outcome

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bacterial vaginosis can increase obstetrical complications such as miscarriage, premature rupture of membranes and preterm delivery. The aim of our study was first to assess BV prevalence for infertile patients treated by in vitro fertilisation (IVF) using both the Nugent score and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and then to assess the impact of BV on the pregnancy rate after IVF. Vaginal samples were obtained from women followed for IVF in our Assisted Reproduction Technology (ART) Unit between August 2010 and April 2011. For each patient, two techniques were performed to diagnose BV: Gram staining to assess the Nugent score and a quantitative molecular analysis using a specific real-time PCR assay. Two groups were studied: normal flora (BV−) and BV (BV+). The primary outcome measure was the implantation rate. The secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate, early and late miscarriage, premature rupture of membranes, preterm delivery, mode of delivery and birthweight. A total of 307 patients were included. PCR revealed a prevalence of BV of 9.45 %. Among women who performed vaginal douching, 22.2 % were BV+, whereas 7.9 % of patients who did not douche were BV+ (p = 0.028). The embryo implantation rate was decreased between the BV− and BV+ groups (36.3 % vs. 27.6 %, p = 0.418), but it was not significant. Obstetrical outcomes did not present significant statistical differences among the groups. Vaginal douching significantly enhanced BV in women treated with IVF. We also observed a non-significant decrease of embryo implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate for women treated by IVF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Livengood CH (2009) Bacterial vaginosis: an overview for 2009. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2:28–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leitich H, Bodner-Adler B, Brunbauer M, Kaider A, Egarter C, Husslein P (2003) Bacterial vaginosis as a risk factor for preterm delivery: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:139–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fredricks DN, Fiedler TL, Marrazzo JM (2005) Molecular identification of bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 353:1899–1911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsson PG, Forsum U (2005) Bacterial vaginosis—a disturbed bacterial flora and treatment enigma. APMIS 113:305–316, Review

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allsworth JE, Peipert JF (2011) Severity of bacterial vaginosis and the risk of sexually transmitted infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:113.e1–113.e6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guaschino S, Ricci E, Franchi M, Frate GD, Tibaldi C, Santo DD et al (2003) Treatment of asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis to prevent pre-term delivery: a randomised trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 110:149–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hogan VK, Culhane JF, Hitti J, Rauh VA, McCollum KF, Agnew KJ (2007) Relative performance of three methods for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis during pregnancy. Matern Child Health J 11:532–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ, Wilson JD (1999) Influence of bacterial vaginosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: cohort study. BMJ 319:220–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison C, Pearson J (1994) Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ 308:295–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McGregor JA, French JI, Parker R, Draper D, Patterson E, Jones W et al (1995) Prevention of premature birth by screening and treatment for common genital tract infections: results of a prospective controlled evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:157–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Spiegel CA, Amsel R, Holmes KK (1983) Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid. J Clin Microbiol 18:170–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwebke JR, Hillier SL, Sobel JD, McGregor JA, Sweet RL (1996) Validity of the vaginal gram stain for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 88:573–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Landers DV, Wiesenfeld HC, Heine RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL (2004) Predictive value of the clinical diagnosis of lower genital tract infection in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1004–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL (1991) Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 29:297–301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Menard JP, Mazouni C, Salem-Cherif I, Fenollar F, Raoult D, Boubli L et al (2010) High vaginal concentrations of Atopobium vaginae and Gardnerella vaginalis in women undergoing preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol 115:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Menard JP, Fenollar F, Henry M, Bretelle F, Raoult D (2008) Molecular quantification of Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae loads to predict bacterial vaginosis. Clin Infect Dis 47:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker VL, Luke B, Brown MB, Alvero R, Frattarelli JL, Usadi R et al (2010) Multivariate analysis of factors affecting probability of pregnancy and live birth with in vitro fertilization: an analysis of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Fertil Steril 94:1410–1416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moore DE, Soules MR, Klein NA, Fujimoto VY, Agnew KJ, Eschenbach DA (2000) Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 74:1118–1124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. van Os HC, Roozenburg BJ, Janssen-Caspers HA, Leerentveld RA, Scholtes MC, Zeilmaker GH et al (1992) Vaginal disinfection with povidon iodine and the outcome of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 7:349–350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liversedge NH, Turner A, Horner PJ, Keay SD, Jenkins JM, Hull MG (1999) The influence of bacterial vaginosis on in-vitro fertilization and embryo implantation during assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod 14:2411–2415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Eckert LO, Moore DE, Patton DL, Agnew KJ, Eschenbach DA (2003) Relationship of vaginal bacteria and inflammation with conception and early pregnancy loss following in-vitro fertilization. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 11:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Daya S, Gunby JL (2004) Luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004830. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD004830

  23. Menard JP, Mazouni C, Fenollar F, Raoult D, Boubli L, Bretelle F (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative real-time PCR assay versus clinical and Gram stain identification of bacterial vaginosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:1547–1552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Martius J, Krohn MA, Hillier SL, Stamm WE, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA (1988) Relationships of vaginal Lactobacillus species, cervical Chlamydia trachomatis, and bacterial vaginosis to preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol 71:89–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pastore LM, Royce RA, Jackson TP, Thorp JM Jr, Savitz DA, Kreaden US (1999) Association between bacterial vaginosis and fetal fibronectin at 24–29 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol 93:117–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kekki M, Kurki T, Pelkonen J, Kurkinen-Räty M, Cacciatore B, Paavonen J (2001) Vaginal clindamycin in preventing preterm birth and peripartal infections in asymptomatic women with bacterial vaginosis: a randomized, controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 97:643–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Eriksson K, Adolfsson A, Forsum U, Larsson PG (2010) The prevalence of BV in the population on the Åland Islands during a 15-year period. APMIS 118:903–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gustafsson RJ, Ahrné S, Jeppsson B, Benoni C, Olsson C, Stjernquist M et al (2011) The Lactobacillus flora in vagina and rectum of fertile and postmenopausal healthy Swedish women. BMC Womens Health 25:11–17

    Google Scholar 

  29. Srinivasan S, Liu C, Mitchell CM, Fiedler TL, Thomas KK, Agnew KJ et al (2010) Temporal variability of human vaginal bacteria and relationship with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 5(4):e10197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fredricks DN (2011) Molecular methods to describe the spectrum and dynamics of the vaginal microbiota. Anaerobe 17:191–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fanchin R, Harmas A, Benaoudia F, Lundkvist U, Olivennes F, Frydman R (1998) Microbial flora of the cervix assessed at the time of embryo transfer adversely affects in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 70:866–870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Donders GG, Bosmans E, Dekeersmaecker A, Vereecken A, Van Bulck B, Spitz B (2000) Pathogenesis of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:872–878

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Leitich H, Kiss H (2007) Asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis and intermediate flora as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:375–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ness RB, Hillier SL, Richter HE, Soper DE, Stamm C, McGregor J et al (2002) Douching in relation to bacterial vaginosis, lactobacilli, and facultative bacteria in the vagina. Obstet Gynecol 100:765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mijac VD, Dukić SV, Opavski NZ, Dukić MK, Ranin LT (2006) Hydrogen peroxide producing lactobacilli in women with vaginal infections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 129:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Vincent Pradel, MD, PhD for his precious advice concerning the statistical analysis and Stephanie Junoy for her technical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Courbiere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mangot-Bertrand, J., Fenollar, F., Bretelle, F. et al. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: impact on IVF outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32, 535–541 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1770-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-012-1770-z

Keywords

Navigation