Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Incisional hernia after robotic single-site cholecystectomy: a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Robotic LaparoEndoscopic Single-Site Surgery Cholecystectomy has been performed for 5 years using a dedicated platform (da Vinci® Single-Site®) with the da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). While short-term feasibility has been described, long-term assessment of this method is currently outstanding. The aim of this study was to assess long-term parietal complications of this technique.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients operated between 2011 and 2013 were evaluated. Parietal incision was assessed with ultrasonography and patients screened for residual pain from scar tissue. Demographic and perioperative data were also collected.

Results

We evaluated 48 patients [38 female, 79.2%; median age 49 years (range: 24–81 years)]; mean BMI 25.9 kg/m2 [±SD 4.1 kg/m2]. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 25–46 months), six incisional hernias (two patients had a positive echography but a negative clinical examination) were found (12.5%, 95% CI 7.5–30.2), and two patients had a surgical repair. The overall rate of incisional hernia was 16.7% (95% CI 7.5–30.2). Residual pain was observed in 5 of 48 patients.

Conclusion

This preliminary study suggests that a clinically significant rate of incisional hernias can occur after R-LESS-C. Larger studies comparing R-LESS-C to alternative methods with long-term follow-up are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LESS:

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

LESS-C:

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery cholecystectomy

R-LESS:

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

R-LESS-C:

Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery cholecystectomy

ML-C:

Multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BMI:

Body mass index

TOT:

Total operative time

COPD:

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

ASA:

American society of anesthesiologists

CAD:

Coronary artery disease

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Minimally invasive necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:113–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Charara F, Morel P (2009) Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 33:1015–1019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Single port totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Re: single incision total extraperitoneal (one SITE) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a single access port device, B. P. Jacob et al. (2009). Hernia 2009(13):667–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy: case report. Surg Endosc 23:1667–1670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12:61–65

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2293–2304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pan M-X, Jiang Z-S, Cheng Y et al (2013) Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 19:394–398

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Madureira FAV, Manso JEF, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias ACG (2013) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abd Ellatif ME, Askar WA, Abbas AE et al (2013) Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 27:1896–1906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P et al (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepat Biliary Pancreat Sci 21:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F (2011) Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 15(12):2182–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Balaphas A, Hagen ME, Buchs NC, et al. (2012) Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS

  17. Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 14:490–497

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO et al (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Agaba EA, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 18:204–210

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Oehlenschläger J et al (2015) No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:3239–3245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101:51–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cristaudi A, Matthey-Gié M-L, Demartines N, Christoforidis D (2014) Prospective assessment of trocar-specific morbidity in laparoscopy. World J Surg 38:3089–3096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. den Hartog D, Dur AHM, Kamphuis AGA, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2009) Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia 13:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK (2014) Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg 218:363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AGM (2012) Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study. Hernia 16:53–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Singh P, Battersby N, Marriott P, Pinkney T (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 17:445–455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fischer JP, Basta MN, Wink JD, Krishnan NM, Kovach SJ (2015) Cost-utility analysis of the use of prophylactic mesh augmentation compared with primary fascial suture repair in patients at high risk for incisional hernia. Surgery 158:700–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN, et al. (2015) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg.

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Christophe Combescure for statistical support.

Authors contributions

AB, NCB, SPN, LHB, and PM designed the project. AB, AZ, and GV acquired the echography data. AB, AZ, and MKJ acquired the clinical data. AB, NCB, SPN, MEH, AZ, MKJ, GV, LHB, and PM contributed to the writing of the manuscript and its critical revision. AB, NCB, SPN, MEH, AZ, MKJ, GV, LHB, and PM approved the final version.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Balaphas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AB declares no conflict of interest. MH declares conflict of interest not directly related to the submitted work. NB declares no conflict of interest. SN declares no conflict of interest. AZ declares no conflict of interest. MJ declares no conflict of interest. LB declares no conflict of interest. GV declares no conflict of interest. PM declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Diagnostic procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Human and animal rights

This study was approved by our institutional review board and national research committee.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Balaphas, A., Buchs, N.C., Naiken, S.P. et al. Incisional hernia after robotic single-site cholecystectomy: a pilot study. Hernia 21, 697–703 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1621-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1621-z

Keywords

Navigation