Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pitfalls in retromuscular mesh repair for incisional hernia: The importance of the “fatty triangle”

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Open retromuscular mesh repair has become a standard procedure in incisional hernia repair. This technique led to a significant decrease of recurrences. Recurrences after this technique typically occur at the upper mesh border and are a result of the technical complexity of reaching the postulated underlay of 5 cm in the region of the linea alba. We performed an anatomical study in human corpses to investigate the abdominal wall with its different structures, with emphasis on the overlap of the mesh under the linea alba. The overlap can be achieved by incision of the posterior lamina of the rectus sheath, on both sides close to the linea alba. The incision opens the preperitoneal space and appears in the shape of a “fatty triangle”. The anterior lamina of the rectus sheath above the hernia defect remains intact and facilitates a sufficient thrust bearing for a retromuscular mesh implantation. Knowledge of the anatomy and preparation of the “fatty triangle” enables a mesh positioning according to the principles of retromuscular mesh repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J (1987) Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg 74:738–741

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2002) Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 73:474–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer C, Liersch T, Kley C, Flosman M, Suss M, Siemer A, Becker H (2003) Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery. A comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs. Chirurg 74:638–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, de Lange DC, Braaksma MM, IJzermans JN, Boelhouwer RU, de Vries BC, Salu MK, Wereldsma JC, Bruijninckx CM, Jeekel J (2000) A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. N Engl J Med 343:392–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Paul A, Lefering R, Kohler L, Eypasch E (1997) Current practice of incisional hernia reconstruction in Germany. Zentralbl Chir 122:859–861

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schumpelick V, Conze J, Klinge U (1996) Preperitoneal mesh-plasty in incisional hernia repair. A comparative retrospective study of 272 operated incisional hernias. Chirurg 67:1028–1035

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bencini L, Sanchez LJ, Scatizzi M, Farsi M, Boffi B, Moretti R (2003) Laparoscopic treatment of ventral hernias: prospective evaluation. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:16–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ladurner R, Trupka A, Schmidbauer S, Hallfeldt K (2001) The use of an underlay polypropylene mesh in complicated incisional hernias: successful French surgical technique. Minerva Chir 56:111–117

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin-Duce A, Noguerales F, Villeta R, Hernandez P, Lozano O, Keller J, Granell J (2001) Modifications to Rives technique for midline incisional hernia repair. Hernia 5:70–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McLanahan D, King LT, Weems C, Novotney M, Gibson K (1997) Retrorectus prosthetic mesh repair of midline abdominal hernia. Am J Surg 173:445–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schumpelick V, Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, Stumpf M (2002) Retromuscular mesh repair for ventral incision hernia in Germany. Chirurg 73:888–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Toniato A, Pagetta C, Bernante P, Piotto A, Pelizzo MR (2002) Incisional hernia treatment with progressive pneumoperitoneum and retromuscular prosthetic hernioplasty. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:246–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright BE, Niskanen BD, Peterson DJ, Ney AL, Odland MD, VanCamp J, Zera RT, Rodriguez JL (2002) Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: are there comparative advantages over traditional methods of repair? Am Surg 68:291–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Klinge U, Si ZY, Zheng H, Schumpelick V, Bhardwaj RS, Klosterhalfen B (2000) Abnormal collagen I to III distribution in the skin of patients with incisional hernia. Eur Surg Res 32:43–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosch R, Junge K, Knops M, Lynen P, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2003) Analysis of collagen-interacting proteins in patients with incisional hernias. Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:427–432

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rizk NN (1991) The arcuate line of the rectus sheath—does it exist? J Anat 175:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yuan Lung-Chin (1965) Constitution of the rectus sheath. Acta anatomica Sinica 8:234–238

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mempel W (1968) Zone, not Linea semilunaris! Investigation of the so called Linea semicircularis Douglasi. Morph Jahrb 109:353–375

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, Goldlust D, Zhang J, Chevrel JP (1996) The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study. Surg Radiol Anat 18:281–288

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Askar OM (1984) Aponeurotic hernias. Recent observations upon paraumbilical and epigastric hernias. Surg Clin North Am 64:315–333

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Axer H, Keyserlingk DG, Prescher A (2001) Collagen fibers in linea alba and rectus sheaths. I. General scheme and morphological aspects. J Surg Res 96:127–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Axer H, von Keyserlingk DG, Prescher A (2001) Collagen fibers in linea alba and rectus sheaths. J Surg Res. 96:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lowe JB, Garza JR, Bowman JL, Rohrich RJ, Strodel WE (2000) Endoscopically assisted “components separation” for closure of abdominal wall defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:720–729

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur J Surg 164:965–969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schumpelick V, Arlt G, Schlachetzki A, Klosterhalfen B (1997) Chronic inguinal pain after transperitoneal mesh implantation. Case report of net shrinkage. Chirurg 68:1297–1300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 15–21

  27. Langer C, Kley C, Neufang T, Liersch T, Becker H (2001) Problem of recurrent incisional hernia after mesh repair of the abdominal wall. Chirurg 72:927–933

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Anthony T, Bergen PC, Kim LT, Henderson M, Fahey T, Rege RV, Turnage RH (2000) Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy. World J Surg 24:95–100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rios A, Rodriguez JM, Munitiz V, Alcaraz P, Perez D, Parrilla P (2001) Factors that affect recurrence after incisional herniorrhaphy with prosthetic material. Eur J Surg 167:855–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T (2003) Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis. Ann Surg 237:129–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgical Department, Rhenish Westphalian Technical University, Pauwelsstraße 30, , 52074, Aachen, Germany

    J. Conze, U. Klinge, M. Saklak & V. Schumpelick

  2. Institute for Anatomy, Rhenish Westphalian Technical University , Aachen, Germany

    A. Prescher

Authors
  1. J. Conze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Prescher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. Klinge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Saklak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. V. Schumpelick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Conze.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conze, J., Prescher, A., Klinge, U. et al. Pitfalls in retromuscular mesh repair for incisional hernia: The importance of the “fatty triangle”. Hernia 8, 255–259 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0235-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-004-0235-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation