Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Robotic left colon cancer resection: a dual docking technique that maximizes splenic flexure mobilization

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Techniques for robotic resection of the left colon are not well defined and have not been widely adopted due to limited range of motion of the robotic arms. We have developed a dual docking technique for both the splenic flexure and the pelvis. We report our initial experience of robotic left colectomy using this technique for left-sided colon cancer.

Methods

The study group comprised 61 patients who underwent robotic left colon cancer resection using our dual docking technique between July 2008 and January 2013. Operations comprised two stages: colon mobilization (stage 1) followed by pelvic dissection (stage 2). After completion of stage 1, the robot arms were undocked and the operating table was rotated 60° counterclockwise until a 45° angle was created between the patient cart and the operating table.

Results

All 61 procedures were technically successful without the need for conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery. Median total operation, 1st docking, and 2nd docking times were 227 min (range, 137–653 min), 4 min (range, 3–8 min), and 3 min (range, 3–9 min), respectively. Estimated blood loss was 20 ml (range, 20–2,000 ml). Median time to soft diet was 2 days (range, 2–12 days) and median length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 4–20 days). Median total number of lymph nodes harvested was 17 (range, 3–61). According to the Clavien–Dindo classification, the numbers of complications for grades 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 were 10, 2, 3, 3, and 1. There was no mortality within 30 days.

Conclusions

Robotic left colon cancer resection using our dual docking technique is safe and feasible. This procedure can maximize splenic mobilization in robotic colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2007) Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol 25(21):3061–3068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. COLOR Study Group (2000) COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Dig Surg 17(6):617–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246(4):655–662 discussion 662-654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, Yamamoto S, Kitajima M (2003) Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 17(4):636–640

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, Trevisan P, Sovernigo G, Orsini C, Guidolin D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47(12):2162–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi DJ, Kim SH, Lee PJ, Kim J, Woo SU (2009) Single-stage totally robotic dissection for rectal cancer surgery: technique and short-term outcome in 50 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 52(11):1824–1830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hellan M, Stein H, Pigazzi A (2009) Totally robotic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision and splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 23(2):447–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park YA, Kim JM, Kim SA, Min BS, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Lee KY (2010) Totally robotic surgery for rectal cancer: from splenic flexure to pelvic floor in one setup. Surg Endosc 24(3):715–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, Pozzi S, Faso FL, Ravizza D, Zampino G, Sonzogni A, Biffi R (2009) Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 16(5):1274–1278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD, Paz B, Pigazzi A (2007) Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14(11):3168–3173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Baik SH, Lee WJ, Rha KH, Kim NK, Sohn SK, Chi HS, Cho CH, Lee SK, Cheon JH, Ahn JB, Kim WH (2008) Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using four robotic arms. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 22(3):792–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park IJ, You YN, Schlette E, Nguyen S, Skibber JM, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Chang GJ (2012) Reverse-hybrid robotic mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55(2):228–233

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, Bailey C, Leroy J, Marescaux J (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143(8):762–767 discussion 768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Yamaguchi T (2010) Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24(11):2749–2754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Han KS, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Park SY, Jun SH (2010) Short-term outcomes of a laparoscopic left hemicolectomy for descending colon cancer: retrospective comparison with an open left hemicolectomy. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 26(5):347–353

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kariv Y, Delaney CP (2005) Robotics in colorectal surgery. Minerva Chir 60(5):401–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Crawford DL (2006) Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 20(11):1713–1718

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein NS, Sanford W, Coffey M, Layfield LJ (1996) Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered. Am J Clin Pathol 106(2):209–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Bae, Baek, Hur, Baik, Kim, and Min have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sung Uk Bae.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bae, S.U., Baek, S.J., Hur, H. et al. Robotic left colon cancer resection: a dual docking technique that maximizes splenic flexure mobilization. Surg Endosc 29, 1303–1309 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3805-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3805-2

Keywords

Navigation