Abstract
Purpose
Robotic LaparoEndoscopic Single-Site Surgery Cholecystectomy has been performed for 5 years using a dedicated platform (da Vinci® Single-Site®) with the da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). While short-term feasibility has been described, long-term assessment of this method is currently outstanding. The aim of this study was to assess long-term parietal complications of this technique.
Methods
In this retrospective study, patients operated between 2011 and 2013 were evaluated. Parietal incision was assessed with ultrasonography and patients screened for residual pain from scar tissue. Demographic and perioperative data were also collected.
Results
We evaluated 48 patients [38 female, 79.2%; median age 49 years (range: 24–81 years)]; mean BMI 25.9 kg/m2 [±SD 4.1 kg/m2]. After a median follow-up of 39 months (range: 25–46 months), six incisional hernias (two patients had a positive echography but a negative clinical examination) were found (12.5%, 95% CI 7.5–30.2), and two patients had a surgical repair. The overall rate of incisional hernia was 16.7% (95% CI 7.5–30.2). Residual pain was observed in 5 of 48 patients.
Conclusion
This preliminary study suggests that a clinically significant rate of incisional hernias can occur after R-LESS-C. Larger studies comparing R-LESS-C to alternative methods with long-term follow-up are necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LESS:
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
- LESS-C:
-
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery cholecystectomy
- R-LESS:
-
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
- R-LESS-C:
-
Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery cholecystectomy
- ML-C:
-
Multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- BMI:
-
Body mass index
- TOT:
-
Total operative time
- COPD:
-
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- ASA:
-
American society of anesthesiologists
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
References
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Minimally invasive necrosectomy for infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 36:113–119
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016
Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs N, Ostermann S, Charara F, Morel P (2009) Single port access laparoscopic cholecystectomy (with video). World J Surg 33:1015–1019
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Single port totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Re: single incision total extraperitoneal (one SITE) laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using a single access port device, B. P. Jacob et al. (2009). Hernia 2009(13):667–668
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2009) Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic intracorporeal anastomosis for gastrojejunostomy: case report. Surg Endosc 23:1667–1670
Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2010) Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease. Colorectal Dis 12:61–65
Bucher P, Pugin F, Buchs NC, Ostermann S, Morel P (2011) Randomized clinical trial of laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 98:1695–1702
Arezzo A, Scozzari G, Famiglietti F, Passera R, Morino M (2013) Is single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy safe? Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2293–2304
Pan M-X, Jiang Z-S, Cheng Y et al (2013) Single-incision vs three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 19:394–398
Madureira FAV, Manso JEF, Madureira Fo D, Iglesias ACG (2013) Randomized clinical study for assessment of incision characteristics and pain associated with LESS versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 27:1009–1015
Jørgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T (2014) Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 101:347–355
Abd Ellatif ME, Askar WA, Abbas AE et al (2013) Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 27:1896–1906
Morel P, Buchs NC, Iranmanesh P et al (2014) Robotic single-site cholecystectomy. J Hepat Biliary Pancreat Sci 21:18–25
Marks JM, Phillips MS, Tacchino R et al (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 216:1037–1047
Morel P, Hagen ME, Bucher P, Buchs NC, Pugin F (2011) Robotic single-port cholecystectomy using a new platform: initial clinical experience. J Gastrointest Surg 15(12):2182–2186
Balaphas A, Hagen ME, Buchs NC, et al. (2012) Robotic laparoendoscopy single site surgery: a transdisciplinary review. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery: MRCAS
Bunting DM (2010) Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 14:490–497
Weiss HG, Brunner W, Biebl MO et al (2014) Wound complications in 1145 consecutive transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic procedures. Ann Surg 259:89–95
Agaba EA, Rainville H, Ikedilo O, Vemulapali P (2014) Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery. JSLS 18:204–210
Christoffersen MW, Brandt E, Oehlenschläger J et al (2015) No difference in incidence of port-site hernia and chronic pain after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a nationwide prospective, matched cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:3239–3245
Fink C, Baumann P, Wente MN et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy. Br J Surg 101:51–54
Cristaudi A, Matthey-Gié M-L, Demartines N, Christoforidis D (2014) Prospective assessment of trocar-specific morbidity in laparoscopy. World J Surg 38:3089–3096
den Hartog D, Dur AHM, Kamphuis AGA, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW (2009) Comparison of ultrasonography with computed tomography in the diagnosis of incisional hernias. Hernia 13:45–48
Baucom RB, Beck WC, Holzman MD, Sharp KW, Nealon WH, Poulose BK (2014) Prospective evaluation of surgeon physical examination for detection of incisional hernias. J Am Coll Surg 218:363–366
Bloemen A, van Dooren P, Huizinga BF, Hoofwijk AGM (2012) Comparison of ultrasonography and physical examination in the diagnosis of incisional hernia in a prospective study. Hernia 16:53–57
Bhangu A, Fitzgerald JE, Singh P, Battersby N, Marriott P, Pinkney T (2013) Systematic review and meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh placement for prevention of incisional hernia following midline laparotomy. Hernia 17:445–455
Fischer JP, Basta MN, Wink JD, Krishnan NM, Kovach SJ (2015) Cost-utility analysis of the use of prophylactic mesh augmentation compared with primary fascial suture repair in patients at high risk for incisional hernia. Surgery 158:700–711
Fischer JP, Basta MN, Mirzabeigi MN, et al. (2015) A risk model and cost analysis of incisional hernia after elective, abdominal surgery based upon 12,373 cases: the case for targeted prophylactic intervention. Ann Surg.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Christophe Combescure for statistical support.
Authors contributions
AB, NCB, SPN, LHB, and PM designed the project. AB, AZ, and GV acquired the echography data. AB, AZ, and MKJ acquired the clinical data. AB, NCB, SPN, MEH, AZ, MKJ, GV, LHB, and PM contributed to the writing of the manuscript and its critical revision. AB, NCB, SPN, MEH, AZ, MKJ, GV, LHB, and PM approved the final version.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
AB declares no conflict of interest. MH declares conflict of interest not directly related to the submitted work. NB declares no conflict of interest. SN declares no conflict of interest. AZ declares no conflict of interest. MJ declares no conflict of interest. LB declares no conflict of interest. GV declares no conflict of interest. PM declares no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
Diagnostic procedures were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Human and animal rights
This study was approved by our institutional review board and national research committee.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balaphas, A., Buchs, N.C., Naiken, S.P. et al. Incisional hernia after robotic single-site cholecystectomy: a pilot study. Hernia 21, 697–703 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1621-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-017-1621-z