Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Perforations and anastomotic leaks of the gastrointestinal tract are severe complications, which carry high morbidity and mortality and management of these is a multi-disciplinary challenge. The use of endoluminal vacuum (EVAC) therapy has recently proven to be a useful technique to manage these complications. We report our institution’s experience with this novel technique in the chest, abdomen, and pelvis.

Methods

This is a retrospective review of an IRB approved registry of all EVAC therapy patients from July 2013 to December 2016. A total of 55 patients were examined and 49 patients were eligible for inclusion: 15 esophageal, 21 gastric, 3 small bowel, and 10 colorectal defects. The primary endpoint was closure rate of the GI tract defect with EVAC therapy.

Results

Fifteen (100%) esophageal defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 27 days consisting of an average of 6 endosponge changes every 4.8 days. Eighteen (86%) gastric defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 38 days with a mean of 9 endosponge changes every 5.3 days. Three (100%) small bowel defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 13.7 days with a mean of 2.7 endosponge changes every 4.4 days. Six (60%) colorectal defects closed with EVAC therapy. Mean duration of therapy was 23.2 days, consisting of a mean of 6 endosponge changes every 4.0 days. There were two deaths, which were not directly related to EVAC therapy and occurred outside the measured 30-day mortality.

Conclusion

Our experience demonstrates that EVAC therapy is feasible and effective for the management of gastrointestinal perforations/leaks throughout the GI tract and can be considered as a safe alternative to surgical intervention in select cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brinster CJ, Singhal S, Lee L, Marshall MB, Kaiser LR, Kucharczuk JC (2004) Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 77:1475–1483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borejsza-Wysocki M, Szmyt K, Bobkiewicz A, Malinger S, Swirkowicz J, Hermann J, Drews M, Banasiewicz T (2015) Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC): case report and review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne 10:299–310

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lang H, Piso P, Stukenborg C, Raab R, Jahne J (2000) Management and results of proximal anastomotic leaks in a series of 1114 total gastrectomies for gastric carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:168–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caulfield H, Hyman NH (2013) Anastomotic leak after low anterior resection: a spectrum of clinical entities. JAMA Surg 148:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakran N, Goitein D, Raziel A, Keidar A, Beglaibter N, Grinbaum R, Matter I, Alfici R, Mahajna A, Waksman I, Shimonov M, Assalia A (2013) Gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy: a multicenter experience with 2834 patients. Surg Endosc 27:240–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Markar SR, Arya S, Karthikesalingam A, Hanna GB (2013) Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20:4274–4281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC (2013) Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg 96:1919–1926

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arezzo A, Miegge A, Garbarini A, Morino M (2010) Endoluminal vacuum therapy for anastomotic leaks after rectal surgery. Techn Coloproctol 14:279–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mees ST, Palmes D, Mennigen R, Senninger N, Haier J, Bruewer M (2008) Endo-vacuum assisted closure treatment for rectal anastomotic insufficiency. Dis Colon Rectum 51:404–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mennigen R (2014) Novel treatment options for perforations of the upper gastrointestinal tract: endoscopic vacuum therapy and over-the-scope clips. World J Gastroenterol 20:7767

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Goenka MK, Goenka U (2015) Endotherapy of leaks and fistula. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:702–713

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Manta R, Magno L, Conigliaro R, Caruso A, Bertani H, Manno M, Zullo A, Frazzoni M, Bassotti G, Galloro G (2013) Endoscopic repair of post-surgical gastrointestinal complications. Dig Liver Dis 45:879–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brangewitz M, Voigtlander T, Helfritz FA, Lankisch TO, Winkler M, Klempnauer J, Manns MP, Schneider AS, Wedemeyer J (2013) Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis. Endoscopy 45:433–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahrens M (2010) Drainage of esophageal leakage using endoscopic vacuum therapy: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 42:693–698

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schniewind B, Schafmayer C, Voehrs G, Egberts J, von Schoenfels W, Rose T, Kurdow R, Arlt A, Ellrichmann M, Jurgensen C, Schreiber S, Becker T, Hampe J (2013) Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study. Surg Endosc 27:3883–3890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smallwood NR, Fleshman JW, Leeds SG, Burdick JS (2015) The use of endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy in the management of upper gastrointestinal leaks and perforations. Surg Endosc 30(6):2473–2480

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bludau M, Holscher AH, Herbold T, Leers JM, Gutschow C, Fuchs H, Schroder W (2014) Management of upper intestinal leaks using an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system (E-VAC). Surg Endosc 28:896–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leeds SG, Burdick JS (2016) Management of gastric leaks after sleeve gastrectomy with endoluminal vacuum (E-Vac) therapy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):1278–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee S, Ahn JY, Jung HY, Lee JH, Choi KS, Kim do H, Choi KD, Song HJ, Lee GH, Kim JH, Kim BS, Yook JH, Oh ST, Kim BS, Han S (2013) Clinical outcomes of endoscopic and surgical management for postoperative upper gastrointestinal leakage. Surg Endosc 27:4232–4240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Persson S, Elbe P, Rouvelas I, Lindblad M, Kumagai K, Lundell L, Nilsson M, Tsai JA (2014) Predictors for failure of stent treatment for benign esophageal perforations—a single center 10-year experience. World J Gastroenterol 20:10613–10619

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. de Lima KV, Costa MJ, Goncalves Mda C, Sousa BS (2013) Micronutrient deficiencies in the pre-bariatric surgery. Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva 26(Suppl 1):63–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbour JR, Iorio ML, Oh C, Tung TH, O’Neill PJ (2015) Predictive value of nutritional markers for wound healing complications in bariatric patients undergoing panniculectomy. Ann Plast Surg 75:435–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schorsch T, Muller C, Loske G (2014) Endoscopic vacuum therapy of perforations and anastomotic insufficiency of the esophagus. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 85:1081–1093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Riss S, Stift A, Meier M, Haiden E, Grunberger T, Bergmann M (2010) Endo-sponge assisted treatment of anastomotic leakage following colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12:e104–e108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M, Schuster T, Rosenberg R, Kleeff J, Friess H (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chopra SS, Mrak K, Hunerbein M (2009) The effect of endoscopic treatment on healing of anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of rectal cancer. Surgery 145:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven G. Leeds.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Marissa A. Mencio: No disclosures to report. Estrellita Ontiveros: No disclosures to report. James S. Burdick: No disclosures to report. Steven G. Leeds: Consultant for Ethicon and Torax. No relevant disclosures to report for this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mencio, M.A., Ontiveros, E., Burdick, J.S. et al. Use of a novel technique to manage gastrointestinal leaks with endoluminal negative pressure: a single institution experience. Surg Endosc 32, 3349–3356 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6055-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6055-x

Keywords

Navigation