Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This retrospective chart analysis reports and assesses the long-term (beyond 10 years) safety and efficiency of a single institution’s experience in 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repairs (LIVHR), defending the principle of the suturing defect (augmentation repair concept) prior to laparoscopic reinforcement with a composite mesh (IPOM Plus). This study aims to prove the feasibility and validity of IPOM Plus repair, among other concepts, as a well-justified treatment of incisional or ventral hernias, rendering a good long-term outcome result.

Methods

A single institution’s systematic retrospective review of 1326 LIVHR was conducted between the years 2000 and 2014. A standardized technique of routine closure of the defect prior to the intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) reinforcement was performed in all patients. The standardized technique of “defect closure” by laparoscopy approximating the linea alba under physiological tension was assigned by either the transparietal U reverse interrupted stitches or the extracorporeal closure in larger defects. All patients benefited from the implant Parietex composite® mesh through an Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh placement with transfacial suturing.

Results

LIVHR was performed on 1326 patients, 52.57 % female and 47.43 % male. The majority of our patients were young (mean age 52.19 years) and obese (average BMI 32.57 kg/m2). The mean operating time was 70 min and hospital stay 2 days, with a mean follow-up of 78 months. On the overall early complications of 5.78 %, we achieved over time the elimination of the dead space by routine closure of the defect, thus reducing seroma formation to 2.56 %, with a low risk of infection <1 %. Post-op sepsis occurred in only nine cases. Three secondary serosal breakdowns and two late perforations were re-operated, and three diabetic patients had infected hematomas, necessitating mesh removal. Through technical improvement in the suturing concept and our growing experience, we managed to reduce the incidence of transient pain to a low acceptable rate of 3.24 % (VAS 5–7) that decreased to 2.56 % on a chronic pain stage, which is comparable to the literature. On the overall rate of late complications of 10.74 %, we noticed also that by reducing the dead space, the chronic pain, skin bulging, and rate of recurrence were reduced to, respectively, 2.56, 1.50, and 4.72 %. One case of mortality was due to a tracheal stenosis, responsible for an acute respiratory syndrome. On a second-look follow-up of 126 patients (9.5 %), 45.23 % were adhesion free, 42.06 % had minor adhesions classified as Müller I, and 12.69 % had serosal adhesions classified as Müller II.

Conclusion

Our long series confirms the unexpected high rate of feasibility in the suturing concept or augmentation technique, and confers additional benefits to the conventional advantages of LIVHR in terms of reducing the overall morbidity, with a low rate of recurrences. Based on our experience and study, the current best indications for a successful LIVHR procedure should be tailored upon the limitations of the defect’s width and proper patient selection, to restore adequately the optimal functionality of the abdominal muscles and provide better functional and cosmetic outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pierce RA, Spitler JA, Frisella MM, Mathews BD, Brunt LM (2007) Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual. Surg Endosc 21(3):378–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, McLead RS, Okrainec A (2009) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh. Br J Surg 96(8):851–856. doi:10.1002/bjs.6668

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sajid MS, Bokhari SA, Mallick AS, Cheek E, Bink MK (2009) Laparoscopic versus open repair: a meta-analysis. Am J Surg 197(1):64–72. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.12.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, Zhou H, Chai Y, Cao C, Jin K, Hu Z (2014) Laparoscopic versus open incisional and ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 38(9):2233–2240. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2578-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kukleta J, Chelala E, Chowbey (2014) “Bridging”, “Augmentation” and reconstruction of the linea alba: closure of the defect before IPOM. Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)-part 1. Surg Endosc 28:2–29. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3170-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, Dessily M, Alle JL (2003) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: preliminary results. Hernia 7(4):191–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leblanc K (2001) The critical technical aspects of laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias. Am Surg 67(8):809–812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heniford BT, Park A, Ramshaw BJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias: nine years experience with 850 consecutive hernias. Ann Surg 238:391–400

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Baccari P, Nifosi J, Ghirardelli L, Standacher C (2012) Short and midterm outcome after laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernia. Hernia 17(5):567–572. doi:10.1007/s10029-012-1026-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrari G, Bertaglio C, Magistro C, Girardi V, Mazzola M, Dilernia S, Pugliese R (2013) Laparoscopic repair for recurrent incisional hernias: a single institution experience of 10 years. Hernia 17(5):573–580. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1098-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Banerjee A, Beck C, Narula VK, Linn J, Noria S, Zagel B, Mikami DJ (2012) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: does primary repair in addition to placement of mesh decrease recurrence? SurgEndosc 26(5):1264–1268. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2024-3

    Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin ME, Gonzalez JJ, Glass J, Manjarrez A (2004) Laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair: 11-year experience. Hernia 8(1):23–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ammaturo C, Bassi UA, Bassi G (2010) Outcomes of the open mesh repair of large incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh: our experience with 100 cases. Updates Surg 62(1):55–61. doi:10.1007/s13304-010-0002-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dietz UA, Winkler MS, Hartel RW, Fleischhacker A, Wiegering A, Isbert C et al (2012) Importance of recurrence rating, morphology, hernia gap size, and risk factors, in ventral and incisional hernia classification. Hernia 18(1):19–30. doi:10.1007/s10029-012-0999-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chelala E, Thomas M, Tatete B, Lemye AC, Dessily M, Alle JL (2007) The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: midterm analysis of 400 cases. Surg Endosc 21(3):391–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Muysoms FE, Campanelli G, Champanlf CG, Chelala E, Dietz UA et al (2009) Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias. Hernia 13(4):407–414. doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0518-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Raftopoulos I et al (2002) Outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in correlation with obesity, type of hernia, and hernia size. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12(6):425–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ching SS, Sarela AI, Dexter SP, Hayden JD, McMahen MJ (2008) Comparison of early outcomes for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair between non obese and morbidity obese patient populations. Surg Endosc 22(10):2244–2250. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0039-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chelala E, Debardemaecker Y, Elias B, Charara F, Dessily M, Alle JL (2010) Eighty five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis. Hernia 14(2):123–129. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0637-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Avci C, Fourtanier G, Avtan L (2011) Video-atlas book tome III incisional hernia: ventral and incisional hernia: the suturing concept, Chelala E. France, pp 163–168, ISBN: 978-2-8178-0145-2

  21. Palanivelu C, Jani KV, Senthilnathan P et al (2007) Laparoscopic sutured closure with mesh reinforcement of incisional hernias. Hernia 11(3):223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orenstein SB, Dumeer JL, Monteagudo J et al (2011) Outcomes of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with routine defect closure using ‘‘shoelacing’’ technique. Surg Endosc 25(5):1452–1457. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1413-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma A, Mehrotra M, Khullar R, Soni V, Baijal M, Chowbey PK (2011) Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: a single centre experience of 1242 patients over a period of 13 years. Hernia 15(2):131–139. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0747-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chevrel JP, Rath AM (2000) Classification of incisional hernias of the abdominal wall. Hernia 4:7–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bansal VK, MisraM Kumar S, Rao K, Singhal P, Goswami A, Guleria S, Arora MK, Chabra A (2011) A prospective randomized study comparing suture mesh fixation versus tacker mesh fixation for laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias. Surg Endosc 25(5):1431–1438. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1410-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Palanivelu C, Rangarajan M, Parthasarathi R et al (2008) Laparoscopic repair of suprapubic incisional hernias: suturing and intraperitoneal composite mesh onlay. A retrospective study. Hernia 12(3):251–256. doi:10.1007/s10029-008-0337-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kurmann A, Visth E, Candinas D et al (2011) Long term follow up of open and laparoscopic repair of large incisional hernias. World J Surg 35(2):297–301. doi:10.1007/s00268-010-0874-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Saber AA, Rao AJ, Itawi EA, Elgamal MH, Martinez RL (2008) Occult ventral hernia defects: a common finding during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Am J Surg 195(4):471–473. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koehler RH, Begos D, Berger D et al (2003) Minimal adhesions to epTFE mesh after laparoscopic ventral incisional hernia repair: reoperative findings in 65 cases. Zentralbl Chir 128(8):625–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bellon JM, Garcia-Carranza A, Jurado F et al (2001) Peritoneal regeneration after implant of a composit prosthesis in the abdominal wall. World J Surg 25(2):147–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen MJ (2009) Polyester-based mesh for ventral hernia repair: is it safe? Am J Surg 197(3):353–359. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rios A, Rodriguez JM, Mumitz V, Alcaraz P, Perez D, Parilla P (2001) Factors that affect recurrence after incisional herniorrhaphy with prothetic material. Eur J Surg 167(11):855–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moreno-Egea A, Bustos JA, Girela E, Aguayo-Albasimi JL (2010) Long term results of laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias using an intraperitoneal composite mesh. Surg Endosc 24(2):359–365. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0573-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramshaw BJ, Strait P, Schwab J, Mason EM, Wilson RA, Duncan TD, Miller J, Lucas GW, Promes J (1999) Comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral herniorrhaphy. Am Surg 65(9):827–832

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Leblanc K, Elieson M III, Corder J (2007) Enterotomy and mortality rates of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a review of the literature. JSLS 11(4):408–414

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Carter P, Leblanc K (2013) Complications of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Management of Abdominal hernias, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-84882-877-3_22

    Google Scholar 

  37. Tsirline VB, Belyansky I, Heniford TB (2013) Complications of laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair. Management of abdominal hernias, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-1-84882-877-3_25

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wassenaar E et al (2010) Mesh fixation method and and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques. Surg Endosc 24(6):1296–1302. doi:10.1007/s00464-009-0763-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Beldi G, Wagner M, Bruegger LE, Kurmann A, Candivas D (2011) Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation. Surg Endosc 25(3):749–755. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1246-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ericksen JR et al (2009) Pain, quality of life and recovery after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Hernia 13(1):13–21. doi:10.1007/s10029-008-0414-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zeichen MS, Lujan HJ, Mata WN, Maciel VH, Lee D, Jorge I, Plasencia G, Gomez E, Hernandez AM (2013) Closure versus non-closure of hernia defect during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh. Hernia 17(5):589–596. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1115-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wassenaar EB, Shoenmaeckers E, Raymakers J, Rakic S (2009) Recurrences after laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernia: lessons learned from 505 repairs. Surg Endosc 23(4):825–832. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0146-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Morena-Egea A, Carillo-Alcaraz A, Aguayo-Albassimi JL (2012) Is the outcome of laparoscopic hernia repair affected by defect size? A prospective study. Am J Surg 203(1):87–94. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lambrecht J (2011) Overlap coefficient for the relationship between mesh size and defect size in laparoscopic ventral hernia surgery. Hernia 15(4):473–474. doi:10.1007/s10029-011-0817-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nguyen DH, Nguyen MT, Askenasy EP, Kaol S, Liang MK (2014) Primary facial closure with laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: systematic review. World J Surg 38(12):3097–3104. doi:10.1007/s00268-014-2722-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Iqbal CW, Pham TH, Joseph A, Mai J et al (2007) Long term outcomes of 254 complex incisional hernia repairs using the modified Rives–Stoppa technique. World J Surg 31(12):2398–2404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Conze J, Prescher A, Kisielinski K, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2005) Technical consideration for subxiphoidal incisional hernia repair. Hernia 9(1):84–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Bageacu S et al (2002) Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 159 patients. Surg Endosc 16(2):345–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nguyen SQ, Divino CM, Buch KE, Schnur J, Weber KJ, Katz LB, Reiner MA, Aldoroty RA, Herron DM (2008) Postoperative pain after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a prospective comparison of sutures versus tacks. JSLS 12(2):113–116

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lyons C, Joseph R, Salas N, Reardon P, Bass B, Dunkin B (2012) Mesh fixation with a barbed anchor suture results in significantly less strangulation of the abdominal wall. Surg Endosc 26(5):1254–1257. doi:10.1007/s00464-011-2014-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Clapp ML, Hicks SC, Awad SS, Liang MK (2012) Trans-cutaneous closure of central defects (TCCD) in laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs (LVHR). World J Surg 37(1):42–51. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1810-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Costi R, Randone B, Cinieri GF, Sarli L, Violi V (2009) Early strangulated recurrence of incisional hernia after laparoscopic repair: an old complication for a new technique. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 19(3):397–400. doi:10.1089/lap.2008.0094

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Booth JH, Garvey PB, Baumann DP, Selber JC, Nguyen AT, Clemens MW, Liu J, Butler CE (2013) Primary fascial closure with mesh reinforcement is superior to bridged mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 217(6):999–1009. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Agarwal BB, Agarwal S, Mahajan KC (2009) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: innovative anatomical closure, mesh insertion without 10 mm transmyofascial port, and atraumatic mesh fixation: a preliminary experience of a new technique. Surg Endosc 23(4):900–905. doi:10.1007/s00464-008-0159-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sharma D, Jindal V, Pathania OP, Thomas S (2010) Novel technique for closure of defect in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. J Min Access Surg 6(3):86–88. doi:10.4103/0972-9941.68580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Jorge I, Maciel VH, Lujan H (2011) New technique for fascial defect approximation during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh. In: Abstract-emerging technology session SAGES annual meeting

  57. Stoikes N, Quaserbarth M, Brunt LM (2013) Hybrid ventral hernia repair: technique and results. Hernia 17:627–632. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1092-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair impaired with time? A population based analysis. Ann Surg 237(1):129–135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

EC and JLA declare being advisor educational surgeons to Covidien. All authors have no conflict of interest or financial ties to report for this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHU Tivoli, Avenue Max Buset, 34, 7100, La Louvière, Belgium

    E. Chelala, H. Baraké, J. Estievenart, M. Dessily, F. Charara & J. L. Allé

Authors
  1. E. Chelala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Baraké
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. Estievenart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Dessily
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. F. Charara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. L. Allé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Chelala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chelala, E., Baraké, H., Estievenart, J. et al. Long-term outcomes of 1326 laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair with the routine suturing concept: a single institution experience. Hernia 20, 101–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-015-1397-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation