Abstract
Background
Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) systems have enabled advancements in endoscopy. Deep learning systems, using convolutional neural networks, have allowed for real-time AI-aided detection of polyps with higher sensitivity than the average endoscopist. However, not all endoscopists welcome the advent of AI systems.
Methods
We conducted a survey on the knowledge of AI, perceptions of AI in medicine, and behaviours regarding use of AI-aided colonoscopy, in a single centre 2 months after the implementation of Medtronic’s GI Genius in colonoscopy. We obtained a response rate of 66.7% (16/24) amongst consultant-grade endoscopists. Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate the significance of correlations.
Results
Knowledge of AI varied widely amongst endoscopists. Most endoscopists were optimistic about AI’s capabilities in performing objective administrative and clinical tasks, but reserved about AI providing personalised, empathetic care. 68.8% (n = 11) of endoscopists agreed or strongly agreed that GI Genius should be used as an adjunct in colonoscopy. In analysing the 31.3% (n = 5) of endoscopists who disagreed or were ambivalent about its use, there was no significant correlation with their knowledge or perceptions of AI, but a significant number did not enjoy using the programme (p-value = 0.0128) and did not think it improved the quality of colonoscopy (p-value = 0.033).
Conclusions
Acceptance of AI-aided colonoscopy systems is more related to the endoscopist’s experience with using the programme, rather than general knowledge or perceptions towards AI. Uptake of such systems will rely greatly on how the device is delivered to the end user.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Koh FH, Ladlad J, SKHE Centre, Teo EK, Lin CL, Foo FJ (2022) Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore. Surg Endosc 37:165–171
Chin SE, Wan FT, Ladlad J et al (2023) One-year review of real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy performance. Surg Endosc 37:6402–6407
Mori Y, Neumann H, Misawa M, Kudo SE, Bretthauer M (2021) Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy—now on the market. What’s next? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 36(1):7–11
Lui TKL, Leung WK (2020) Is artificial intelligence the final answer to missed polyps in colonoscopy? World J Gastroenterol 26(35):5248–5255
Attardo S, Chandrasekar VT, Spadaccini M et al (2020) Artificial intelligence technologies for the detection of colorectal lesions: the future is now. World J Gastroenterol 26(37):5606–5616
Ishiyama M, Kudo SE, Misawa M et al (2022) Impact of the clinical use of artificial intelligence-assisted neoplasia detection for colonoscopy: a large-scale prospective, propensity score-matched study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 95(1):155–163
Huang D, Shen J, Hong J et al (2022) Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 37(3):495–506
Hassan C, Wallace MB, Sharma P et al (2020) New artificial intelligence system: first validation study versus experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection. Gut 69(5):799–800
Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R et al (2020) Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 159(2):512-520.e7
Wallace MB, Sharma P, Bhandari P et al (2022) Impact of artificial intelligence on miss rate of colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 163(1):295-304.e295
Mehta N, Harish V, Bilimoria K, Morgado F, Ginsburg S, Law M, Das S (2021) Knowledge of and attitudes on artificial intelligence in healthcare: a provincial survey study of medical students. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.21249830
Li JW, Ang TL (2021) Colonoscopy and artificial intelligence: bridging the gap or a gap needing to be bridged? Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2(2):36–49
Wadhwa V, Alagappan M, Gonzalez A et al (2020) Physician sentiment toward artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopic practice: a survey of US gastroenterologists. Endosc Int Open 8(10):E1379–E1384
Iyanna S, Kaur P, Ractham P, Talwar S, Islam AKMN (2022) Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users? J Bus Res 153:150–161
Hunter SC, Kim B, Mudge A et al (2020) Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: a co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects. BMC Health Serv Res 20(1):573
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Sengkang General Hospital Endoscopy Centre staff and endoscopists who participated in the project: Fung-Joon Foo, Winson J. Tan, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Leonard M. L. Ho, Jia-Lin Ng, Frederick H. Koh, Cheryl Chong, Darius Aw, Kam Juinn Haur, Alvin Y. H. Tan, Choon-Chieh Tan, Baldwin P. M. Yeung, Wai-Keong Wong, Bin-Chet Toh, Jasmine Ladlad, Jason Barco, Koy-Min Chue, Faith Leong, Christopher Kong, Cui-Li Lin, Eng-Kiong Teo, Yi-Kang Ng, Tze-Tong Tey, Marianne A. De-Roza, Jonathan Lum, Xiaoke Li, Jinliang Li, Nazeemah B Mohd-Nor, and Siok-Peng Ng.
Funding
No funding was provided for this study. However, the GI Genius™ Intelligent Endoscopy Module (US-DG-2000309 © 2021 Medtronic) was provided free to the institution during the study period as a form of loan for trial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
All authors participated in the conception of the idea, data collection, writing and manuscript revision. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Frederick H. Koh is a Key-Opinion-Leader for Medtronic for AI in Endoscopy, Asia Pacific Region. Sarah Tham, Eng-Kiong Teo, Cui Li-Lin, Fung-Joon Foo and co-authors within SKH Endoscopy Centre have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Ethical approval
No ethical approval was requested for the writing of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We write this paper as a supplementary qualitative analysis as part of our single institution’s prospective cohort study with Medtronic’s GI Genius—of which two articles on the topic have been published in Surgical Endoscopy, the first by Koh et al. [1] in the July 2022 edition, and the second by Chin et al. [2] in the February 2023 edition.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tham, S., Koh, F.H., SKH Endoscopy Centre. et al. Knowledge, perceptions and behaviours of endoscopists towards the use of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 37, 7395–7400 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10412-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10412-3