Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are known to have increased risks of femoral neck and vertebral fractures, although their bone mineral density (BMD) is normal or even slightly increased compared to non-DM controls. This observation suggests that bone fragility not reflected by BMD, possibly deterioration of bone quality, may participate in their fracture risks. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), unlike BMD, could possibly evaluate bone quality, especially the microarchitecture, and therefore may be useful for assessing fracture risk in T2DM. To test this hypothesis, we measured calcaneal QUS as well as BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and 1/3 radius in 96 women (mean age 66.6 years old) and 99 men (64.7 years old) with T2DM, and examined their associations with prevalent vertebral fractures (VFs). Calcaneal QUS was performed by CM-200 (Elk Corp., Osaka, Japan), and speed of sound (SOS) values were obtained. BMD was measured by QDR4500 (Hologic, Waltham, MA). In T2DM patients, VFs were found in 33 and 45 subjects in women and men, respectively. When compared between subjects with and without VFs, there were no significant differences in values of SOS or BMD at any site between the groups in either gender. The distribution of SOS as a function of age showed that those with VFs were scattered widely, and there were no SOS thresholds for VFs in either gender. Logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and BMI showed that either SOS or BMD was not significantly associated with the presence of VFs in either gender. These results show that QUS as well as BMD are unable to discriminate T2DM patients with prevalent VFs from those without VFs. It seems necessary to seek other imaging modalities or biochemical markers evaluating bone fragility and fracture risk in T2DM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  1. Janghorbani M, Van Dam RM, Willett WC, Hu FB (2007) Systematic review of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of fracture. Am J Epidemiol 166:495–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vestergaard P (2007) Discrepancies in bone mineral density and fracture risk in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes—a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 18:427–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamamoto M, Yamaguchi T, Yamauchi M, Kaji H, Sugimoto T (2009) Diabetic patients have an increased risk of vertebral fractures independent of BMD or diabetic complications. J Bone Miner Res 24:702–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous (2001) NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy, March 7–29, 2000: highlights of the conference. South Med J 94:569–573

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ashman RB, Corin JD, Turner CH (1987) Elastic properties of cancellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique. J Biomech 20:979–986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ashman RB, Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, Rice JC (1984) A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 17:349–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashman RB, Rho JY, Turner CH (1989) Anatomical variation of orthotropic elastic moduli of the proximal human tibia. J Biomech 22:895–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Buskirk WC, Cowin SC, Ward RN (1981) Ultrasonic measurement of orthotropic elastic constants of bovine femoral bone. J Biomech Eng 103:67–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gluer CC, Wu CY, Genant HK (1993) Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in vitro study. Osteoporos Int 3:185–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholson PH, Haddaway MJ, Davie MW (1994) The dependence of ultrasonic properties on orientation in human vertebral bone. Phys Med Biol 39:1013–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gluer CC, Wu CY, Jergas M, Goldstein SA, Genant HK (1994) Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure. Calcif Tissue Int 55:46–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hans D, Arlot ME, Schott AM, Roux JP, Kotzki PO, Meunier PJ (1995) Do ultrasound measurements on the os calcis reflect more the bone microarchitecture than the bone mass? A two-dimensional histomorphometric study. Bone 16:295–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kishimoto H (1997) Examination of the clinical usefulness of new ultrasonic bone density measurement equipment (in Japanese). Osteoporos Jpn 5:815–817

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takaishi Y, Okamoto Y, Ikeo T, Morii H, Takeda M, Hide K, Arai T, Nonaka K (2005) Correlations between periodontitis and loss of mandibular bone in relation to systemic bone changes in postmenopausal Japanese women. Osteoporos Int 16:1875–1882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vu TT, Nguyen CK, Nguyen TL, Le BM, Le NguyenTrung D, Bui TN, Nakamori M, Kunii D, Sakai T, Yamamoto S (2005) Determining the prevalence of osteoporosis and related factors using quantitative ultrasound in Vietnamese adult women. Am J Epidemiol 161:824–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. CM-100 Multi-Center Study Committee (2003) Normative data and cut-off values for QUS using CM-100 (In Japanese). Osteoporos Jpn 11:129–132

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Genant HK, Stone K (1995) Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 10:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cepollaro C, Gonnelli S, Pondrelli C, Martini S, Montagnani A, Rossi S, Gennari L, Gennari C (1997) The combined use of ultrasound and densitometry in the prediction of vertebral fracture. Br J Radiol 70:691–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartl F, Tyndall A, Kraenzlin M, Bachmeier C, Guckel C, Senn U, Hans D, Theiler R (2002) Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures: results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:321–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kung AW, Luk KD, Chu LW, Tang GW (1999) Quantitative ultrasound and symptomatic vertebral fracture risk in Chinese women. Osteoporos Int 10:456–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ross P, Huang C, Davis J, Imose K, Yates J, Vogel J, Wasnich R (1995) Predicting vertebral deformity using bone densitometry at various skeletal sites and calcaneus ultrasound. Bone 16:325–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauer DC, Ewing SK, Cauley JA, Ensrud KE, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES (2007) Quantitative ultrasound predicts hip and non-spine fracture in men: the MrOS study. Osteoporos Int 18:771–777

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bauer DC, Gluer CC, Cauley JA, Vogt TM, Ensrud KE, Genant HK, Black DM (1997) Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women. A prospective study. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 157:629–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fujiwara S, Sone T, Yamazaki K, Yoshimura N, Nakatsuka K, Masunari N, Fujita S, Kushida K, Fukunaga M (2005) Heel bone ultrasound predicts non-spine fracture in Japanese men and women. Osteoporos Int 16:2107–2112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hans D, Dargent-Molina P, Schott AM, Sebert JL, Cormier C, Kotzki PO, Delmas PD, Pouilles JM, Breart G, Meunier PJ (1996) Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study. Lancet 348:511–514

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Huopio J, Kroger H, Honkanen R, Jurvelin J, Saarikoski S, Alhava E (2004) Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women. Osteoporos Int 15:190–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV, Davis KA, Masharani U, Majumdar S, Link TM (2010) High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:5045–5055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Petit MA, Paudel ML, Taylor BC, Hughes JM, Strotmeyer ES, Schwartz AV, Cauley JA, Zmuda JM, Hoffman AR, Ensrud KE, Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Group (2010) Bone mass and strength in older men with type 2 diabetes: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study. J Bone Miner Res 25:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from Division of the Heath for the Elderly, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, and a grant from Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation, Japan.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine 1, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan

    Toru Yamaguchi, Masahiro Yamamoto, Ippei Kanazawa, Mika Yamauchi, Shozo Yano & Toshitsugu Sugimoto

  2. Central Clinical Laboratory, Shimane University Hospital, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan

    Nobuko Tanaka, Eri Nitta, Asako Fukuma, Seiko Uno & Tomoko Sho-no

Authors
  1. Toru Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Masahiro Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ippei Kanazawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mika Yamauchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shozo Yano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nobuko Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Eri Nitta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Asako Fukuma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Seiko Uno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tomoko Sho-no
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Toshitsugu Sugimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Yamaguchi.

About this article

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, T., Yamamoto, M., Kanazawa, I. et al. Quantitative ultrasound and vertebral fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Bone Miner Metab 29, 626–632 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-011-0265-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-011-0265-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation