Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Knowledge, perceptions and behaviours of endoscopists towards the use of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) systems have enabled advancements in endoscopy. Deep learning systems, using convolutional neural networks, have allowed for real-time AI-aided detection of polyps with higher sensitivity than the average endoscopist. However, not all endoscopists welcome the advent of AI systems.

Methods

We conducted a survey on the knowledge of AI, perceptions of AI in medicine, and behaviours regarding use of AI-aided colonoscopy, in a single centre 2 months after the implementation of Medtronic’s GI Genius in colonoscopy. We obtained a response rate of 66.7% (16/24) amongst consultant-grade endoscopists. Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate the significance of correlations.

Results

Knowledge of AI varied widely amongst endoscopists. Most endoscopists were optimistic about AI’s capabilities in performing objective administrative and clinical tasks, but reserved about AI providing personalised, empathetic care. 68.8% (n = 11) of endoscopists agreed or strongly agreed that GI Genius should be used as an adjunct in colonoscopy. In analysing the 31.3% (n = 5) of endoscopists who disagreed or were ambivalent about its use, there was no significant correlation with their knowledge or perceptions of AI, but a significant number did not enjoy using the programme (p-value = 0.0128) and did not think it improved the quality of colonoscopy (p-value = 0.033).

Conclusions

Acceptance of AI-aided colonoscopy systems is more related to the endoscopist’s experience with using the programme, rather than general knowledge or perceptions towards AI. Uptake of such systems will rely greatly on how the device is delivered to the end user.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Koh FH, Ladlad J, SKHE Centre, Teo EK, Lin CL, Foo FJ (2022) Real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy improves adenoma detection rates even in experienced endoscopists: a cohort study in Singapore. Surg Endosc 37:165–171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chin SE, Wan FT, Ladlad J et al (2023) One-year review of real-time artificial intelligence (AI)-aided endoscopy performance. Surg Endosc 37:6402–6407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mori Y, Neumann H, Misawa M, Kudo SE, Bretthauer M (2021) Artificial intelligence in colonoscopy—now on the market. What’s next? J Gastroenterol Hepatol 36(1):7–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lui TKL, Leung WK (2020) Is artificial intelligence the final answer to missed polyps in colonoscopy? World J Gastroenterol 26(35):5248–5255

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Attardo S, Chandrasekar VT, Spadaccini M et al (2020) Artificial intelligence technologies for the detection of colorectal lesions: the future is now. World J Gastroenterol 26(37):5606–5616

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishiyama M, Kudo SE, Misawa M et al (2022) Impact of the clinical use of artificial intelligence-assisted neoplasia detection for colonoscopy: a large-scale prospective, propensity score-matched study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 95(1):155–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang D, Shen J, Hong J et al (2022) Effect of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 37(3):495–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hassan C, Wallace MB, Sharma P et al (2020) New artificial intelligence system: first validation study versus experienced endoscopists for colorectal polyp detection. Gut 69(5):799–800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Repici A, Badalamenti M, Maselli R et al (2020) Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 159(2):512-520.e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wallace MB, Sharma P, Bhandari P et al (2022) Impact of artificial intelligence on miss rate of colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 163(1):295-304.e295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta N, Harish V, Bilimoria K, Morgado F, Ginsburg S, Law M, Das S (2021) Knowledge of and attitudes on artificial intelligence in healthcare: a provincial survey study of medical students. MedEdPublish. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.14.21249830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li JW, Ang TL (2021) Colonoscopy and artificial intelligence: bridging the gap or a gap needing to be bridged? Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2(2):36–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wadhwa V, Alagappan M, Gonzalez A et al (2020) Physician sentiment toward artificial intelligence (AI) in colonoscopic practice: a survey of US gastroenterologists. Endosc Int Open 8(10):E1379–E1384

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Iyanna S, Kaur P, Ractham P, Talwar S, Islam AKMN (2022) Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users? J Bus Res 153:150–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunter SC, Kim B, Mudge A et al (2020) Experiences of using the i-PARIHS framework: a co-designed case study of four multi-site implementation projects. BMC Health Serv Res 20(1):573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Sengkang General Hospital Endoscopy Centre staff and endoscopists who participated in the project: Fung-Joon Foo, Winson J. Tan, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Leonard M. L. Ho, Jia-Lin Ng, Frederick H. Koh, Cheryl Chong, Darius Aw, Kam Juinn Haur, Alvin Y. H. Tan, Choon-Chieh Tan, Baldwin P. M. Yeung, Wai-Keong Wong, Bin-Chet Toh, Jasmine Ladlad, Jason Barco, Koy-Min Chue, Faith Leong, Christopher Kong, Cui-Li Lin, Eng-Kiong Teo, Yi-Kang Ng, Tze-Tong Tey, Marianne A. De-Roza, Jonathan Lum, Xiaoke Li, Jinliang Li, Nazeemah B Mohd-Nor, and Siok-Peng Ng.

Funding

No funding was provided for this study. However, the GI Genius™ Intelligent Endoscopy Module (US-DG-2000309 © 2021 Medtronic) was provided free to the institution during the study period as a form of loan for trial.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All authors participated in the conception of the idea, data collection, writing and manuscript revision. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frederick H. Koh.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Frederick H. Koh is a Key-Opinion-Leader for Medtronic for AI in Endoscopy, Asia Pacific Region. Sarah Tham, Eng-Kiong Teo, Cui Li-Lin, Fung-Joon Foo and co-authors within SKH Endoscopy Centre have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

No ethical approval was requested for the writing of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

We write this paper as a supplementary qualitative analysis as part of our single institution’s prospective cohort study with Medtronic’s GI Genius—of which two articles on the topic have been published in Surgical Endoscopy, the first by Koh et al. [1] in the July 2022 edition, and the second by Chin et al. [2] in the February 2023 edition.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tham, S., Koh, F.H., SKH Endoscopy Centre. et al. Knowledge, perceptions and behaviours of endoscopists towards the use of artificial intelligence-aided colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 37, 7395–7400 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10412-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10412-3

Keywords

Navigation