Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Methods

We retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared early with delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis by systematically searching Medline and the Cochrane Library for studies published between 1966 and 2003. The outcomes of primary interest were mortality and morbidity.

Results

The ten trials we analyzed comprised 1 014 subjects; 534 were assigned to the early group and 480 assigned to the delayed group. The combined risk difference of mortality appeared to favor open cholecystectomy in the early period (risk difference, −0.02; 95% confidence interval, −0.44 to −0.00), but no differences were found among laparoscopic procedures or among all procedures. The combined risk difference of morbidity showed no differences between the open and laparoscopic procedures. The combined risk difference of the rate of conversion to open surgery showed no differences in the included laparoscopic studies; however, the combined total hospital stay was significantly shorter in the early group than in the delayed group.

Conclusions

There is no advantage to delaying cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis on the basis of outcomes in mortality, morbidity, rate of conversion to open surgery, and mean hospital stay. Thus, early cholecystectomy should be performed for patients with acute cholecystitis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. BD Schirmer SB Edge J Dix MJ Hyser JB Hanks RS Jones (1991) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy: treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis Ann Surg 213 665–76 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6B2cjovFE%3D Occurrence Handle1828141

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. A Cuschieri F Dubois J Mouiel P Mouret H Becker G Buess et al. (1991) ArticleTitleThe European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy Am J Surg 161 385–7 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-B Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6C2MfgvFU%3D Occurrence Handle1825763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. RC Frazee JW Roberts R Symmonds SK Snyder J Hendricks R Smith et al. (1992) ArticleTitleWhat are the contraindications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 164 491–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD2s3msVM%3D Occurrence Handle1443375

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. T Kiviluoto J Siren P Luukkonen E Kivilaakso (1998) ArticleTitleRandomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis Lancet 351 321–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(97)08447-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czhsVOhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9652612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. CF Chandler JS Lane P Ferguson JE Thompson SW Ashley (2000) ArticleTitleProspective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis Am Surg 66 896–900 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktlGgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10993625

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. CM Lo CL Liu ST Fan EC Lai J Wong (1998) ArticleTitleProspective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 227 461–7 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199804000-00001 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3it12qsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9563529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. PB Lai KH Kwong KL Leung SP Kwok AC Chan SC Chung et al. (1998) ArticleTitleRandomized trial of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 85 764–7 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00708.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czjtVaktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9667702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. S Norrby P Herlin T Holmin R Sjodahl C Tagesson (1983) ArticleTitleEarly or delayed cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis? A clinical trial Br J Surg 70 163–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiyC2MvkvFE%3D Occurrence Handle6338991

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. HJ Jarvinen J Hastbacka (1980) ArticleTitleEarly cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized study Ann Surg 191 501–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi%2BC2svhtlM%3D Occurrence Handle6445180

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schaefer D, Barth H, Thon K, Jostarndt L, Maroske D. Early or delayed operation in patients with acute cholecystitis. Results of a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Chir Forum Exp Klin Forsch 1980:149–53

  11. J Lahtinen E Alhava S Aukee (1978) ArticleTitleAcute cholecystitis treated by early and delayed surgery. A controlled clinical trial Scand J Gastroenterol 13 673–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSaD3MvgvFw%3D Occurrence Handle358366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. M Johansson A Thune A Blomqvist L Nelvin L Lundell (2003) ArticleTitleManagement of acute cholecystitis in the laparoscopic era: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial J Gastrointest Surg 7 642–5 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00065-9 Occurrence Handle12850677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. P McArthur A Cuschieri RA Sells R Shields (1975) ArticleTitleControlled clinical trial comparing early with interval cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Br J Surg 62 850–2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSmD28zisVI%3D Occurrence Handle1104043

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. W der Linden H Sunzel (1970) ArticleTitleEarly versus delayed operation for acute cholecystitis. A controlled clinical trial Am J Surg 120 7–13 Occurrence Handle5426869

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. AK Madan S Aliabadi-Wahle D Tesi LM Flint SM Steinberg (2002) ArticleTitleHow early is early laparoscopic treatment of acute cholecystitis? Am J Surg 183 232–6 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(02)00789-4 Occurrence Handle11943117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. TH Liu ET Consorti DW Mercer (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: technical considerations and outcome Semin Laparosc Surg 9 24–31 Occurrence Handle10.1053/slas.2002.32097 Occurrence Handle11979407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. AR Jadad RA Moore D Carroll C Jenkinson DJ Reynolds DJ Gavaghan et al. (1996) ArticleTitleAssessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17 1–12 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymA3cfksFw%3D Occurrence Handle8721797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. RJ Light DB Pilemer (1984) Summing up: the science of reviewing research Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  19. CB Begg M Mazumdar (1994) ArticleTitleOperating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias Biometrics 50 1088–101 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqA3cnlvVM%3D Occurrence Handle7786990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. M Egger G Davey Smith M Schneider C Minder (1997) ArticleTitleBias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test BMJ 315 629–34 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH2MnmtVI%3D Occurrence Handle9310563

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. S Greenland JM Robins (1985) ArticleTitleEstimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data Biometrics 41 55–68 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiqB38nntlM%3D Occurrence Handle4005387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. JL Fleiss (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. R DerSimonian N Laird (1986) ArticleTitleMeta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 177–88 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiC3cvisFI%3D Occurrence Handle3802833

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stata/SE 8.1 for Windows 2003 State TX, USA

  25. DW Rattner C Ferguson AL Warshaw (1993) ArticleTitleFactors associated with successful laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis Ann Surg 217 233–6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1Mbjs1U%3D Occurrence Handle8452401

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. JA Singer RV McKeen (1994) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute or gangrenous cholecystitis Am Surg 60 326–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3MzjsF0%3D Occurrence Handle8161080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. F Chikamori N Kuniyoshi S Shibuya Y Takase (2002) ArticleTitleEarly scheduled laparoscopic cholecystectomy following percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage for patients with acute cholecystitis Surg Endosc 16 1704–7 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00464-002-9004-6 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jis1Citg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12209324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan

    Satoru Shikata

  2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan

    Yoshinori Noguchi

  3. Department of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Tsuguya Fukui

Authors
  1. Satoru Shikata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoshinori Noguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tsuguya Fukui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shikata, S., Noguchi, Y. & Fukui, T. Early Versus Delayed Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Surg Today 35, 553–560 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2998-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-005-2998-3

Key words

Search

Navigation